Re: DNS not working - Rank High

Hex Star wrote: On 8/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] * <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: On 8/17/07, Hex Star <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: DNS not working - Rank High

On 8/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 8/17/07, Hex Star <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors but > google.com still show search engi

Re: Do I or RR need dns clue?

> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > > > >> > >> Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > >> > Down is there isn't power to it until it gets repaired. So its not > >> > answering period. A "nslookup" shows "timed-out". A "dig" shows > >> > "connection timed out; no servers could be reached" (

Re: Re: DNS not working - Rank High

On 8/17/07, Hex Star <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors but > >> google.com still show search engine. Please advise how to do so more > >> visitor in return? May the

Road Runner / Sprint routing / DNS issues this morning?

I've had a steady trickle of reachability complaints coming from Road Runner users over the course of the day today. I started seeing wackiness about 7:30AM Eastern this morning when a VPN tunnel into a Road Runner customer dropped off. It seems as if the problems have stabilized over the last h

Kill this thread (Re: DNS not working)

I think this thread is obviously silly, so please refrain from posting further on this and feeding the troll... Thanks! On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors but > google.com still show search engine. Please ad

AS14906: wtf? (Fwd: BGP Update Report)

OK, I have to ask... Begin forwarded message: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: August 17, 2007 5:00:04 AM PDT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog@merit.edu, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], routing- [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: BGP Update Report BGP Update

RE: question on algorithm for radius based accouting

> > They should yield (approximately) the same result. But, to be > > pedantic, > > you haven't accounted for latency within the network. > > > > Somebody should be whipped, either for: > > 2) You, for making even this aged arch-pedant wince. :-) Ding! > Seriously, can I also add that RADIUS

Paetec outage

Hi all, we are getting complaints from a bunch of our clients with Paetec circuits in the Newark, NJ area. Anyone know of any outages in the area? Tim Donahue

Re: question on algorithm for radius based accouting

On 17 Aug 2007, at 04:52, Alex Rubenstein wrote: My question is: what's the best algorithm for constrcting broadband access record from radius accouting packets? [snip] They should yield (approximately) the same result. But, to be pedantic, you haven't accounted for latency with

The Cidr Report

This report has been generated at Fri Aug 17 21:15:09 2007 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date

BGP Update Report

BGP Update Report Interval: 16-Jul-07 -to- 16-Aug-07 (32 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS14906 173904 2.7% 34780.8 -- 2 - AS9583 150061 2.4% 128.5 -- SIFY-AS-IN Si

Re: Extreme congestion (was Re: inter-domain link recovery)

On Aug 17, 2007, at 6:57 AM, Stephen Wilcox wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:07:31AM -0700, Hex Star wrote: How does akamai handle traffic congestion so seamlessly? Perhaps we should look at existing setups implemented by companies such as akamai for guidelines regarding how to re

Re: Extreme congestion (was Re: inter-domain link recovery)

On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 09:07:31AM -0700, Hex Star wrote: >How does akamai handle traffic congestion so seamlessly? Perhaps we should >look at existing setups implemented by companies such as akamai for >guidelines regarding how to resolve this kind of issue... and if you are a Conten

Re: Extreme congestion (was Re: inter-domain link recovery)

On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:54:47AM +0100, Sam Stickland wrote: > > Ted Hardie wrote: > >Fred Baker writes: > > > > > >>Hence, moving a file into a campus doesn't mean that the campus has the > >>file and will stop bothering you. I'm pushing an agenda in the open > >>source world to add some

Re: Extreme congestion (was Re: inter-domain link recovery)

Sam Stickland wrote: > > Ted Hardie wrote: >> Fred Baker writes: >> >> >>> Hence, moving a file into a campus doesn't mean that the campus has >>> the file and will stop bothering you. I'm pushing an agenda in the >>> open source world to add some concept of locality, with the purpose >>> of m

Re: Extreme congestion (was Re: inter-domain link recovery)

Ted Hardie wrote: Fred Baker writes: Hence, moving a file into a campus doesn't mean that the campus has the file and will stop bothering you. I'm pushing an agenda in the open source world to add some concept of locality, with the purpose of moving traffic off ISP networks when I can.

Re: Extreme congestion (was Re: inter-domain link recovery)

On 8/17/07, Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I'm pushing an agenda in the open source world to add > > > some concept of locality, with the purpose of moving traffic off ISP > > > networks when I can. I think the user will be just

Anyone seeing ongoing issues with AOL?

Anyone else seeing ongoing issues with AOL? I started having users badger me about not being able to reach our video site about 3 days ago. With traces out, I am seeing in the range of 50% packet losses when I get into AOL. I tried this from both my Cogent, and another location where we have