BGP Update Report
Interval: 08-Oct-07 -to- 08-Nov-07 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS9583 233754 2.8% 198.4 -- SIFY-AS-IN Sify Limited
2 - AS16637 180622 2.1%
This report has been generated at Fri Nov 9 21:13:59 2007 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
Dear Colleagues:
As you know, we are all seeing a single mailer message show up in our
mailboxes at ~0330/est on a daily basis. We are aware that this is
on-going.
The issue is being actively worked on by the admin team at Merit and a
resolution is forthcoming. Since the message happens once a d
We have been having difficulty sending email to hotmail.com email
addresses. This started several weeks ago and was tracked to a computer
computer that was indeed sending out spam - but has since been resolved.
Normal measures to contact MSN/Hotmail have gone nowhere. We've received
the ru
On Nov 9, 2007 11:00 AM, Bill Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Given the serious impact this is having on operations, does this have a
> master ticket number or escalation id of some type? Has the vendor been
> involved yet? When can we expect to see a post mortem/RFO?
>
> - billn
Try not to
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:11:28AM -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> > On Nov 9, 2007 11:00 AM, Bill Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Given the serious impact this is having on operations, does this have a
> > > master ticket number or escalation i
Given the serious impact this is having on operations, does this have a
master ticket number or escalation id of some type? Has the vendor been
involved yet? When can we expect to see a post mortem/RFO?
- billn
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues:
>
> As you know
Bill Nash wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:11:28AM -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 9, 2007 11:00 AM, Bill Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Given the serious impact this is having on operations, does this have a
> So where's the ticket then?
It's perfectly reasonable to expect some sort of detail since our
attendance fees help fund the operation of the list. There's an issue
with the complexity of the delivery system that has developed over
time and some new anti-spam appliances that have been implemente
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Carl Karsten wrote:
> I do the networking in my house, and hang out with guys that do networking
> in small offices that have a few T1s. Now I am talking to people about a
> DS3 connection for 500 laptops*, and I am bing told "a p4 linux box with 2
> nics doing NAT
On Nov 10, 2007 2:43 AM, Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm able to get 45Mb/s through a P3-800 with a four-port NIC running NAT and
> simple content filtering with SmoothWall Advanced Firewall 2 easily. Have a
> box doing that right now.
Speaking of all that, does someone have a "confe
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Speaking of all that, does someone have a "conference wireless' bcp
> handy? The sort that starts off with "dont deploy $50 unbranded
> taiwanese / linksys etc routers that fall over and die at more than 5
> associations, place them so you d
The important thing to remember is that when you exceed 20 to 30
wireless users in a small area, your now dealing with an 'Enterprise'
deployment. Lots of whitepapers exist on this subject. Design your
layer 2 stuff correctly, and use L3 gear that is up to the task. If
you're trying to use Link
13 matches
Mail list logo
