On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Andrew Staples wrote:
Speaking of running gig long distances, does anyone on the list have
suggestions on a >8 port L2 switch with fiber ports based on personal
experience? Lots of 48 port gig switches have 2-4 fiber uplink ports, but
this means daisy-chains instead of hub/s
> Speaking of running gig long distances, does anyone on the list have
> suggestions on a >8 port L2 switch with fiber ports based on personal
> experience? Lots of 48 port gig switches have 2-4 fiber uplink ports, but
> this means daisy-chains instead of hub/spoke. Looking for a central switch
I have one of these.
http://www.netgear.com/Products/Switches/Layer3ManagedSwitches/GSM7328FS.aspx
Relatively inexpensive, and works happily with Cisco or OEM GBICs. I've
always had good success working with their engineering folks for feature
requests and troubleshooting. My main gripe is the
Speaking of running gig long distances, does anyone on the list have
suggestions on a >8 port L2 switch with fiber ports based on personal
experience? Lots of 48 port gig switches have 2-4 fiber uplink ports, but
this means daisy-chains instead of hub/spoke. Looking for a central switch
for a st
On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:48:47 MDT, Michael Loftis said:
> Yeah except in a lot of areas there is no MAN, and the ILECs want to bend
> you over for any data access. I've no idea how well the MAN idea is coming
> along in various areas, but you still have to pay for access to it somehow,
> and th
--On March 29, 2008 5:04:01 PM -0500 Frank Coluccio
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Dillon is spot on when he states the following (quotation below),
although he could have gone another step in suggesting how the distance
insensitivity of fiber could be further leveraged:
The high spe
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:24 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here is a little hint - most distributed applications in
> > traditional jobsets, tend to work best when they are close
> > together. Unless you can map those jobsets onto truly
> > partitioned algorithms that work on local copy, th
Alex's point is that 5x density does not mean that the infrastructure costs
are less than 5x. At a certain point in time there is a rate of return
lower than 1.
We're so stuck thinking that costs are primarily related to square feet, but
with powering and cooling costs being the primary factors,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you're with Experian contact please ping me off-list it would be
really great.
regards,
/virendra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFH8pSppbZvC
One other option we theorize would be to have dedicated
VPNv4 route reflectors (route reflectors that do not
reflect other address families, e.g., IPv4, IPv6, e.t.c.).
We have dedicated VPNv4 route reflectors, they work well for us.
Dave.
10 matches
Mail list logo