This affected us too, same impact. No official word from Level3, but it
looks to be back up now.
My normal path was SJO-LAX-DAL-MIA, now it's SJO-LAX-DEN-DAL-MIA. I can
only speculate that it was related to the LAX-DAL link. It lasted about an
hour.
Chris
> -Original Message-
> Fr
Hi,
Anyone else get hit with a partial outage in South Florida? Most prefixes
stayed up, some didn't. Started just before 2pm, ok as of about 15 minutes
ago, EST.
Thanks,
Chris Ranch
Hostway Corp
Hi,
Anyone else get hit with a partial outage in South Florida? Most prefixes
stayed up, some didn't. Started just before 2pm, ok as of about 15 minutes
ago, EST.
Thanks,
Chris Ranch
Hostway Corp
Umm, which backbone, AT&T (legacy), SBCIS or PBNI?
I'm so confused.
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of matthew zeier
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 5:13 PM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: AT&T transit - thoughts?
>
>
>
On Wednesday, January 18, 2006 12:10 PM, Pat wrote:
> On Jan 18, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>
> >>> Is it a reasonable alternative to establish a BGP connection with
> >>> the provider over ethernet?
> >>
> >> It is technical feasible, but I don't think 'reasonable'.
> Stub ASes
> >>
Hello Folks,
Is it just us, or are others experiencing loss/latency/bgp flapping
within Cogent (AS174) network in Miami? I'm not a direct customer; my
upstream is working with them, and was wondering. This appears to have
started for us 10/29/05 19:40 EDT.
Thanks,
Chris Ranch
In case no one else has suggested it: the source MAC address will
identify the source.
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Scott Morris
> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 9:21 AM
> To: 'Tom Sanders'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE
Hi Randy,
> > I might be wrong, but I thought an image with IPv6 support required
> > 16 MB flash on the 2500?
>
> could be. don't care. don't need ipv6 on terminal servers
> for oob access.
But the vulnerability applies for only ipv6-enabled devices...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707
Perhaps you could improve your site's survivability by colocating or
otherwise hosting it. That is, take the T1's out of the picture... The
economics of DDoS mitigation may change in your favor too.
Changing our policy to not support irc is one of the best things we did.
I've always felt DDoS
On May 31, 2005 12:39 PM, Jason Frisvold wrote:
> On 5/31/05, Chris Ranch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Looks like they want us to turn over customer info without the
> > subpoena, but simply with a phone call (or whatever) from an
> > investigator. I would
m the investigator's identity, whereas currently the sub carries
sufficient authority.
I don't think you meant to say 'without any specific criminal charges
having been filed', as subpoena'd evidence leads to charges.
Chris Ranch
Affinity Internet, Inc.
> -Original Mess
> > I don't know why they even sell the NSE100. You want the
> NPE with the
> > PXF.
> >
> > Chris
>
> No, that's backward.
>
> The NSE100 has the PXF processor.
>
> The NPE-G100 is a software router.
Correct, of course. Thanks.
Chris
Correcting a typo...
> Yes, the 7206vxr with whatever processor really checks out
> when under any kind of real flood through it. It's big
> brother, the 7304-NSE100 does as well. But the 7304-NPE100
> with the PXF can forward that (d)DoS very well. Even with
> fairly extensive ingress fi
ness decision not to host one of the typical DDoS magnets
> (dont allow people to run IRC bots on your colo farm, for example)
Dumping our IRC customers dropped our DDoS frequency by an order of
magnitude. We've certainly slept better as a result.
Chris
Chris Ranch
Director of Network Architecture
Affinity Internet, Inc.
s filters, core null routing, and your favorite ddos
mitigation equipment filtering has been very effective for us.
Chris
Chris Ranch
Director of Network Architecture
Affinity Internet, Inc.
Eric Whitehill wrote:
> Anyone know what, if anything happened with Level3 this
> morning? (8-10am, CDT)
Level3 in LAX is/was fine...
Chris
> Drew Weaver wrote:
> | Howdy. We?re looking at upgrading our border router(s)
> | from 7500s to (something) yet undetermined.
I love my 7304-G100's as a nice step up from the 7500's, and short of
the GSR or J-vendor. Be sure to get the G100's and not the NSE-100 (no
PXF). Order
Title: RE: Level 3 US east coast "issues"
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 9:32 AM PDT
>
> Level3 states that they have isolated the problem down to equipment in
> their Washington DC Point of Presence. They believe that they have
> resolved the problem and things should be normalizing in
>
Title: RE: The use of .0/.255 addresses.
I see traffic from this last IP address octet all the time from prefixes of length less than /24. Use of these host id's when the prefix length is greater than or equal to /24 is illegal. So if that's your case, I'd suggest not doing it.
If that's no
Title: RE: Can a customer take IP's with them?
Sorry about the html.
^%$%&*.!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Ranch
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 10:12 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: RE: Can a customer take IP's with them?
Hello Alex,
> > In other words, customer is asking a court to rule whether
> > or not IP space should be portable, when an industry-
> > supported organization (ARIN) has made policy that the
> > space is in fact not portable. It can be furthe
Title: RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 o r other vendor ?
Crap, sorry about the html.
Title: RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ?
Steve Gibbard wrote:
> Being able to take a full BGP table in a Cisco is simply a matter of
> having enough memory.
I just accidentally ran into an ugly surprise turning up some 4006/SupIV's with full
ECTED]'Subject: Genu/L3 Major Outage
Hello,
Anyone know what's going on with GENU/L3's
failure? I have an OC-3 in South Florida up/up, but bgp peer not
responding. 17:00 EST.
Thanks,
Chris
------ Chris Ranch Director of
Title: RE: possible L3 issues
Definite failures in South East US. I have a dead OC-3.
Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 2:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: possib
Title: Genu/L3 Major Outage
Hello,
Anyone know what's going on with GENU/L3's failure? I have an OC-3 in South Florida up/up, but bgp peer not responding. 17:00 EST.
Thanks,
Chris
------
Chris Ranch
Director of Network Architectur
26 matches
Mail list logo