RE: Load balancing outgoing connections automatically.

2004-12-03 Thread Chris Ranch
> Drew Weaver wrote: > | Howdy. We?re looking at upgrading our border router(s) > | from 7500s to (something) yet undetermined. I love my 7304-G100's as a nice step up from the 7500's, and short of the GSR or J-vendor. Be sure to get the G100's and not the NSE-100 (no PXF). Order

RE: Level3 Blip?

2005-04-29 Thread Chris Ranch
Eric Whitehill wrote: > Anyone know what, if anything happened with Level3 this > morning? (8-10am, CDT) Level3 in LAX is/was fine... Chris

RE: DOS attack tracing

2005-05-10 Thread Chris Ranch
s filters, core null routing, and your favorite ddos mitigation equipment filtering has been very effective for us. Chris Chris Ranch Director of Network Architecture Affinity Internet, Inc.

RE: DOS attack tracing

2005-05-10 Thread Chris Ranch
ness decision not to host one of the typical DDoS magnets > (dont allow people to run IRC bots on your colo farm, for example) Dumping our IRC customers dropped our DDoS frequency by an order of magnitude. We've certainly slept better as a result. Chris Chris Ranch Director of Network Architecture Affinity Internet, Inc.

RE: DOS attack tracing

2005-05-10 Thread Chris Ranch
Correcting a typo... > Yes, the 7206vxr with whatever processor really checks out > when under any kind of real flood through it. It's big > brother, the 7304-NSE100 does as well. But the 7304-NPE100 > with the PXF can forward that (d)DoS very well. Even with > fairly extensive ingress fi

RE: DOS attack tracing

2005-05-10 Thread Chris Ranch
> > I don't know why they even sell the NSE100. You want the > NPE with the > > PXF. > > > > Chris > > No, that's backward. > > The NSE100 has the PXF processor. > > The NPE-G100 is a software router. Correct, of course. Thanks. Chris

RE: Administration Asks Appeals Court To Compel ISP Searches

2005-05-31 Thread Chris Ranch
m the investigator's identity, whereas currently the sub carries sufficient authority. I don't think you meant to say 'without any specific criminal charges having been filed', as subpoena'd evidence leads to charges. Chris Ranch Affinity Internet, Inc. > -Original Mess

RE: Administration Asks Appeals Court To Compel ISP Searches

2005-05-31 Thread Chris Ranch
On May 31, 2005 12:39 PM, Jason Frisvold wrote: > On 5/31/05, Chris Ranch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looks like they want us to turn over customer info without the > > subpoena, but simply with a phone call (or whatever) from an > > investigator. I would

RE: Provider-based DDoS Protection Services

2005-07-29 Thread Chris Ranch
Perhaps you could improve your site's survivability by colocating or otherwise hosting it. That is, take the T1's out of the picture... The economics of DDoS mitigation may change in your favor too. Changing our policy to not support irc is one of the best things we did. I've always felt DDoS

RE: "Cisco gate" and "Meet the Fed" at Defcon....

2005-08-02 Thread Chris Ranch
Hi Randy, > > I might be wrong, but I thought an image with IPv6 support required > > 16 MB flash on the 2500? > > could be. don't care. don't need ipv6 on terminal servers > for oob access. But the vulnerability applies for only ipv6-enabled devices... http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707

RE: Rip again!

2005-08-21 Thread Chris Ranch
In case no one else has suggested it: the source MAC address will identify the source. Chris > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Scott Morris > Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 9:21 AM > To: 'Tom Sanders'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE

Cogent problems in Miami?

2005-10-31 Thread Chris Ranch
Hello Folks, Is it just us, or are others experiencing loss/latency/bgp flapping within Cogent (AS174) network in Miami? I'm not a direct customer; my upstream is working with them, and was wondering. This appears to have started for us 10/29/05 19:40 EDT. Thanks, Chris Ranch

RE: PI space and colocation

2006-01-18 Thread Chris Ranch
On Wednesday, January 18, 2006 12:10 PM, Pat wrote: > On Jan 18, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Jon Lewis wrote: > > >>> Is it a reasonable alternative to establish a BGP connection with > >>> the provider over ethernet? > >> > >> It is technical feasible, but I don't think 'reasonable'. > Stub ASes > >>

RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 o r other vendor ?

2004-04-26 Thread Chris Ranch
Title: RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or other vendor ? Steve Gibbard wrote: > Being able to take a full BGP table in a Cisco is simply a matter of > having enough memory.  I just accidentally ran into an ugly surprise turning up some 4006/SupIV's with full

RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 o r other vendor ?

2004-04-26 Thread Chris Ranch
Title: RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 o r other vendor ? Crap, sorry about the html.

RE: Can a customer take IP's with them?

2004-06-23 Thread Chris Ranch
Title: RE: Can a customer take IP's with them? Hello Alex, > > In other words, customer is asking a court to rule whether > > or not IP space should be portable, when an industry- > > supported organization (ARIN) has made policy that the > > space is in fact not portable. It can be furthe

RE: Can a customer take IP's with them?

2004-06-23 Thread Chris Ranch
Title: RE: Can a customer take IP's with them? Sorry about the html. ^%$%&*.! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Ranch Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 10:12 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: The use of .0/.255 addresses.

2004-06-26 Thread Chris Ranch
Title: RE: The use of .0/.255 addresses. I see traffic from this last IP address octet all the time from prefixes of length less than /24.  Use of these host id's when the prefix length is greater than or equal to /24 is illegal.  So if that's your case, I'd suggest not doing it. If that's no

RE: Level 3 US east coast "issues"

2004-10-18 Thread Chris Ranch
Title: RE: Level 3 US east coast "issues" > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 9:32 AM PDT > > Level3 states that they have isolated the problem down to equipment in > their Washington DC Point of Presence.  They believe that they have > resolved the problem and things should be normalizing in >

Genu/L3 Major Outage

2004-02-23 Thread Chris Ranch
Title: Genu/L3 Major Outage Hello, Anyone know what's going on with GENU/L3's failure?  I have an OC-3 in South Florida up/up, but bgp peer not responding.  17:00 EST. Thanks, Chris ------ Chris Ranch Director of Network Architectur

RE: possible L3 issues

2004-02-23 Thread Chris Ranch
Title: RE: possible L3 issues Definite failures in South East US.  I have a dead OC-3. Chris > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 2:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: possib

RE: Genu/L3 Major Outage

2004-02-23 Thread Chris Ranch
ECTED]'Subject: Genu/L3 Major Outage Hello, Anyone know what's going on with GENU/L3's failure?  I have an OC-3 in South Florida up/up, but bgp peer not responding.  17:00 EST. Thanks, Chris ------ Chris Ranch Director of

RE: AT&T transit - thoughts?

2006-03-15 Thread Chris Ranch
Umm, which backbone, AT&T (legacy), SBCIS or PBNI? I'm so confused. Chris > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of matthew zeier > Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 5:13 PM > To: nanog@merit.edu > Subject: AT&T transit - thoughts? > > >

Leve3/other outages in South Florida?

2008-02-07 Thread Chris Ranch
Hi, Anyone else get hit with a partial outage in South Florida? Most prefixes stayed up, some didn't. Started just before 2pm, ok as of about 15 minutes ago, EST. Thanks, Chris Ranch Hostway Corp

Leve3/other outages in South Florida?

2008-02-07 Thread Chris Ranch
Hi, Anyone else get hit with a partial outage in South Florida? Most prefixes stayed up, some didn't. Started just before 2pm, ok as of about 15 minutes ago, EST. Thanks, Chris Ranch Hostway Corp

RE: Level 3, again

2008-02-12 Thread Chris Ranch
This affected us too, same impact. No official word from Level3, but it looks to be back up now. My normal path was SJO-LAX-DAL-MIA, now it's SJO-LAX-DEN-DAL-MIA. I can only speculate that it was related to the LAX-DAL link. It lasted about an hour. Chris > -Original Message- > Fr