that checkbox.
If the abuse desk has already acted upon it, why not have the automated
system let me know?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 5:08 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE
Piecing together the information I've learned over time, is it possible that
VeriSign handles some of that for Verizon?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Deepak Jain
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 6:37 PM
To: David Coulson
Cc: David
,
and for service providers and operators large enough to staff their network
24x7 for other reasons, 4 hour response time all the time.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 4:11 PM
To: Rob Szarka
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Sounds like the obvious thing to tell customers complaining about their
e-mail not getting to Yahoo! is to tell them that Yahoo! doesn't want it.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Edward B. DREGER
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 2:44 PM
I tried this on three laptops (two different models), and none of them would
fully boot. They would lock up at different points.
Unless someone has some workarounds, I think I'll be trying another ISO
package.
Regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Tim Peiffer [mailto:[EMAIL
Good idea, but the other side doesn't have a Cisco box.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 11:02 AM
To: Michael Holstein
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Bandwidth issues in the Sprint network
Does anyone know of bootable Linux CD with iperf on it?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Gonnason
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:05 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Bandwidth issues in the Sprint network
On Tue, Apr 8
in the right direction.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott Weeks
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 1:16 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Speedtest site accuracy [was: Bandwidth issues in the Sprint
network]
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try
://perspectives.mvdirona.com/2008/04/06/DiseconomiesOfScale.aspx
Frank
---
, we may be better
off thinking in terms of costs in relation to amps.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Boyle
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 10:29 PM
To: Alex Pilosov; Paul Vixie
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: cooling door
received onlist responses, so I responded here in kind, but my earlier
offer still holds.
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
212-587-8150 Office
347-526-6788 Mobile
--
On Mon Mar 31 9:53 , vijay gill sent:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Frank Coluccio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a continuation _offlist _
with anyone so inclined. If anything worthwhile results I'd be pleased to post
it
here at a later date. TIA.
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
212-587-8150 Office
347-526-6788 Mobile
On Sun Mar 30 3:17 , Mikael Abrahamsson sent:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, Frank Coluccio
Silly me. I didn't mean turns alone, but also intended to include the number
of
state transitions (e-o, o-e, e-e, etc.) in my preceding reply, as well.
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
212-587-8150 Office
347-526-6788 Mobile
On Sun Mar 30 16:47 , Frank Coluccio sent:
Mikael, I see your
shifting conditions, and in a league with the constraints that are imposed by
the
now-seemingly-obligatory 100-meter UTP design.
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
212-587-8150 Office
347-526-6788 Mobile
On Sat Mar 29 13:57 , sent:
Can someone please, pretty please with sugar on top, explain
with
tenants occupying large contiguous areas, I think it makes a great deal of
sense,
or at least would be worth evaluating to determine if it does.
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
212-587-8150 Office
347-526-6788 Mobile
On Sat Mar 29 18:30 , david raistrick sent:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008
environment may actually
cost far less.
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
212-587-8150 Office
347-526-6788 Mobile
On Sat Mar 29 19:20 , Mikael Abrahamsson sent:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, Frank Coluccio wrote:
We often discuss the empowerment afforded by optical technology, but we've
barely
scratched
. Thanks.
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
212-587-8150 Office
347-526-6788 Mobile
On Sat Mar 29 20:30 , Mikael Abrahamsson sent:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008, Frank Coluccio wrote:
Please clarify. To which network element are you referring in connection with
extended lookup times? Is it the collapsed
case,
it's reactive.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Lyon
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 5:02 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Mitigating HTTP DDoS attacks?
Howdy all,
So, i'm kind of new to this so please deal with my ignorance
per square foot. Does it really matter if you can only offer 5kW/rack if
you can price it at 80% of the guy who can sells a 10kW/rack product? Or is
this a tough point for the sales person to make?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben
that!)
and charging a nominal fee for U's.
Please feel free to set me straight as I'm rambling on about something I
don't know about. =)
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Deepak Jain
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 10:27 PM
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject
Felix:
There's still a routing look at above.net, as documented by others and the
other listserv you posted this on (cisco-nsp?).
1276 ms73 ms79 ms chp-brdr-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.139.150]
1378 ms77 ms75 ms so-4-1-0.mpr2.ord7.us.above.net
[64.125.12.149]
14
to require a
DOCSIS 3.0 blade and/or CM.
Regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 8:48 AM
To: Mark Newton
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: IPv6 on SOHO routers?
Mark Newton wrote
is that
we'll see dual-stack for at least a decade or two to come.
Frank
than not. And as our history has shown, there's been close to zero
issues. Yes, perhaps customers just didn't bother to call in to complain or
that call wasn't escalated to me, but I think I could communicate a pretty
convincing argument if required.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
, that as
far as name brands recognized in the U.S., only Apple makes a SOHO router
that support IPv6.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:56 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: IPv6 on SOHO
Looks like there's some kind of wiki here, too:
http://www.getipv6.info/index.php/Broadband_CPE
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Frank Bulk - iNAME
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3:06 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: IPv6 on SOHO
And it looks like the Buffalo WZR-AG300NH claims support, too:
http://www.buffalotech.com/files/products/wzr-ag300nh_DS.pdf
I don't consider Buffalo a tier 1 or 2 SOHO vendor, but they're still on my
top-ten list for SOHO networking vendors.
Regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From
Those ACLs were added when I came on board. Again, only one complaint in 3+
years.
And customers wonder why I shudder when they tell me that they plug in their
Win9x computers directly into their cable modem. I can't imagine how much
worse it would be if I didn't block the SMB ports.
Frank
the
OEM version of the software didn't implement communications the same way as
their branded version.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean
Donelan
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 2:30 PM
To: Scott Weeks
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re
Those using Google for SMTP can still use their ISP's SMTP servers for
outbound
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ang
Kah Yik
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 7:40 PM
To: Andy Dills
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Customer-facing
Sorry if I wasn't more clear, but I'm not asking about inbound attempts, I'm
asking about the number of outbound attempts a host would perform.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Joel Jaeggli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 11:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Mark
for all the undesired apps.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Justin Shore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 12:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Mark Foster'; Dave Pooser; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Customer-facing ACLs
It varies widely. I see some extremely slow
a day to keep the helpdesk people sane, and then apply
a global block at the edge once done to catch any subnets that one might
have missed.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kameron Gasso
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 2:44 PM
To: Justin M
The last few spam incidents I measured an outflow of about 2 messages per
second. Does anyone know how aggressive Telnet and SSH scanning is? Even
if it was greater, it's my guess there are many more hosts spewing spam than
there are running abusive telnet and SSH scans.
Frank
-Original
For power conservation the units might automatically shut down data
services.
Frank
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Diaz
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 11:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Power outages in Florida
Being
schemes, so that they can even further
over-subscribe their network.
Frank
Hi guys,
Can you help me correct my our router? please see the details below.
BTW, our ISP told me that there's no problem with their side but still i
can't find any of my configuration that causing this.
Looking forward for your help thanks your.
./fRank
#traceroute nanog.org
Type escape
all the AS numbers are the same
On Feb 19, 2008 10:39 PM, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Can you help me correct my our router? please see the details below.
BTW, our ISP told me that there's no problem with their side but still i
can't find any of my configuration that causing
Thank you guys for your help.
was so new, they started spewing spam again. In
this case, their AV software gave them a false sense of assurance.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Radabaugh
Sent: 2008-02-13 17:35
To: nanog list
Subject: Re: IBM report reviews
that, indeed, there were no vessels in the waters surrounding the
breaks, as is also noted in the reference MIT TR article above.
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
347-526-6788
This will be my only post on this subject after biting my tongue for several
days:)
Some members will appreciate this item I came across earlier, I'm sure. As
always, caveat emptor.
Where is the USS Jimmy Carter?
By Dave | February 3, 2008
http://tinyurl.com/3y7zgu
List members -- and
-servers.net and j.root-servers.net (2001:503:BA3e::2:30 and
2001:503:C27::2:30) please feel free to contact us. We may be able to
assist in getting filters updated or working around any connectivity
issues.
Thank you,
Frank Scalzo
VeriSign
Ah, that old-age problem of designing redundancy to cover one failure, but
not two.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Justin Shore
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:41 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Level3 in the Midwest
We've figured our customer base ranges between 8 to 12 kbps/customer.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alastair Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 4:09 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Lessons from the AU model
Mark Newton
I'm not struggling -- anyone else volunteer that they are? It costs to
upgrade plant/equipment to meet traffic growth, but it's being done and no
one is saying that their prices are going up. Even from the customer
perspective, the bang for their buck has continued to rise.
Frank
Is this story relevant?
Undersea cable to slash Aust broadband costs
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/2/story.cfm?c_id=2objectid=10486793
They seem have the sales angle all locked up.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthew Moyle
upstream so
that everyone has decent performance that do the expensive field world to
split the shared medium (via deeper fiber, more radios, overlaying
frequencies, etc).
Long-term, fiber avoids the upstream performance issues.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
and switched. The challenge with the Active Ethernet
architecture is that most often active electronics need to be placed in the
field, while many PON solutions can use passive optical splitters.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Sean Donelan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January
-5 years. On the DSL side, the work on VDSL2 demonstrates the
greatest benefits on short loops. I haven't see any technology that serves
fantastic upstream speeds at 1, 2 and 3x a CSA.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL
base (say, 80%), and slowly raise the unlimited pricing for the 15 to 20%
that want that service, such that at the end of the day, the costs are less
AND the revenue is greater.
Frank
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod
Beck
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 2:25
Funny, I saw nothing on Qwest's stat site, either:
http://stat.qwest.net/statqwest/perfRptIndex.jsp
http://stat.qwest.net/index_flash.html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Shultz
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 12:16 AM
heard, but perhaps
other operators have differing opinions or experiences.
The '250' is really 250 subscribers in my case, but you're right, you see
different figures bandied about in regards to homes passed and penetration.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
I'm not aware of MSOs configuring their upstreams to attain rates for 9 and
27 Mbps for version 1 and 2, respectively. The numbers you quote are the
theoretical max, not the deployed values.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mikael
of downstream to
upstream ports.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 5:41 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: FW: ISPs slowing P2P traffic...
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Frank Bulk wrote:
I'm
to attain a 1:1
ratio.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geo.
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 1:47 PM
To: nanog list
Subject: Re: ISPs slowing P2P traffic...
The vast majority of our last-mile connections are fixed wireless
I
would call disproportionate ratios.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 11:22 AM
To: nanog list
Subject: RE: ISPs slowing P2P traffic...
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Frank Bulk wrote
We're delivering full IP connectivity, it's the school that's deciding to
rate-limit based on application type.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:28 PM
To: nanog list
Subject: RE
are
moving toward that goal. In the meantime, it is what it is and we need to
deal with it.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Joe Greco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: ISPs slowing P2P traffic...
Geo
Without being totally conspiratorial, do you think the network engineers at
these service providers know that that their residential subscribers' PCs
and links aren't tuned for high speeds, and so can feel fairly confident in
selling these speeds knowing they won't be used?
Frank
-Original
I'm not aware of any modern cable modems that operate at 10 Mbps. Not that
they couldn't set it at that speed, but AFAIK, they're all 10/100 ports.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Blake Pfankuch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 9:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
that if I don't see a drop a traffic, my end-users are
behaving themselves!
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Yukiyasu Tarui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 10:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Microsoft's Black Tuesday bandwidth impact?
I
SNMP
traps.
What OID should/do I use for sending traps with free-form text? Do I just
use sysDescr? Or is there another OID that's recommended?
Regards,
Frank
to try their chat
feature on their support site.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Barry Shein
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 12:40 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Any earthlink mail admins?
I can't get thru via their abuse
Rather than go after distilled water via reverse osmosis, I think a carbon
filter would be a good place to start.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean
Donelan
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 8:39 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject
Are you talking about Wi-Fi? I believe IBM's connection manager can do
that.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Raymond L. Corbin
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 9:12 PM
To: nanog
Subject: Running Application when Network Connection
To be clear, should one be white listing *all* the addresses suggested in
RFC 2142?
Regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe
Greco
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 8:30 AM
To: Eliot Lear
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re
If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel planning
beyond adding more channel blankets.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Carl Karsten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 10:56 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adrian Chadd
of this
single-channel architecture, and the possible concerns that a network
planner might have around the requirement to have L1 connectivity from
Extricom's APs to their switch, are better discussed in another forum.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Elmar K. Bins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Casey Callendrello
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1:20 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
Hard-earned knowledge:
Meru's single
in laptops are becoming more prevalent, it's
possible to get 30 to 50% of your user population using 802.11a.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel
Jaeggli
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 11:51 PM
To: Adrian Chadd
Cc: Suresh
jerky.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stefan Bethke
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 11:38 PM
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Hey, SiteFinder is back, again...
Am 05.11.2007 um 17:16 schrieb Stephane
symmetrical. (I'm making the underlying presumption that copper-based
symmetric technologies will not become part of residential broadband market
any time in the near future, if ever.)
Until the time that we are all FTTH, ISPs will continue to manage their
customer's upstream links.
Regards,
Frank
Ah, but the reality is that you *think* you're paying for something, but the
operator never really intended to deliver it to you.
If anything, we need better full-disclosure, preferably voluntarily, and if
not that way, legislatively required.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
subscribers.
If it's download, that's a whole other ball of wax, and not what drove
Comcast to do what they're doing, and not the apparent concern of at least
North American ISPs today.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED
limitations or P2P control because that would be bad for
marketing.
Frank
From: Dorn Hetzel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 8:12 AM
To: Joe Greco
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: BitTorrent swarms have a deadly bite on broadband nets
How
Here's timely article: KDDI says 900k target for fibre users 'difficult'
http://www.telegeography.com/cu/article.php?article_id=20215email=html
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Andersen
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:21 PM
,
but then ISPs could purchase cheaper bandwidth for that.
But perhaps at the end of the day Andrew O. is right and it's best off to
have a single queue and throw more bandwidth at the problem.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel
a marketing tool to attract
customers. Only in business models where bandwidth (local, transport, or
otherwise) is expensive has usage-based billing become a reality.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Crist Clark
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007
.
DOCSIS 2.0 adds support for higher levels of modulation on the upstream,
plus wider bandwidth
(http://i.cmpnet.com/commsdesign/csd/2002/jun02/imedia-fig1.gif), but still
not enough to compensate for the higher downstreams possible with channel
bonding in DOCSIS 3.0.
Frank
-Original Message
With PCMM (PacketCable Multimedia,
http://www.cedmagazine.com/out-of-the-lab-into-the-wild.aspx) support it's
possible to dynamically adjust service flows, as has been done with
Comcast's Powerboost. There also appears to be support for flow
prioritization.
Regards,
Frank
-Original
/modular_CMTS.html), you're really
changing an MSO's architecture. Not that I'm dissing it, as that may be
what's necessary to deal with the upstream bandwidth constraint, but that's
a future vision, not a current reality.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
. population.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leo
Bicknell
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:55 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: BitTorrent swarms have a deadly bite on broadband nets
In a message written on Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:24
Have you tried this form?
http://www.comcastsupport.com/Forms/NET/blockedprovider.asp
Frank
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Raymond L. Corbin
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 4:30 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Any Comcast Mail/Sysadmins?
Hey,
I'm
You're right, they've shuffled things around.
Try this form:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/yahoomail/postmaster/defer.html
Regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Justin Wilson
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 8:55 AM
' maximum capabilities based on current technology?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 9:11 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: New TransPacific Cable Projects:
Not to mention
Make sense what you said, I'm just pretty sure that eventually they'll come
up with a way to put 100 to 500 waves on it.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Rod Beck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@merit.edu
of plant contributes to the cost study, so it may end
up having zero cost in the end.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wayne E. Bouchard
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 7:00 PM
To: Justin M. Streiner
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re
structural supports installed after the fact to support
them.
Frank
---
On Wed Sep 12 10:10 , Joe Greco sent:
If you find any pictures of NY.NET; Terry Kennedy made the above
look sloppy. Many places ban cable ties due to the sharp ends;
some allow 'em if tensioned by a pistol-grip
Duke runs both Cisco's distributed and autonomous APs, I believe. Kevin's
report on EDUCAUSE mentioned autonomous APs, but with details as hazy as
they are right now, I don't dare say whether one system or another caused or
received the problem.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
that it involves either L3 roaming or two or more WLCs
that share a common L2 network. Most wireless clients don't roam in such a
big way.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Iljitsch van Beijnum
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 4:35 PM
To: Prof
networks in the event of a network failure.
snip
Of course, these offerings are still being productized, so it remains to be
seen what terms and conditions they carry, and how they will be priced.
Frank
==
On Fri Jun 22 11:56 , Sean Donelan sent:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Hank Nussbacher wrote
To clarify my last post, and to partly correct it, I was referring to VZ's new
TPE China cable, where I mentioned pending pricing and TC information. Of
course, VZ already meshes its IP backbones, as a matter of course today, in
existing systems.
Frank A. Coluccio
DTI Consulting Inc.
212-587
Please provide a pingable IP address on each block so that we can check.
Thanks,
Frank
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 1:09 PM
To: 'nanog@merit.edu'
Subject: IP Block 99/8
Hi,
I am Shai from Rogers Cable Inc. ISP in Canada. We have IP block
99.x.x.x assigned to our
server, and then block destination port 25 on the cable modem. For
alternative access technologies, block destination port 25 on the access
gear or core routers/firewalls.
Regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 7:48 AM
To: Mikael Abrahamsson
Cc
it
would save their abuse department in the long run.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 5:10 PM
To: 'nanog@merit.edu'
Subject: Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 07:44:59AM -0500, Frank Bulk wrote:
Comcast is known to emit
Comcast is known to emit lots of abuse -- are you blocking all their
networks today?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 7:43 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 09:50:34PM +, Fergie
like a good idea, but I'm guessing few network operators
do that for their customer networks, whether that's due to lack of
centralization or cost.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 3:49 PM
To: 'nanog@merit.edu'
Subject: RE: Abuse procedures... Reality
? My DSL and cable modem subscribers are
spread across a dozen non-contiguous /24s. If the bothered network is upset
with one of my cable modem subs and blocks just one /24 they will open
themselves up when that CPE obtains a new IP in a different /24.
Frank
-Original Message-
From
IP in separate
sub-block that is only being punished for the behavior of others in a
different sub-block.
Frank
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:20 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: ICANNs role [was: Re: On-going ...]
I think the shutdown
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
