On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:20:53AM -0800, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Rod Beck wrote:
I am suggesting a Certified Drinkers Event in the hotel bar Sunday evening.
Any Hash House Harriers in our midst?
The thought of the cross-section of society that would partake in both
NANOG and H^3 is rather
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:51:38PM -0400, Alex Pilosov wrote:
[...]
Analog modem and voice line and TAP software (like sendpage or qpage)
I like the TAP route with qpage.
I was starting to get spam via my provider's e-mail to SMS gateway. They were
kind enough to disable it, and we use TAP
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 07:12:54AM -0400, Jason LeBlanc wrote:
OT: He probably meant MOP and LAT are not routable, man that brings back
memories.
Yeah, I realy did, but my fingers typed 'decnet isn't routable' because
that how the folks I worked with at the time described the issue. I was
Is anyone out there setting up routing boundaries differently for
IPv4 and IPv6? I'm setting up a network where it seems to make
sense to route IPv4, while bridging IPv6 -- but I can be talked
out of it rather easily.
Years ago, I worked on a academic network where we had a mix
of IPX, DECnet,
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:51:39PM -0800, Jason Arnaute wrote:
[...]
Or am I just getting ripped off ?
I have actually seen contracts that have current pricing over
$200/Mbps -- but the person responsible isn't allowed to
negotiate on transit prices anymore. :-)
(To be fair, at the time
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:29:05AM -0400, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:
[...] I'm in favor of having
the election not happen during a meeting, period, since that will
underscore the fact that eligibility is not limited to those
physically present. Longer voting windows = good.
I agree that the
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 07:05:44PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
[...]
I think one of the major problems is that very few people know
how to, or are capable of sending larger g711 frames (at increased
delay, but more data per packet) because they can't set these more granular
settings on
delivering the mail
because it is likely to get us put on a blacklist.
We haven't fleshed things out completely, because we're not sure
the cure is better than the disease yet...
--
John Osmon
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 07:53:13PM -0400, Robert Blayzor wrote:
Has anyone else noticed any strange problems lately when querying
UltraDNS for name server records?
Not for name server records, but we do have a glue record in .org that
pops up when querying one ultradns.net TLD nameserver,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 12:03:32PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Jeff Shultz, WIllamette Valley Internet wrote:
** Reply to message from Drew Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 19 Apr 2004
13:42:53 -0400
[...notification of the...]
average home Dial-Up users who were
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:15:11AM -0500, Douglas S. Peeples wrote:
What you describe is a folded ring and is indicative of either a temporary
solution or bad network design. As a rule, phone companies and capacity
suppliers build very robust systems.
LATA and ILEC boundaries, along with
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 09:37:30PM -0500, Robert M. Enger wrote:
You'd think after three previous disruptions, that Qwest would
have enabled some form of redundancy.
The Washington State PUC doesn't appear to be providing
very good oversight.
Farmington, NM doesn't have any redundancy
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
In the US, American Tower is/was liquidating a number of cold war era
ex-ATT blast-proof sites. They are all in need of an upgrade, but the
basics are there (underground, multiple layers of concrete, blast doors,
etc. Even blast toilets. I'm
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 09:58:27AM -0400, Owens, Shane (EPIK.ORL) wrote:
Does anyone have any current opinions on Williams IP service and any
expected changes with the Chapter 11?
Shane
Can't speak to their service, as I've never bought anything from them.
After multiple spams in the last
14 matches
Mail list logo
