On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:49:48AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
...
I wouldn't be suprised if in a few years some EU/US law mandates IP number
portability, just like people have with their cellphones. Imagine what
that will do to the routing tables. How many /32s can we get into the
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 05:26:09PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hank Nussbacher) writes:
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g08qkYTaNhLlscXKMnS3V8dkc-WwD8UAGH900
they say it's personally identifiable information, not personal property.
EU's concern is the privacy
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:50:04PM -0400, J. Oquendo wrote:
Sean Donelan wrote:
The 365 Main San Francisco data center has published its report
concerning the outage on July 24 after a utility problem.
http://www.365main.com/status_update.html
Other data centers using Hitec backup
Are there any good tools for IPv6 address management?
---
Thanks,
-
Joseph W. Breu, CCNA phone : +1.319.268.5228
Senior Network Administratorfax : +1.319.266.8158
Cedar Falls Utilities cell
Does anyone have any leads on any job posting web sites, or leads or
resumes on managers of data centers in London, England. We are
currently staffing our offices there. Requires significant data
storage expertise. (see backup.com and swapdrive.com)
thanks
Joe Grajewski
thanks everyone for your help on this -- i got some great answers and
great sources of contact -
I was on the phone with the NOC earlier and was informed that they were
having trouble in the DC area. I am seeing problems heading out of their
Philly POP into DC. Some sort of switch or software failure on a switch.
No ETA although things seem to be working on and off right now.
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 10:58:39PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We checked with IANA, ARIN, and the US DoD regarding 7.0.0.0/8. We
were told that this netblock should not see the light of day,
10/8 used to be a DoD address block, but it was also used exclusively in
their blacker
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:25:58PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
And I know a company that has been using 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, 6/8,
7/8 and 8/8 for many years, also behind NAT or on non-Internet connected
networks. But that is not what I am talking about here.
...
And what happens
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 01:34:01AM +, Stephen Stuart wrote:
...
Or better yet, 11/8 (to make 10/7)?
...
To step on yet another already-allocated block of IP addresses? Let's
not try to hard to shoot ourselves in our collective feet.
--
Joe Yao
Analex Contractor
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:11:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Yes there are. The current whois returns way more information on a query
than you need for network operations. That's because the current whois
was designed back in the 1970's so that ARPANET network managers could
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:30:32AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I also find it curious that you claim to have people on staff at your
company who know what SWIP means. Perhaps you could ask them to share
that information with us since I have never seen this documented
anywhere. Do they
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:54:39PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 06:15:34PM -0500,
J. Oquendo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 24 lines which said:
was successfully configured by NASA Glenn Research Center to use
IPsec and IPv6 technologies in space.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:10:59PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
...
Second, who said v6 was the heights? ...
My, aren't we serious? Too serious to realize that satellites are a
little higher than I, at least, can reach.
--
Joe Yao
Analex Contractor
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:55:38PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
...
What purpose does an identity check serve? How do you verify the
identity? If a domain name is already registered, what value is there
to the identity check? What identity are you verifying? The
individual requesting the
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:06:18AM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
...
If you seriously want to propose something:
If you're going to do any vetting, the time to do it is at registration,
not at crunch time.
If what you're talking about is the identity of the person registering,
yes.
If what
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 02:05:41PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
...
Yes, that's nice, except that Joe Greco isn't authorized to do that.
We're not talking about a system operating in a vacuum here. There
are already established mechanisms for guarding domains. We're talking
about rapid update
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:56:00PM -0500, Gadi Evron wrote:
...
I just posted this, and I believe it makes sense:
Title: Put Security Alongside .XXX
Isn't security as important to discuss as .XSS?
The DNS has become an abuse infrastructure, it is no longer just a
functional
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:16:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again - DNS is the infrastructure for EVERYTHING. It facilitates
EVERYTHING.
Not so. On the public Internet applications like Edonkey and Emule work
fine without it. We run a global IP network that is not connected to
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:29:27PM +0100, Sam Stickland wrote:
...
Maybe it would make sense for someone to reiterate what types of abuse
DNS is facilitating? I believe what Gadi was getting at was mainly the
ability to use fake details to register a domain, and then very rapidly
cycling
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 09:18:07PM -0500, Gadi Evron wrote:
There is a current on-going Internet emergency: ...
Having just read and deleted somewhere between 100 and 400 messages on
this, I don't really want to add to the noise. I hope there's some
signal here.
One thing is clear, that Gadi
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 05:33:08PM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
On Apr 2, 2007, at 4:56 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
The recommendation was for registries to provide a preview of the
next day's zone.
I think this might be a bit in conflict with efforts registries have
to reduce the
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 01:39:31PM -0500, Team Whiner wrote:
...
Thank you and Happy April Fools.
Thank you and amusing but 10.342 hours early.
--
Joe Yao
Analex Contractor
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 09:53:19PM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote:
...
This is getting far afield from 'network operations', but the underlying
issue is really quite simple: There are *NO*PENALTIES* for registering
'bogus' domains. The registry operator has -no- (financial) incentive
to
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:34:27AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first true April Fools' Day RFC
(748) is about to celebrate its 29th
birthday. There was none last year.
But Tom Limoncelli and I have collected
all the RFCs together with some bonus
material.
Bonus material
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 08:31:59AM -0500, Dave Pooser wrote:
...
Our marketing guy was the IS Manager before I cam on board, and still helps
cover for me when I'm on vacation or otherwise out of town. So in addition
to his real business cards he has some that have Backup Information
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:49:36AM -0400, Donald Stahl wrote:
...
Has anyone thought to clearly define these titles somewhere so that
everyone can standardize on them?
There are SAGE System Administrator levels, well defined and accepted by
most of those who have heard of them. Would they
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 01:01:40PM +, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
One of my blog-related interests is the career of Russian arms dealer
Viktor Bout. I recently checked out the namebase.org social network
diagram for him...and was a little surprised to see where our very own
Paul Vixie
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:16:37AM -0800, Peter Thoenen wrote:
[Thoenen seems to have clipped the attribution]
Perhaps,
bogon acls are helpful when they are configured on backbone, but not
everywhere.
And if ever major backbones (read tier 2/3) would do so all us little
guys
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:22:51PM -0600, Gadi Evron wrote:
...
2. If you haven't already, I strongly recommend checking your network for
machines running telnet, and more specifcially, vulnerable to this
particular issue.
NO. The telnet DAEMON. NOT telnet. *sigh* Too many releases
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 05:12:05AM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
warning-- this thread is so far off topic, i can't even REMEMBER a topic
that it might once have had. hit D now.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barry Shein) writes:
... If your goal is invasion then value preservation is important
Well this is off topic.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Disher
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:51 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Virtual Global Task Force Conference Invitation
This is from Travis Haymore of
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:50:20PM +0100, Per Heldal wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:13 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Sure, just find these few simple things that will actually improve
security. (My personal one would be Erase MS-Windows and install
Ubuntu. If we are ready to
I didn't know verisign was a transit provider. Anyone use em?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of brett watson
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 10:15 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: death of the net predicted by deloitte -- film at
My CIO is convinced that Google is going to take over the internet and
everyone will pay google for access. He also believes that google will
release their own protocol some sort of Google IP which everyone will
have to pay for also.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 08:32:10AM -0500, Fox,Thomas wrote:
...
3. Pay all of your bill except for the disputed portion. ...
...
Along with all that good advice, this particular one may bite you back.
Consult legal experts in the field.
--
Joe Yao
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 08:19:12AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IPv6 makes NAT obsolete because IPv6 firewalls can provide all
the useful features of IPv4 NAT without any of the downsides.
IPv6 firewalls? Where? Good ones?
Why good ones. NAT is a basic IPv4 firewall. All
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 08:04:25PM -, Mark D. Kaye wrote:
Hi,
PIX/ASA Supports IPv6 Apparently, see below.
Don't know anyone who has tested it yet though ;-)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_
chapter09186a0080636f44.html
Note Failover does
Thinking this out, out loud. Well, in black and white, anyway.
Your vix.com name servers are authoritative for the zone.
If a name server wants to do a lookup on maps.vix.com, it will get it
from cache, or send a query to the listed IP address for one of the name
servers.
You said you had
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:43:52PM -0500, J. Oquendo wrote:
...
A lot of vendor information on this, etc. can be summarized over at
http://www.moonv6.org/ (or at least the hype of it)
...
This is why I asked: at some point last year, those guys said NO
firewalls were IPv6-ready yet.
--
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 01:48:04PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
IPv6 makes NAT obsolete because IPv6 firewalls can provide all
the useful features of IPv4 NAT without any of the downsides.
...
IPv6 firewalls? Where? Good ones?
--
Joe Yao
What about companies that do business under different Dab's? I know of
a lot of companies that do business under different names for different
products.
Joseph
-Original Message-
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 7:04 AM
To: Joe
that don't care about DNS
structure. Damn it they want mazdausa.com and not usa.mazda.com and
they will have it their way!
At least that's how it is most places I've seen.
Joseph
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Travis H.
Sent: Wednesday
Somewhere in the following confused ramble may actually be the only
cogent argument for top-posting I've seen.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:52:29AM +, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
For those of us who read nanog from a mobile device, it's incredibly
annoying to have no content in the first
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 02:14:43PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Anyway, I wouldn't write a letter with nothing worth reading on the
first page. I don't write articles with nothing in the first
paragraph.
Nor do I, but there is a well-established tradition
in written English of
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 03:07:23PM -0500, Matthew Walker wrote:
Issue was resolved at 1:35 pm. Thank you for the many replies.
The response when I called Comcast was:
Sorry Sir, We are doing Maintenance, the pipes were dirty, and they were
cleaning them'. I asked, which pipes, and they
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:26:00AM +1300, Mark Foster wrote:
...
But there are worse offenses. HTML emails - every author has a choice
there, so that ones unforgivable IMHO. Top-Posting and Legalese Addendums
to messages are both things that an end-user in a COE corporate
environment has
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:04:17PM -0800, Payam wrote:
Should have said... I wasn't aware that the Internet was a Male ...
that needed cleaning of the pipes and see what they would have said! hahah
either way... go comcast go!
-Payam
I'm sorry, you'll have to explain that one to me.
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 12:53:23AM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 4-jan-2007, at 0:31, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
According to
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-TechBit-Wikipedia-
Block.html
all of Qatar appears on the net as a single IP address.
I wonder what they
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 02:19:36PM -0800, The Shadow wrote:
Question:
Why is it that every company out there allows connections through their
firewalls to their web and mail infrastructure from countries that they
don't even do business in. Shouldn't it be our default to only allow US
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:53:04AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
(Hint - how much smaller would the spam problem be if end users actually
looked at their cable or DSL modem and wondered why the Tx/Rx lights were
on steady even though nothing was apparently happening?)
You appear to be
companies and I mention NANOG most of them brush it off
and say The NANOG people are the past and what they have to say doesn't
matter anymore.
That's the general feel I get from others when it concerns NANOG.
Joseph
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Niels Bakker
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:31 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Curious question on hop identity...
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Jackson) [Fri 15 Dec 2006, 00:11
CET]:
I'm pretty
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:49:25PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
This is an excellent idea, but please do not select the first block
after 16 bit numbers are up (can you say buffer overflow?). Something
random, in the middle, would be better.
2752512-2818047 ?
I had ultradns calling also but told them we weren't at a place to use
their product and they said ok and let me be. They were always
professional on the phone.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andy Davidson
Sent: Tuesday, November 28,
So, what happened on 23 October, since you're putting this up for
examination?
--
Joe Yao
---
This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 05:38:05PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
...
I am way too familiar with several cases where people were charged and
convicted with violating obscure laws clearly intended for another purpose
just for doing their jobs in a normal, reasonable way. Intel v. Schwartz (no
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:10:05PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
As pointed out by Rob Seastrom in private email, RFC2182 addresses things
of biblical proportions - such as dispersion of nameservers geographically
and topologically. Having 3 secondaries, only one of them on separate /24,
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 05:51:17AM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
In recent memory, I can think of two large collocation
centers that retain your ID. One is in Miami and one in New York (I don't
think I need to name names, most of you know to which I refer).
All others
(including ATT)
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:26:08AM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
At 22:43 -0400 10/23/06, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
I've noticed of late less understanding of DNS in the people charged
with maintaining it out there. Sad.
Sad? I don't think so, it's natural and a sign of the technology's
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:40:24AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
...
The issue still stands though, that according to my
latest dig +trace of it, I see :
185.28.69.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS dns.iad.llns.net.
185.28.69.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 03:06:57PM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I once was going to a meeting at a colo in Tysons Corner, which will
remain nameless (but you would know it).
Like most of them, it wasn't well marked, and we couldn't find it.
Three of us wound up walking through an
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 06:03:22PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
Hi,
I seem to be having a problem. Limelight has SWIP'd
69.28.185.0/24 to me, and I asked for IN-ADDR.ARPA control.
I recently went to check and it seemed not to be working
right. I sent them an email around 11p
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 09:13:03PM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
At 18:48 -0400 10/23/06, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
No, because in fact you can. There is nothing magic about an
in-addr.arpa domain.
I'd say there is some magic. Possibly.
There are conventions. There is RFC 2317
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:36:41AM -0400, Joe Loiacono wrote:
Notice the date: October 10. That is the Indian equivalent of our April 1.
Ah. Culture clash. Therefore the story can be relegated to the same
coop as the IP-carrying pigeons.
The sole justification for asking this is to help us
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:16:05PM -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
...
It's 10/10, which if viewed as the binary number 1010 is 10 base 10.
Surely that has to mean something! (Well, I just made it up, but it
sounds goodd)
...
Steve, think about it. For all base N, N 1, 10 base 10 is
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:36:03AM -0700, Gregory Hicks wrote:
...
My wife (Korean) tole me yesterday that the past weekend was Chusok
(or Korean 'Thanksgiving' - Actually, the Harvest Festival)... So
maybe India has something similar...?
...
But why would the Harvest Festival be the
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:53:56PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
...
Drew the attention of a friend at AOL to this and got a reply quoted
below - this was apparently an issue at AOL's end. Thanks to AOL for
quickly acting to fix this.
I've been asked by my friend to post this below
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:24:30AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:58:42AM +0100, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
I'm a little surprised they came back up. I can certainly see the
benefit for the regime to have - unavoidably, no money! - no Internet
for the public
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:22:34AM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
...
Who thinks it would be a good idea to have a knob such that ICMP
error messages are always source from a certain IP address on a router?
...
I've sometimes thought it would be useful when I wanted to hide a route.
But
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:38:15AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
at least a rather updated version of ucb mail, that also does imap /
pop / ssl / smtp + auth etc
heirloom mailx aka nail - http://nail.sourceforge.net
Try: http://heirloom.sourceforge.net/mailx.html. Moved to
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:37:40PM -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On 21 Sep 2006 17:01:45 +, Paul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul, what exponent does the new key use? (I clicked on the public key
link, but I can't decode the base64 that easily...)
it was made with bind9's
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:39:51PM +, Fergie wrote:
Hmmm. It wouldn't have anything to do with prime numbers, now would
it? :-)
Well, yes, but there are an infinite number of them.
Of course, 17 is the most prime of them all.
--
Joe Yao
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:14:27AM -0700, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
something in HTML that i can not parse...
care to repost in a format that is readable?
Bill, it's really time for you to upgrade from UCB Mail to
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 02:59:47PM -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote:
An e-mail message *can* in fact, be HTML, as HTML is a text payload
like any other.
Yes, and for those, one may use:
/etc/mailcap:text/html; lynx %s; print=lynx -dump %s | lp
But for some reason, that particular message
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 05:04:53PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:23:46 EDT, Todd Vierling said:
Which is just one of the reasons that the MIME type
multipart/alternative exists. Sane MUAs that wish to send HTML also
send a text/plain alternative segment in the
.
Thanks
Joseph
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 12:18:59PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
...
Even if you assume that allocations made by ARIN are not property, it's
hard to argue that pre-ARIN allocations are not. They're not subject to
revocation and their grant wasn't conditioned on compliance with policies.
I wish the article had more info since I have been wondering how a
software upgrade downed the entire zone. Wasn't there any backup
servers? Did they not test the upgrade before hand? I know I'd lose my
job if I upgraded our dns servers all at once with out testing.
-Original
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:51:34AM -0400, J. Oquendo wrote:
Can someone from Qwest shoot me an email. I have a PSTN carrier routing
VoIP now and they're telling me your routing tables became corrupt or
something. Calls have been a dropping.
That whois stuff is meaningless. When are people going to get it that
it really isn't a hack.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jon R. Kibler
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 1:36 PM
To: Elijah Savage
Cc: Brandon Galbraith; [EMAIL
Do modern laptops have disk drives that are that hard to remove?
--
Joe Yao
---
This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 02:28:33AM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
Do modern laptops have disk drives that are that hard to remove?
one screw and 'pop' out comes all dell laptop harddrives... or boot from
cd, usb-copy all data, slide back
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 09:31:52PM -0500, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
Do modern laptops have disk drives that are that hard to remove?
Let us say No, they are not that hard to remove.
Now what? (Recall that this thread started with a situation where
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:25:40AM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote:
...
Let me try to become Gadi. First of all block port 80 (http) :)
Next block port 53 udp (dns).
Now you have got rid of amplification attacks because spoofing does
no longer work and you have got rid of all those silly users
Title: Re: Sitefinder II, the sequel...
If its their corp IT peopl. Oh well they should get over it. If isp vote with your dollars.
-Original Message-
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue Jul 11 00:09:25 2006
To: Steve Sobol
Cc: Joseph Jackson; [EMAIL
I agree. I think this isn't a bad service. If people want to run it
more power to them.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Golding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 12:22 PM
To: 'Stephane Bortzmeyer'; 'Steve Sobol'
Cc: Joseph Jackson; [EMAIL PROTECTED
Behalf Of Florian Weimer
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 6:58 AM
To: Mark Newton
Cc: Seth Johnson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal
* Mark Newton:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 09:39:50AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Mark Newton:
On Tue, Jul
Title: RE: Sitefinder II, the sequel...
Nice troll.
-Original Message-
From: Gerry Boudreaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon Jul 10 06:45:33 2006
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sitefinder II, the sequel...
It is not VeriSign this time.
For those who have not yet seen this:
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:37:02AM -0500, Gadi Evron wrote:
This is a call for papers for a DA Workshop (ISOTF/TISF DA). Its name is:
Internet Security Operations and Intelligence Workshop or ISOI for short.
DA stands for Drone Armies (botnets), which is the main subject of this
workshop.
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:32:11PM +0200, Sabri Berisha wrote:
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 05:20:04PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Hi,
Finally, we crawled the archives of the big lists and have come
up with a list of subscribers who haven't posted in over 9 months, we
plan to set the
Title: RE: DNS Based Load Balancers
What would be a better solution then?
-Original Message-
From: Lincoln Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue Jul 04 18:30:00 2006
To: 'Rodrick Brown'; 'Sam Stickland'
Cc: 'Matt Ghali'; 'Patrick W. Gilmore'; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: DNS
F5 BigIP appears quite good. If you add their 3DNS software, you get
wide-IP's as well.
--
Joe Yao
---
This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 03:49:50PM -0700, Matthew Petach wrote:
(I think these were the toughest to take notes on, since they went
by so fast; took the most cleaning up afterwards. But they were also
the best talks of the 3 days. I wish we could have flipped, and taken
more time on
Moving to nanog-futures. Or trying, anyway.
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 04:45:30PM +0200, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
On the DLV thread, but not responding to anybody in particular.
As soon as you allow people to attend 1 talk for free, then you opened the
door for people attending without
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:37:08AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
...
can you say does not scale? ...
...
I think ISC very clearly already said that. They do not WANT it to
scale. They _WANT_ DNSSEC to succeed and take over. This is a
bootstrap mechanism to get DNSSEC rolling.
--
Joe Yao
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 03:21:23PM -0700, Gregory Hicks wrote:
From: Randy Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:16:50 -0700
To: Paul Vixie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday
therefore registrars (like alice's...
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:12:25PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jun 8, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
(sorry these are coming out delayed, I had to deal with an internal
routing challenge
for much of yesterday afternoon. --Matt)
I think I speak for the whole list when
It may not matter a lot, but a number of those prefixes are marked
Reserved to IANA. Nobody should be advertising them.
Which is worse - the ones nobody should be advertising or the ones
somebody else should be advertising? That depends partly on the why.
--
Joe Yao
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 05:19:33PM +0200, Gunther Stammwitz wrote:
Hallo colleagues,
Maybe someone of you can help me to understand the phenomenon of pack loss
when using asynchronous routing?
I have customers who are complaining about packet loss and they are
providing me with MTRs
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
