Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal

On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:49:48AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: ... > I wouldn't be suprised if in a few years some EU/US law mandates IP number > portability, just like people have with their cellphones. Imagine what > that will do to the routing tables. How many /32s can we get into the >

Re: EU Official: IP Is Personal

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 05:26:09PM +, Paul Vixie wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hank Nussbacher) writes: > > > http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g08qkYTaNhLlscXKMnS3V8dkc-WwD8UAGH900 > > they say it's personally identifiable information, not personal property. > EU's concern is the privacy

OT: Can a MSN/hotmail.com email admin contact me offlist?

ow up on their SNDS service. Please contact me offlist so we can get this resolved. -- Thanks, ----- Joseph W. Breu, CCNA phone : +1.319.268.5228 Senior Network Administratorfax : +1.319.266.8158 Cedar Falls Utiliti

Re: 365 Main reason for outage report published

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:50:04PM -0400, J. Oquendo wrote: > Sean Donelan wrote: > > > > > >The 365 Main San Francisco data center has published its report > >concerning the outage on July 24 after a utility problem. > > > >http://www.365main.com/status_update.html > > > >Other data centers usin

RE: Where did freeipdb IP utility site go?

Are there any "good" tools for IPv6 address management? --- Thanks, ----- Joseph W. Breu, CCNA phone : +1.319.268.5228 Senior Network Administratorfax : +1.319.266.8158 Cedar Falls Utilities

re Data Center Managers Needed in London

Does anyone have any leads on any job posting web sites, or leads or resumes on managers of data centers in London, England. We are currently staffing our offices there. Requires significant data storage expertise. (see backup.com and swapdrive.com) thanks Joe Grajewski

colocation facilities in Britain

thanks everyone for your help on this -- i got some great answers and great sources of contact -

Re: What happened to Cogent?

I was on the phone with the NOC earlier and was informed that they were having trouble in the DC area. I am seeing problems heading out of their Philly POP into DC. Some sort of switch or software failure on a switch. No ETA although things seem to be working on and off right now.

Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 01:34:01AM +, Stephen Stuart wrote: ... > Or better yet, 11/8 (to make 10/7)? ... To step on yet another already-allocated block of IP addresses? Let's not try to hard to shoot ourselves in our collective feet. -- Joe Yao Analex Contractor

Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8

On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 11:25:58PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > And I know a company that has been using 1/8, 2/8, 3/8, 4/8, 5/8, 6/8, > 7/8 and 8/8 for many years, also behind NAT or on non-Internet connected > networks. But that is not what I am talking about here. ... And what happen

Re: Question on 7.0.0.0/8

On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 10:58:39PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > We checked with IANA, ARIN, and the US DoD regarding 7.0.0.0/8. We > > were told that this netblock should not see the light of day, > > 10/8 used to be a DoD address block, but it was also used exclusively in > their bl

Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:10:59PM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: ... > Second, who said v6 was "the heights"? ... My, aren't we serious? Too serious to realize that satellites are a little higher than I, at least, can reach. -- Joe Yao Analex Contractor

Re: IPv6 Finally gets off the ground

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:54:39PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 06:15:34PM -0500, > J. Oquendo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 24 lines which said: > > > was successfully configured by NASA Glenn Research Center to use > > IPsec and IPv6 technologies

Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:30:32AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > I also find it curious that you claim to have people on staff at your > company who know what SWIP means. Perhaps you could ask them to share > that information with us since I have never seen this documented > anywhere. Do t

Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:11:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > Yes there are. The current whois returns way more information on a query > than you need for network operations. That's because the current whois > was designed back in the 1970's so that ARPANET network managers could > iden

Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role]

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 02:05:41PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote: ... > Yes, that's nice, except that Joe Greco isn't authorized to do that. > We're not talking about a system operating in a vacuum here. There > are already established mechanisms for guarding domains. We're talking > about rapid update

Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role]

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:06:18AM -0500, Joe Greco wrote: ... > If you seriously want to propose something: > > If you're going to do any vetting, the time to do it is at registration, > not at crunch time. If what you're talking about is the identity of the person registering, yes. If what y

Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role]

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:55:38PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote: ... > What purpose does an identity check serve? How do you verify the > identity? If a domain name is already registered, what value is there > to the "identity" check? What identity are you verifying? The > individual requesting the

Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role]

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 11:29:27PM +0100, Sam Stickland wrote: ... > Maybe it would make sense for someone to reiterate what types of abuse > DNS is facilitating? I believe what Gadi was getting at was mainly the > ability to use fake details to register a domain, and then very rapidly > cyclin

Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role]

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:16:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Again - DNS is the infrastructure for EVERYTHING. It facilitates > > EVERYTHING. > > Not so. On the public Internet applications like Edonkey and Emule work > fine without it. We run a global IP network that is not connect

Re: summarising [was: Re: ICANNs role]

On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:56:00PM -0500, Gadi Evron wrote: ... > I just posted this, and I believe it makes sense: > > Title: Put Security Alongside .XXX > > Isn't security as important to discuss as .XSS? > > The DNS has become an abuse infrastructure, it is no longer just a > functional infr

Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names

On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 09:53:19PM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote: ... > This is getting far afield from 'network operations', but the underlying > issue is really quite simple: There are *NO*PENALTIES* for registering > 'bogus' domains. The registry operator has -no- (financial) incentive > to inve

Re: Month of NANOG Bugs

On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 01:39:31PM -0500, Team Whiner wrote: ... > Thank you and Happy April Fools. Thank you and amusing but 10.342 hours early. -- Joe Yao Analex Contractor

Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names

On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 05:33:08PM -0700, David Conrad wrote: > > On Apr 2, 2007, at 4:56 PM, Douglas Otis wrote: > >The recommendation was for registries to provide a preview of the > >next day's zone. > > I think this might be a bit in conflict with efforts registries have > to reduce the

Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 09:18:07PM -0500, Gadi Evron wrote: > There is a current on-going Internet emergency: ... Having just read and deleted somewhere between 100 and 400 messages on this, I don't really want to add to the noise. I hope there's some signal here. One thing is clear, that Gadi

Re: April Fools' Day

On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:34:27AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The first true April Fools' Day RFC > (748) is about to celebrate its 29th > birthday. There was none last year. > > But Tom Limoncelli and I have collected > all the RFCs together with some "bonus > material." > > Bonus

Re: NOC Personel Question (Possibly OT)

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:49:36AM -0400, Donald Stahl wrote: ... > Has anyone thought to clearly define these titles somewhere so that > everyone can standardize on them? There are SAGE System Administrator levels, well defined and accepted by most of those who have heard of them. Would they

Re: NOC Personel Question (Possibly^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^HTruly OT)

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 08:31:59AM -0500, Dave Pooser wrote: ... > Our marketing guy was the IS Manager before I cam on board, and still helps > cover for me when I'm on vacation or otherwise out of town. So in addition > to his "real" business cards he has some that have Backup Information > Tech

Re: NOC Personel Question (Possibly OT)

On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 07:47:26PM -0600, Todd Christell wrote: > > Greetings, > > Sorry if this is OT but we are having a discussion with our HR > department. We are in the process of getting a 24 X 7 NOC in place and > HR has a problem with calling them NOC Specialist. What is the > generall

Can someone from aol.com postmaster support contact me offlist?

We have been working with your organization to get a machine off of your blacklist for several weeks - to no avail. Thanks. -- Thanks, - Joseph W. Breu, CCNA phone : +1.319.268.5228 Senior Network Administratorfax

Re: Paul Vixie: Suspected Arms Dealer

On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 01:01:40PM +, Alexander Harrowell wrote: > > One of my blog-related interests is the career of Russian arms dealer > Viktor Bout. I recently checked out the namebase.org social network > diagram for him...and was a little surprised to see where our very own > Paul Vixi

RE: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ?

dwidth would be if he bought it directly from them. Joseph

Re: single homed public-peer bandwidth ... pricing survey ?

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:51:39PM -0800, Jason Arnaute wrote: > > Hello, > > I am currently hosted in a small, independent > datacenter that has 4 or 5 public peers (L3, Sprint, > UUnet, AT&T and ... ?) > > They are a very nice facility, very technical and > professional, and have real peopl

Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons

On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:16:37AM -0800, Peter Thoenen wrote: [Thoenen seems to have clipped the attribution] > > Perhaps, > > bogon acls are helpful when they are configured on backbone, but not > > > > everywhere. > > And if ever major backbones (read tier 2/3) would do so all us little >

Re: Solaris telnet vuln solutions digest and network risks

On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:22:51PM -0600, Gadi Evron wrote: ... > 2. If you haven't already, I strongly recommend checking your network for > machines running telnet, and more specifcially, vulnerable to this > particular issue. NO. The telnet DAEMON. NOT telnet. *sigh* Too many releases con

RE: Virtual Global Task Force Conference Invitation

Well this is off topic. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jonathan Disher > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:51 PM > To: nanog@merit.edu > Subject: Virtual Global Task Force Conference Invitation > > > This is from Travis Haymor

Re: Every incident is an opportunity

On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 05:12:05AM +, Paul Vixie wrote: > > warning-- this thread is so far off topic, i can't even REMEMBER a topic > that it might once have had. hit D now. >  > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Barry Shein) writes: > > > ... If your goal is invasion then value preservation is impor

Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers)

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:50:20PM +0100, Per Heldal wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:13 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > Sure, just find these few simple things that will actually improve > > security. (My personal one would be "Erase MS-Windows and install > > Ubuntu". If we are ready t

RE: death of the net predicted by deloitte -- film at 11

My CIO is convinced that Google is going to take over the internet and everyone will pay google for access. He also believes that google will release their own protocol some sort of Google IP which everyone will have to pay for also. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [m

RE: death of the net predicted by deloitte -- film at 11

I didn't know verisign was a transit provider. Anyone use em? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of brett watson > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 10:15 AM > To: nanog@merit.edu > Subject: Re: death of the net predicted by deloitte -- fil

Re: Question about SLAs

On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 08:32:10AM -0500, Fox,Thomas wrote: ... > 3. Pay all of your bill except for the disputed portion. ... ... Along with all that good advice, this particular one may bite you back. Consult legal experts in the field. -- Joe Yao ---

Re: what the heck do i do now?

Thinking this out, out loud. Well, in black and white, anyway. Your vix.com name servers are authoritative for the zone. If a name server wants to do a lookup on maps.vix.com, it will get it from cache, or send a query to the listed IP address for one of the name servers. You said you had trie

Re: Google wants to be your Internet

On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 08:04:25PM -, Mark D. Kaye wrote: > > Hi, > > PIX/ASA Supports IPv6 Apparently, see below. > > Don't know anyone who has tested it yet though ;-) > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_ > chapter09186a0080636f44.html "Note Failo

Re: Google wants to be your Internet

On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 08:19:12AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > IPv6 makes NAT obsolete because IPv6 firewalls can provide all > > > the useful features of IPv4 NAT without any of the downsides. > > > IPv6 firewalls? Where? Good ones? > > Why good ones. NAT is a basic IPv4 fir

Re: IPv6 Firewalls

On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:43:52PM -0500, J. Oquendo wrote: ... > A lot of vendor information on this, etc. can be summarized over at > http://www.moonv6.org/ (or at least the hype of it) ... This is why I asked: at some point last year, those guys said NO firewalls were IPv6-ready yet. -- J

Re: Google wants to be your Internet

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 01:48:04PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > IPv6 makes NAT obsolete because IPv6 firewalls can provide all > the useful features of IPv4 NAT without any of the downsides. ... IPv6 firewalls? Where? Good ones? -- Joe Yao

RE: HTML email, was Re: Phishing and BGP Blackholing

What about companies that do business under different Dab's? I know of a lot of companies that do business under different names for different products. Joseph -Original Message- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 7:04 AM To

RE: HTML email, was Re: Phishing and BGP Blackholing

that don't care about DNS structure. Damn it they want mazdausa.com and not usa.mazda.com and they will have it their way! At least that's how it is most places I've seen. Joseph -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Travi

Re: Phishing and BGP Blackholing

On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 02:14:43PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > > Anyway, I wouldn't write a letter with nothing worth reading on the > > first page. I don't write articles with nothing in the first > > paragraph. > > Nor do I, but there is a well-established tradition > in written Engl

Re: Phishing and BGP Blackholing

Somewhere in the following confused ramble may actually be the only cogent argument for top-posting I've seen. On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:52:29AM +, Alexander Harrowell wrote: > > For those of us who read nanog from a mobile device, it's incredibly > annoying to have no content in the first

Re: NATting a whole country?

On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 12:53:23AM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > > On 4-jan-2007, at 0:31, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > > >According to > >http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-TechBit-Wikipedia- > >Block.html > >all of Qatar appears on the net as a single IP address. > > I wonde

Re: Comcast Routing Issues: Northern NJ: Random Failures

On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:04:17PM -0800, Payam wrote: > > Should have said... "I wasn't aware that the Internet was a Male ... > that needed cleaning of the pipes" and see what they would have said! hahah > either way... go comcast go! > > -Payam I'm sorry, you'll have to explain that one to

Re: Phishing and BGP Blackholing

On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:26:00AM +1300, Mark Foster wrote: ... > But there are worse offenses. HTML emails - every author has a choice > there, so that ones unforgivable IMHO. Top-Posting and Legalese Addendums > to messages are both things that an end-user in a COE corporate > environment

Re: Comcast Routing Issues: Northern NJ: Random Failures

On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 03:07:23PM -0500, Matthew Walker wrote: > Issue was resolved at 1:35 pm. Thank you for the many replies. > > The response when I called Comcast was: > > Sorry Sir, We are doing Maintenance, the pipes were dirty, and they were > cleaning them'. I asked, which pipes, and t

Re: Security of National Infrastructure

On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 02:19:36PM -0800, The Shadow wrote: > > Question: > Why is it that every company out there allows connections through their > firewalls to their web and mail infrastructure from countries that they > don't even do business in. Shouldn't it be our default to only allow US >

Re: today's Wash Post Business section

On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:53:04AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > (Hint - how much smaller would the spam problem be if end users actually > looked at their cable or DSL modem and wondered why the Tx/Rx lights were > on steady even though nothing was apparently happening?) You appear to b

RE: Curious question on hop identity...

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Niels Bakker Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:31 PM To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Curious question on hop identity... * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Jackson) [Fri 15 Dec 2006, 00:11 CET]: >I'

RE: Curious question on hop identity...

such at larger companies and I mention NANOG most of them brush it off and say "The NANOG people are the past and what they have to say doesn't matter anymore". That's the general feel I get from others when it concerns NANOG. Joseph -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: The IESG Approved the Expansion of the AS Number Registry

On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:49:25PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote: > > Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: > > > > > >This is an excellent idea, but please do not select the first block > >after 16 bit numbers are up (can you say buffer overflow?). Something > >random, in the middle, would be better. > > > 27525

RE: How to stop UltraDNS sales people calling

I had ultradns calling also but told them we weren't at a place to use their product and they said ok and let me be. They were always professional on the phone. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Davidson Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2

Re: ARIN Lawsuit - Comments anyone?

So, what happened on 23 October, since you're putting this up for examination? -- Joe Yao --- This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.

Re: register.com down sev0?

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:10:05PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > As pointed out by Rob Seastrom in private email, RFC2182 addresses things > of biblical proportions - such as dispersion of nameservers geographically > and topologically. Having 3 secondaries, only one of them on separate /2

Re: Collocation Access

On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 05:38:05PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: ... > I am way too familiar with several cases where people were charged and > convicted with violating obscure laws clearly intended for another purpose > just for doing their jobs in a normal, reasonable way. Intel v. Schwartz (no >

Re: Need help explaining in-addr.arpa to Limelight

On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:40:24AM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: ... > The issue still stands though, that according to my > latest dig +trace of it, I see : > > 185.28.69.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS dns.iad.llns.net. > 185.28.69.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN NS dns.lax.ll

Re: state of the world...Re: Need help explaining in-addr.arpa

On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 11:26:08AM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote: > > At 22:43 -0400 10/23/06, Joseph S D Yao wrote: > > >I've noticed of late less understanding of DNS in the people charged > >with maintaining it out there. Sad. > > Sad? I don't thi

Re: Collocation Access

On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 05:51:17AM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > > In recent memory, I can think of two large collocation > > centers that retain your ID. One is in Miami and one in New York (I don't > > think I need to name names, most of you know to which I refer). > > All others > > (includin

Re: Need help explaining in-addr.arpa to Limelight

On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 09:13:03PM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote: > > At 18:48 -0400 10/23/06, Joseph S D Yao wrote: > > >No, because in fact you can. There is nothing magic about an > >in-addr.arpa domain. > > I'd say there is some magic. Possibly. There are

Re: Need help explaining in-addr.arpa to Limelight

On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 06:03:22PM -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > Hi, > > I seem to be having a problem. Limelight has SWIP'd > 69.28.185.0/24 to me, and I asked for IN-ADDR.ARPA control. > I recently went to check and it seemed not to be working > right. I sent them an email around

Re: Collocation Access

On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 03:06:57PM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > > I once was going to a meeting at a colo in Tysons Corner, which will > remain nameless (but you would know it). > > Like most of them, it wasn't well marked, and we couldn't find it. > Three of us wound up walking through

Re: Broadband ISPs taxed for "generating light energy"

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:36:03AM -0700, Gregory Hicks wrote: ... > My wife (Korean) tole me yesterday that the past weekend was "Chusok" > (or Korean 'Thanksgiving' - Actually, the Harvest Festival)... So > maybe India has something similar...? ... But why would the Harvest Festival be the Tr

Re: Broadband ISPs taxed for "generating light energy"

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:16:05PM -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: ... > It's 10/10, which if viewed as the binary number 1010 is 10 base 10. > Surely that has to mean something! (Well, I just made it up, but it > sounds goodd) ... Steve, think about it. For all base N, N > 1, 10 base 10

Re: Broadband ISPs taxed for "generating light energy"

On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:36:41AM -0400, Joe Loiacono wrote: > Notice the date: October 10. That is the Indian equivalent of our April 1. Ah. Culture clash. Therefore the story can be relegated to the same coop as the IP-carrying pigeons. The sole justification for asking this is to help us

Re: [Fwd: Important ICANN Notice Regarding Your Domain Name(s)]

On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 05:06:16PM -0700, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: ... > This reason is almost guaranteed. I'd been watching this thread with > some mild curiosity, since I have never received such a notification, > for any domain. All my data is accurate (nothing is hidden, everything > is there).

Re: AOL Non-Lameness

On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 11:53:56PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: ... > Drew the attention of a friend at AOL to this and got a reply quoted > below - this was apparently an issue at AOL's end. Thanks to AOL for > quickly acting to fix this. > > I've been asked by my friend to post this bel

Re: Zimbabwe satellite Internet link restored

On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:24:30AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 09:58:42AM +0100, Alexander Harrowell wrote: > > > > I'm a little surprised they came back up. I can certainly see the > > benefit for the regime to have - unavoidably, no money! - no Internet > > for the pu

Re: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf]

On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:22:34AM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: ... > Who thinks it would be a "good idea" to have a knob such that ICMP > error messages are always source from a certain IP address on a router? ... I've sometimes thought it would be useful when I wanted to hide a route. Bu

Re: fyi-- [dns-operations] early key rollover for dlv.isc.org

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:39:51PM +, Fergie wrote: > Hmmm. It wouldn't have anything to do with prime numbers, now would > it? :-) Well, yes, but there are an infinite number of them. Of course, 17 is the most prime of them all. -- Joe Yao ---

Re: fyi-- [dns-operations] early key rollover for dlv.isc.org

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:37:40PM -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > On 21 Sep 2006 17:01:45 +, Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Paul, what exponent does the new key use? (I clicked on the public key > > > link, but I can't decode the base64 that easily...) > > > > it was made wi

Re: Removal of my name

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 09:38:15AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > at least a rather updated version of ucb mail, that also does imap / > pop / ssl / smtp + auth etc > > "heirloom mailx" aka "nail" - http://nail.sourceforge.net Try: . Moved

Re: Removal of my brain

On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 05:04:53PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:23:46 EDT, Todd Vierling said: > > > Which is just one of the reasons that the MIME type > > "multipart/alternative" exists. Sane MUAs that wish to send HTML also > > send a text/plain alternative segment

Re: Removal of my name

On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 02:59:47PM -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote: > An e-mail message *can* in fact, be HTML, as HTML is a text payload > like any other. Yes, and for those, one may use: /etc/mailcap:text/html; lynx %s; print=lynx -dump %s | lp But for some reason, that particular message fa

Re: Removal of my name

On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:14:27AM -0700, Bill Woodcock wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > something in HTML that i can not parse... > > care to repost in a format that is readable? > > Bill, it's really time for you to upgrade from UCB Mail

Cogent problems in the uk.

. Thanks Joseph

Re: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback?

On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 12:18:59PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote: ... > Even if you assume that allocations made by ARIN are not property, it's > hard to argue that pre-ARIN allocations are not. They're not subject to > revocation and their grant wasn't conditioned on compliance with policies.

RE: Spain was offline

I wish the article had more info since I have been wondering how a software upgrade downed the entire zone. Wasn't there any backup servers? Did they not test the upgrade before hand? I know I'd lose my job if I upgraded our dns servers all at once with out testing. > -Original Message--

Re: Wherefore art thou Qwest

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:51:34AM -0400, J. Oquendo wrote: > > Can someone from Qwest shoot me an email. I have a PSTN carrier routing > VoIP now and they're telling me your routing tables became corrupt or > something. Calls have been "a" dropping. > > ===

RE: Amazon?

That whois stuff is meaningless. When are people going to get it that it really isn't a "hack". > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jon R. Kibler > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 1:36 PM > To: Elijah Savage > Cc: Brandon Galbraith; [

Re: New Laptop Polices

On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 09:31:52PM -0500, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote: > > Joseph S D Yao wrote: > > >Do modern laptops have disk drives that are that hard to remove? > > Let us say "No, they are not that hard to remove." > > Now what? (Recall that

Re: New Laptop Polices

On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 02:28:33AM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote: > On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Joseph S D Yao wrote: > > > Do modern laptops have disk drives that are that hard to remove? > > one screw and 'pop' out comes all dell laptop harddrives... or boot from >

Re: New Laptop Polices

Do modern laptops have disk drives that are that hard to remove? -- Joe Yao --- This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.

Re: mitigating botnet C&Cs has become useless

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 08:25:40AM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote: ... > Let me try to become Gadi. First of all block port 80 (http) :) > Next block port 53 udp (dns). > > Now you have got rid of amplification attacks because spoofing does > no longer work and you have got rid of all those silly use

RE: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal

> Behalf Of Florian Weimer > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 6:58 AM > To: Mark Newton > Cc: Seth Johnson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Net Neutrality Legislative Proposal > > > * Mark Newton: > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 09:39:50AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > > > * Mark Newton: >

RE: Sitefinder II, the sequel...

I agree. I think this isn't a bad service. If people want to run it more power to them. > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Golding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 12:22 PM > To: 'Stephane Bortzmeyer'; 'Steve Sobol' &

Re: Sitefinder II, the sequel...

Title: Re: Sitefinder II, the sequel... If its their corp IT peopl.  Oh well they should get over it.  If isp vote with your dollars.  -Original Message- From:   Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:   Tue Jul 11 00:09:25 2006 To: Steve Sobol Cc: Joseph

RE: Sitefinder II, the sequel...

Title: RE: Sitefinder II, the sequel... Nice troll.  -Original Message- From:   Gerry Boudreaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:   Mon Jul 10 06:45:33 2006 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:    Sitefinder II, the sequel... It is not VeriSign this time. For those who have not y

Re: CFP: DA Workshop - ISOI

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 09:37:02AM -0500, Gadi Evron wrote: > > This is a call for papers for a DA Workshop (ISOTF/TISF DA). Its name is: > Internet Security Operations and Intelligence Workshop or ISOI for short. > > DA stands for Drone Armies (botnets), which is the main subject of this > work

Re: NANOG Spam?

On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:32:11PM +0200, Sabri Berisha wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 05:20:04PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > Hi, > > > Finally, we crawled the archives of the big lists and have come > > up with a list of subscribers who haven't posted in over 9 months, we > > plan to

RE: DNS Based Load Balancers

Title: RE: DNS Based Load Balancers What would be a better solution then?  -Original Message- From:   Lincoln Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:   Tue Jul 04 18:30:00 2006 To: 'Rodrick Brown'; 'Sam Stickland' Cc: 'Matt Ghali'; 'Patrick W. Gilmore'; nanog@merit.edu Subject:

Re: DNS Based Load Balancers

F5 BigIP appears quite good. If you add their 3DNS software, you get wide-IP's as well. -- Joe Yao --- This message is not an official statement of OSIS Center policies.

OT!!! Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday

On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 03:21:23PM -0700, Gregory Hicks wrote: > > From: Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:16:50 -0700 > > To: Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: nanog@merit.edu > > Subject: Re: wrt joao damas' DLV talk on wednesday > > > > > therefore registrars (

  1   2   3   >