On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:05:03AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Reading nanog-reform? Is there some kind of list? Let me have
> a look at http://www.nanog-reform.org. Nope, nothing here but
> old news.
The nanog-reform list was announced both on nanog@ and
during the Sunday night mee
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:53:59AM -0600, Adi Linden wrote:
> How is this any different then blocking port 25 or managing the bandwidth
> certain applications use.
If the article is correct, and the ISP involved is also a LEC, then
it would be pretty clearly anticompetitive, and the LECs
When you check in for NANOG33, there will be colored stickers
available for your name tag that indicate if you have an interest in
signing PGP keys. If people keep trying to peer with you, you've picked
the wrong color sticker and should go back.
We are meeting at 9:00pm on Mon
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 03:15:47PM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
> Hadn't it gotten to the point shortly before Cidera folded that the
> satellite bandwidth was so insufficient for a "full feed" that it was of
> questionable value?...or was it still fine if you wanted a usenet feed
> with no binaries?
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 11:25:05AM -0500, Matt Levine wrote:
> All attemps to reach them are have failed.
Am I the only person that finds this ironic?
# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2004-09-16 19:10
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.
OrgName:Prof
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:33:21PM -0700, Gregory Hicks wrote:
> Actually...
>
> The "collision" problem discovered means that there might be MULTIPLE 680MB
> files that give the same checksum.
>
> Of course, the utility of most of these files would be an exercise left to
> the 'cracker' i
