His subject says New York.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Justin M. Streiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?
On Wed, 16
I believe its everything.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Jason Frisvold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jared Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Nikos Mouat [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 1:03 PM
I recommend Kris Twomey... lokt.net
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: ISP CALEA compliance
Nikos Mouat
Join the wireless list at wispa.org and the wisp list at part-15.org
They've been discussing it quite a bit. There's also a FAQ at wispa.org
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Nikos Mouat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog
I believe if you have any equipment in the process at all, you're to be
CALEA compliant.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Sean Donelan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 2:23 PM
I'd look at Mikrotik. There's a listserv at part-15.org and a web forum at
mikrotik.com
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 3:58 PM
Myth Busters proved that turning the lights off is more cost efficient than
leaving them on.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Robert Bonomi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 11
I tried filling out a supplier form on Cingular's web site, but it bounced
because of a bad email. Unfortunately, postmaster and webmaster also bounce.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Almost ALL providers should be multihomed.
--Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
virendra rode //
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:26 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former Telcove property)
-BEGIN PGP
, Mike Hammett wrote:
Almost ALL providers should be multihomed.
--Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
virendra rode //
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:26 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: SaidCom disconnected by Level 3 (former
http://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four222
4.2.2 is the allocation to ISPs section; therefore 4.2.2.2 would be a part
of that. It states under that multihomed section that if you can
demonstrate efficient usage of a /23, you can receive a /22 from ARIN.
--Mike
_
From:
Free WIFI is just a joke anyway. Most of the time when someone is referring
to wanting or providing free WIFI, they don't really know what they're
talking about. People like free and people dislike being tethered, thus all
of the buzz around free WIFI.
--Mike
-Original Message-
From:
I'd say the reason cable is more popular is because most DSL is ran by the
incumbent telcos and you can't get good anything from those guys. DSL is a
better technology, but the companies doing it suck.
--Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
WiMAX is minimally different than most current wireless broadband equipment.
Its main selling point is higher scale, thus lower cost. Its improved RF
capabilities result in maybe 10 db.
--Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alexander
Lower frequencies such as TV whitespace and 700 MHz will greatly help the
WISP of today serve areas where current wireless technologies cannot due to
frequency. WiMAX will have very little coverage advantage over current
wireless technologies.
--Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Current wireless technologies have no problem with the rural aspect, just
the hills and foliage. Get on a tall enough tower in a remote enough area,
you can have quite a range on your wireless coverage. I'm not sure of the
cost of a cell tower setup, but the cost outfitting a tower for WISP use
Fixed wireless or cell wireless? I wouldn't touch cell, but most every
conference I've been to (granted they are WISP conferences) has had a fixed
wireless backhaul.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brandon Galbraith
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007
Does anyone else notice any issues?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mhammett]# tcptraceroute 63.175.151.3 5060
Selected device eth0, address 205.218.65.34, port 51739 for outgoing packets
Tracing the path to 63.175.151.3 on TCP port 5060, 30 hops max
1 205.138.198.193 2.686 ms 0.404 ms 1.042 ms
2
Can anyone confirm if AboveNet and Level(3) have
added or improved peering in Chicago? I don't have a previous traceroute
to compare to, but a new one from my ISP network singlehomed on AboveNet to a
server with several carriers including Level(3) seems to suggest that.
Traceroutes always
19 matches
Mail list logo
