ls of what you're trying to
accomplish, I might be able to make some more specific suggestions.
Miles Fidelman
**
The Center for Civic Networking PO Box 600618
Miles R. Fidelman, President &
Just out of curiousity, I wonder how many domain registrations those of us
on nanog represent? Contract sanctions from ICANN are one thing, taking
all of our business elsewhere might also be effective at getting a point
across (though it might also backfire - pushing Verisign to be even more
agre
da, who
was also calling from his cell phone on his day off. This was part of a
6-month, ongoing problem that turned out to result from a memory leak in
the nearest poletop box serving my home - it turns out that this specific
box hadn't received the upgrade that fixed a problem that the industry
knew about for a year.
Sigh...
Miles Fidelman
Somebody pointed out, on another list, that Verisign's move is essentially
a "man in the middle" attack. Which leads to the question: are they in
violation of any Federal laws - such as, say, the Patriot Act?
Despite some news reports, Boston does not seem to be effected by the
blackout, nor is MA in general.
As I recall, there was some talk earlier this year about connecting the
MA grid to the NY area grid - but that talk got stalled. I think people
were worried about insufficient connectivity and r
lot of people on this list might have that sort of
quantitative data - so... any comments?
Regards,
Miles Fidelman
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 09:15:08 -0400
From: Timothy Denton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Telecom Regulation & the Internet
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Scott Weeks wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Adam Kujawski wrote:
> :
> : I'm going to launch a couple DAT tapes across the parking lot with a spud gun
> : and see if I can achieve 923 Mb/s!
>
> Yer gonna need a big damn spud gun... :-)
>
> Contest Rules
>
> 1.A minimum
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > This is exactly why ISP's should not be allowed to have these "we will
> > disconnect you at our sole discretion" clauses.
>
> You can't forbid them. Private enterprises have (and should have) every
> right to manage their own business as they want. Ju
somebody wrote:
> > So who's up for adding the military in to spews:).
I'm, sure some of the folks who dislike spews would appreciate the
military's likely response to such an action. :-)
On 10 Dec 2002, Nigel Titley wrote:
> > 2) Does anyone else see a HUGE problem with listing a /19 because there is
> > one /32 of a spam advertised website? When did this start happening?
>
> Since SPEWS, with its complete lack of accountability, started being
> used by respectable spam blocking
much,
Miles Fidelman
**
The Center for Civic Networking PO Box 600618
Miles R. Fidelman, President & Newtonville, MA 02460-0006
Director, Municipal Telecommunications
Strategie
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Nigel Clarke wrote:
> Start now, do whatever it takes.
>
> Amongst the paperwork passed to congress, RIAA must have indicated where
> it's hackers would work from. Why not start there?
What they plan to do sounds incredibly illegal. Now if we could arrange
for their top man
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, JC Dill wrote:
> >rigorous fight against the RIAA since they would mostly be defending
> >the rights of people and organizations that they don't do business
>
> If one voluntarily caves in, they will almost certainly see their sales
> plummet. Would you buy bandwidth from
13 matches
Mail list logo
