Anyone at Comcast , ?'s . Offline please .

2006-03-30 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Someone Helpful , I have been unable to acquire the attention of someone at comcast (cable) that will help me get my network back into the table . If anyone knows a clueful & willing contact within comcast please respond . Tia , JimL ps:

Re: OT - Vint Cerf joins Google

2005-09-09 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello William , On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, william(at)elan.net wrote: On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Daniel Golding wrote: Getting back on-topic - how can this be? I thought only service providers (with downstream customers) could get PI v6 space. Isn't this what policy proposal 2005-1 is about? Can so

Re: None of the RIRs claims 156.228.80.144

2004-10-14 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
San Francisco, CA 94102 UNITED STATES (415) 241-6169 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 11:42:42AM -0600, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: Hello All , Where can I find info about this range/ip & who has routing respnsibility for it ? I have searched

Re: None of the RIRs claims 156.228.80.144

2004-10-14 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Bill , Which tool or RIR did you dig that out of ? Tia , JimL On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: san francisco unified school district :: Steve Huey San Francisco Unified School District 135 Van Ness Avenue #300 San Francisco, CA 94102 UNITED

None of the RIRs claims 156.228.80.144

2004-10-14 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello All , Where can I find info about this range/ip & who has routing respnsibility for it ? I have searched -all- RIR's & all say they don't have any information on it at any levels . Tia , JimL APNIC reports this which is a little bit more info , But ...

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello All , On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Kelly Setzer wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:07:31AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: ...snip... > > Is there an effective alternative? All the intel "servers" these days > > seem to have one of those handy

Cisco Secure ACS Solution Engine-a 1-RU

2004-02-13 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello All , Is anyone using this product in in production ? I have a customer who is in a crunch for time & is unable to put any sugnificant resources together to build one from scratch . Please reply off list & I'll summarize . Tia , JimL -- +---

Re: updated root hints file

2004-01-29 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello All , Hmmm , watching this thread & having acquired the new cache ile I did a diff on it & noticed that 'J' was changed as well (compared to MY cache file) . Did 'J' change sometime in the near past that I missed ? Tia , JimL ie: -B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.

Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards)

2003-09-23 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
nd 9.1 only support "delegation-only" zones. > to get the "root-delegation-only" option you need 9.2.3rc3. > see www.isc.org/products/BIND/delegation-only.html for details. > re: > > Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 14:22:57 -0400 (EDT) > > From: "Mr. James W. L

Re: bind patches++ (Re: Wildcards)

2003-09-20 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Paul , Am I correct in the understanding that the below tells me that 9.2.2p2 does NOT contain the ablility to do root-delegation-only ? Tia , JimL On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Paul Vixie wrote: > if you installed the first isc wildcard patch you probably want the second.

Re: Nothing like viruses with bugs in them (Swen)

2003-09-19 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello All , On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Brian Bruns wrote: > These are exim filters which catch the damn thing when the antivirus > software misses it. Hopefully it might be useful. It was taken from > http://pkierski.republika.pl/filtry.shtml. ...snipped nice exim filters... Is there

Re: News of ISC Developing BIND Patch

2003-09-18 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Whoever , On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > MAC addresses are not without authority delegation. The IEEE is the ultimate > > > authority in said case. > > > Any solution which requires uniqueness also requires a singu

Re: Worst design decisions?

2003-09-18 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello All , On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Gerald wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Actually, as awkward as those rubber hoods are, what I like about them is > > that when you're pulling a disconnected patch cable through a rat's nest > > of wires, they prevent the plastic t

Re: Hijacked email

2003-08-20 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello All , I have just seen several bounces from various places with my addy being used as well . JimL On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Nathan A. Stratton wrote: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Anyone seeing hijacked email addresses with this Sobig-F worm? I did > > some

Re: Did Sean Gorman's maps show the cascading vulnerability in Ohio?

2003-08-18 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Scott , On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Scott McGrath wrote: > A measured response is needed. Obviosly we do not want the > vulnerabilities disclosed to bored teenagers looking for "excitement". > We need controlled access to this data so that those of us who need the > data to fix vulnerabil

Re: New danger to cabling - Can your datacenter prevent this?

2003-07-07 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello All , The attack of the Cotton tailed Rat !-) . On Mon, 7 Jul 2003, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > http://colofinder.net/gallery/view_album.php?set_albumName=cable-eater > A bit of humor on a boring monday afternoon. Next week, we're turning this rabbit > loose under the floor at 25 Broadw

Re: Ettiquette and rules regarding Hijacked ASN's or IP space?

2003-06-10 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Kia , In line On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Kai Schlichting wrote: > On 6/9/2003 at 4:06 PM, "Christopher L. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sure, you are announcing 196.1.1.0/24 and only that, fine, but are you > > allowed to announce that prefix? Are you "Centre for Monitoring India

Re: dnsbl's? - an informal survey

2003-05-31 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Jack , On Fri, 30 May 2003, Jack Bates wrote: > Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: > > > White listing is NOT what was being discussed . Tho is can be > > adventagous in the right circumstances . > > > And neither was Static addressing . Fi

Re: dnsbl's? - an informal survey

2003-05-31 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Jack , On Fri, 30 May 2003, Jack Bates wrote: > Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: > > Hello Charles & All , Love all of you that want to filter , > > Please do I would bo one of those that you'd filter . I've been > > running my lit

Re: dnsbl's? - an informal survey

2003-05-31 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Charles & All , Love all of you that want to filter , Please do I would bo one of those that you'd filter . I've been running my little home netowrk for ~8 years using dialup , isdn , adsl , cable . Never could get any employer to fork over better

Luminous Product ?'s (was: Re: Looking for a piece of gear to do)

2002-11-22 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello All , Someone has been trying to foist off on a friend of mine a box from Scientific-Atlanta called a Luminous ? That is supposed to do the something simular . Anyone have any insights on this product line ? There is also some card/add-on device that

Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?

2002-05-04 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello J.A. Terranson , On Sat, 4 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, 4 May 2002, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: > > Theft/Taxes nearly the same . ;-) JimL > Really? What's the difference? I was giving the thief the benefit of

Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?

2002-05-04 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello Randy , On Sat, 4 May 2002, Randy Bush wrote: > > a cost that you are forced to pay in order to enrich somebody else is > > theft > i thought it was called 'taxes' :-)/2 Theft/Taxes nearly the same . ;-) JimL +---

Re: Sheilded Cat-5E Ground Loop - Myth or Reality?

2002-04-10 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, David Schwartz wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:17:01 -0400 (EDT), David Lesher wrote: > >If you use that sand-based media instead of the copper; > >you'll avoid LOTS of issues -- ground loops, induced noise, > >corrosion resistance, etc... > >Fiber Is Your Friend. > Yo