On Jan 22, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Jim Shankland wrote:
"Travis H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IIRC, someone representing the electrical companies approached
someone representing network providers, possibly the IETF, to
ask about the feasibility of using IP to monitor the electrical
meters thro
On 8/10/06, Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
on Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:55:37PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> There's at least one vietnamese ISP that has / had till recently set
> "localhost" as rDNS for all their IPs.
IIRC, that was fpt.vn; they replaced 'localhost' with t
Alex Rubenstein wrote:
Huh?
A Watt has no time constant. A watt is an amount of energy consumed at
a moment (ie, a 60 watt light bulb), not an amount of energy over time
(like a watt-hour; for instance, a 60 watt light bulb uses 60
watt-hours of power every hour, or 1.44 kwatt-hrs per day).
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 10:51:27AM -0500, Church, Chuck wrote:
> Since the intended (and announced) use of this server is just for DIX
> networks, blocking NTP from any other networks should be trivial. That
> IP address will still be hit by D-Link devices looking for a suitable
> server, but wi
+<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 06:49:18PM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>
> Its just NTP, I can't imagine that it is *really* enoug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Limit recursion to trusted netblocks and customers. Do not permit
your name servers to provide recursion for the world. If you do,
you will contribute to one of these attacks.
I don't really think that preventing every Tom, Dick, and Harry from
usi
Martin Hannigan wrote:
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Martin Hannigan wrote:
74.63.0.0/20
75.127.0.0/20
76.191.0.0/20
...should be withdrawn now.
Why?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ping 74.63.1.2
PING 74.63.1.2 (74.63.1.2): 56 data byes
--- 74.63.1.2 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 0 packets rec
Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 10:45:33PM -0400, Todd Vierling wrote:
Maybe to start -- but again, what kind of 6to4 traffic level are we
expecting yet?
Peak or average? Think twice before answering. :-)
I'm told there are 6to4 relays seeing in excess of 100mbps. Not b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somehow, I don't think anything that Abilene does is going to fix Jordi's
routing. From where *you* are, do *you* have a path to
2001:0440:1880:1000::0020
that *doesn't go through Japan? If so, what does your path look like?
At least some parts of the US seem to.
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
i also remain convinced that using anycast to do distributed load
balancing for applications like WWW, ... is silly, and will more often
do harm or do nothing than do good. (and i've told akamai and speedera
this many times.)
The fact your digs returned different
Dean Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Paul G wrote:
i'm terribly sorry, but i'm unable to extract any meaning at all from these
statements. when i parse them, they make no sense at all (not in terms of
being wrong, just not understandable). could you rephrase them?
coherency and consistency are
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 4/30/05, Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ANantes-106-1-5-107.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr
You'll see 'abo' for 'cable', perhaps? as well as 'cable'. But for most
abo = short for "abonnement", that is, "subscription" / "subscriber"
Just means its a pool of IP
> I'm with Paul on the "makes sense" to run your own personal mail server
> - for me, and others who _can_ run their own mail server. For those
> who can't, public mail servers are all "scary". Gmail is no more scary
> than hotmail, yahoo, msn, verizon, earthlink, or any of a billion other
> m
13 matches
Mail list logo
