On Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:00 PM, Jared B. Reimer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Another independent ISP operator and I have noticed a pretty significant
> increase in traffic to and from our broadband (DSL) subscribers since
> August. It's been a fairly steady uptick, at leas
On Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:48 PM, Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How should your peers certify that the routes you announce are
>> reasonable for them to receive?
>
> completely orthogonal issue.
>
> but, if you have interest in the topic, you might look into sbgp.
>
sBGP does d
DE-CIX (http://www.de-cix.net) does (see 4.4
http://www.de-cix.net/info/DE-CIX_technical_requirements.pdf). And afaik
that's also true for LINX, AMS-IX, Xchangepoint, ... Look at their policies
as well.
DE-CIX does not monitor this. However if you are using DE-CIX's routeserver
your announcements
6500-NEBS has also vertical boards ...
Arnold
On Monday, October 13, 2003 10:37 PM, Robert A. Hayden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 7600 is also vertical boards whereas the 6500 is horizontal.
>
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Simon Lockhart wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon Oct 13, 2003 at 01:19:21PM -0700, Tom (Uni
On Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:18 PM, Matthew Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Shouldn't customers that purchase IP services from an ISP use the ISPs
> mail server as a smart host for outbound mail?
At least here in DE there are resellers of DTAG which offer DSL connections
without any SMTP
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 9:00 AM, Peter Galbavy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Roy wrote:
>> This article seems to imply that North American networks don't care
>> about IP V6 while the rest of the world is suffering great hardship
>>
>> http://www.msnbc.com/news/945119.asp
>>
>> PS. Please don'
Hola Gabriel,
reading http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0302/merger.html might be very helpful.
Regards, Arnold
On Monday, July 14, 2003 3:47 AM, Adonaylo, Gabriel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> First of all, forgive my English writting please!
>
> I work for an Internet Carrier in Argent
On Tuesday, June 03, 2003 8:12 AM, Mike Leber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a unified table of AS names or a tool that could be used
> to generate such a table.
>
> When a check of RIPE shows:
>
> # whois AS3320 -h whois.ripe.net
> % This is the RIPE Whois server.
> % The objects ar
me 2. About 16 messages starting 2002/10/04 to 2002/11/07.
Arnold
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 1:28 PM
Subject: What? : Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (fwd)
>
> anyone
Did you already check http://www.euro-ix.net/isp/choosing/search/form.php. This DB
lists all ASN connected to any Euro-IX member (currently 23).
Regards, Arnold
- Original Message -
From: "Petri Helenius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 8:
Gawie,
what do you mean by "... onto the Internet"? If you just want to enable each site with
Internet go for http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/mem-services/general/indices/DE.html and
pick one (or more) of the ISPs offering services in Germany. Otherwise pls explain in
more detail.
Regards, Arnol
Expansion of nothing is still nothing. Others call it ...
Arnold
>
> That is very short summary, would you care to expand a little bit?
>
> Pete
>
> >
> > Hello,
> > First of all, thanks for all the answers that I received from the list.
> > Some of you asked me a feedback on the answers r
Stephen J. Wilcox:
> > It's very interesting to see the traffic stats at
> > http://www.ams-ix.net/hugegraph.html Usually, incoming and outgoing
> > traffic is the same. But during this problem, much more traffic went out
> > than came in.
>
> Curious, as the exchange sources no traffic that sho
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
> There seem to be large scale problems at the AMS-IX. BGP sessions with
> peers keep oscillating. Since their own addresses keep jumping all over
> the place, it is not possible to reach anyone over the AMS-IX tech list.
>
> I have disabled all AMS-IX peerings for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> > According to definition, is should take the same path, but are there any
> > other cases that I should be aware of?
>
> According to the definition, it is going to show you the path the packets
> took from you to the destination, not from the destination back.
RRDTool is *very* flexible when it comes to displaying anything. Usually it does
autosizing. Try
something lile
rrdtool graph $output --units-exponent 9 ...
If this doesn't help try [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards, Arnold
>
> I have been trying to search for a way to monitor customers bandwidth
Lane Patterson wrote:
> Of course what I really want for Xmas is a Force10 box ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> -Lane
>
For sure! But how likely is it that they don't take the same road as Pluris
did? Or to rephrase it: technically it sounds very sound, but does this hold
also commercial wise?
Regards, Arno
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> > So, to restate the problem, how do we identify some of the sources of a
> > DoS attack quickly, maybe even while the attack is still in progress?
>
> Not a complete solution but a start:
> IP Source Tracker:
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/io
>From their website: "If no agreement can be reached, the network will be
shut down in a controlled and orderly manner, starting on Friday, 19-07-2002
at 11:00 European time"
see http://www.kpnqwest.com for details.
Arnold
--
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone/mob:
As a lot of people are offering secondary services: may be it's a good idea
to place infrastructural services at IXP. IXP seem to be more stable than
any ISPs and often more neutral than ISPs.
Comments?
Arnold
--
Arnold Nipper, DE-CIX, the German Internet Exchange
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mobi
20 matches
Mail list logo
