- Original Message -
From: "Farrell,Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Randy Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "David Hubbard"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sam Stickland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: Problems connectivity GE on Foundry B
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Dambier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeroen Massar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tony Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Daniel Roesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Christoper L. Morrow"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, Octo
- Original Message -
From: "J. Oquendo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 10:23 AM
Subject: IOS exploit
>
>
> "Supposedly"/"Allegedly"/"Theoretically", rumor mill has it that a worm
> exploit of sorts has been published. My Russian is so so, n
- Original Message -
From: "tony sarendal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2005 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: image stream routers
--- snip ---
>>It sounds to me like a software based machine can
>> be plenty fast with good code under the hood.
>In my experience a data
- Original Message -
From: "Marshall Eubanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Matt Bazan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: Calling all NANOG'ers - idea for national hardware price quote
registry
>
> Am I the
- Original Message -
From: "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: OT - Vint Cerf joins Google
> The last figure that I remember, very impressive, was in April 2004, when
> the estimated number of hosts us
- Original Message -
From: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: Phone networks struggle in Hurricane Katrina's wake
>
> I'll file that comment where it belongs -- in file 13.
>
> If a major catastr
- Original Message -
From: "David Hubbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 5:50 PM
Subject: OT? Device to limit simultaneous connections per host?
> Hello everyone, I'm curious if anyone knows of a
> device that can throttle or limit a remote
> host's simulta
- Original Message -
From: "william(at)elan.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim McBurnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 2:55 PM
Subject: RE: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact List)
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Jim McBurnett wrote:
>
> > I'm sure that this made it
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd)
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Paul G wrote:
>
> > > The
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark Boolootian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:33 PM
Subject: Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd)
>
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Mark Boolootian wrote:
>
> >
> > > Note the nonsense about anycast
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gadi Evron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: On the-record - another "off-topic" post
>
> > Where are our brand new and shiny moderators?
>
> why? what damage is dean actually doi
folks,
if anyone at apple's noc (or someone who knows a way to get in touch w them)
is listening, please get back to me (off-list of course). you're sourcing a
few hundred kpps of dos traffic. i'd rather not be receiving it and i assume
you'd rather not have an owned box (or are you celebrating
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Amundson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 1:45 PM
Subject: RE: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on
workstations
> Windows definitely caches DNS entries...but as far as I've seen, it does
> honor TTLs...
from wh
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Gauthier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors
> Hrm... Isn't a VoIP call realtively low bandwidth? I haven't studied
> this,
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Pozar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hannigan, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: "Bandwidth Advisors" - www.bandwidthadvisors.com
--- snip ---
> I know a bunch of consultants out there (me being one, Bill Wo
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Pozar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 6:57 PM
Subject: "Bandwidth Advisors" - www.bandwidthadvisors.com
>
> Just got a call from "Tosten" of a company called "Bandwidth
> Advisors". They represent themselves as a "Independent Te
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Gibbard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill
--- snip ---
> Regardless of the legal and
> technical merits of the plan, requiring a watered down web doesn't seem
> inconsistent.
- Original Message -
From: "Kathryn Kessey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill
> They are going to create publicly accessible, highly available database
service of the all the world's > porn sites and maintain i
- Original Message -
From: "Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill
>
> CNET's extract is wrong.
>
> The article states
>
> The measure, SB 260, says: "Upon requ
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Weeks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: Utah governor signs Net-porn bill
>
>
>
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
>
> :
> : "Utah's governor signed a bill on Monday that would
> : require I
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Bonomi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: sorbs.net
> The original poster has already noted a contact has been made, and I
> will watch it with interest - and the pos
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Kulawiec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: sorbs.net
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:21:35AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> > o could this be used as a dos and then become extortion?
>
> Unlikely. Blocklists are
- Original Message -
From: "Gadi Evron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hannigan, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Micah McNelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: sorbs.net
>
> >>From http://www.us.sorbs.net/faq/spamdb.shtml
> >
> > "Third and finally,
- Original Message -
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:17 AM
Subject: RE: High volume WHOIS queries
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "joe mcguckin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dan Lockwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "NANOG"
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 4:53 AM
Subject: Re: High volume WHOIS queries
>
> altho arguably its not up to arin to provide proce
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Colin Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: Symantec AV may execute viruses
>
> Also, it doesn't appear that this issue effects the Mac software (at
> least, I didn't s
- Original Message -
From: "Alexei Roudnev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruce Tonkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 3:45 AM
Subject: Re: Gtld transfer process
>
> Problem - you are talking about changing registrar, but in reality you
> describe changing of domain o
- Original Message -
From: "Steven J. Sobol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jim Shankland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Adrian Chadd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: The entire mechanism is Wrong!
>
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Jim Shankland wrote:
>
> > Of co
- Original Message -
From: "William Allen Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "North American Network Operators Group"
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 4:33 PM
Subject: panix hijack press
>
> Nothing like staying on the subject That's way I started a new
> thread. Let's keep this sep
- Original Message -
From: "Alexei Roudnev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "William Allen Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: panix.com hijacked (VeriSign refuses to help)
>
> I addition, there is a good rule for such situations:
> - first, retur
- Original Message -
From: "Thor Lancelot Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 2:40 AM
Subject: Re: panix.com hijacked (VeriSign refuses to help)
--- snip ---
> I don't know if these ar
- Original Message -
From: "Thor Lancelot Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 2:04 AM
Subject: Re: panix.com hijacked (VeriSign refuses to help)
>
> Alexis Rosen tried to send this to NANOG earlier this evening but it
> looks like it never made it. Apologies
- Original Message -
From: "cw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: Sanity worm defaces websites using php bug
> Gonna be a nightmare for server ops to ensure that all client copies
> of phpBB are patched..
it is as simple
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Trebilco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: verizon.net and other email grief
> How so? Are you maybe confusing reject with bounce? If address
> verification takes place while the SMTP connec
- Original Message -
From: "Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rich Kulawiec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:23 PM
Subject: RE: verizon.net and other email grief
>
>
> While I can't speak to what Verizon is using, Both Exim and Postfix have
the
>
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rich Kulawiec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Alex Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: zone transfers, a spammer's dream?]
>
>
>
> --On 09 December 2004
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick W Gilmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Patrick W Gilmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Banned on NANOG
>
> On Dec 3, 2004, at 8:41 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTE
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Haagsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: "Make love, not spam"
>
> I agree and I'm surpr
- Original Message -
From: "Miller, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 10:27 AM
Subject: RE: "Make love, not spam"
>Although I have
>traditionally been in favor of low bandwidth "fixes", this kind of
>appeals to my sense of poetic justi
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Donelan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 11:08 PM
Subject: More thefts from CO/colo in New York
>
> On Wednesday night burglars attempted to steal line cards from
> the co-location area of a central office in
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Donelan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:38 PM
Subject: RE: Goofle/Sprint having problems?
>
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Vandy Hamidi wrote:
> > Yeah, a visual route just showed my trace going to AUS and then
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Kulawiec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: EFF whitepaper
--- snip ---
> > Collateral damage is unacceptable, period.
>
> Oh, I most certainly agree -- but then again, since nobody is bei
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Vixie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Paul G") writes:
>
> &g
- Original Message -
From: "Jørgen Hovland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Jørgen Hovland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Network.Security" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Netw
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Haagsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 5:59 AM
Subject: RE: Cisco moves even more to china.
>
> On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 03:53, Joseph wrote:
> > Its time for all American Tec
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "J.A. Terranson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: SkyCache/Cidera replacement?
> Now...if there were napster for pr0n, then abpe would be unnecessary :)
ther
- Original Message -
From: "Neil J. McRae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Nicolas DEFFAYET'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Arnold
Nipper'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'Ken Gilmour'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 5:18 AM
Subject: RE: European Nanog?
>
> Too
folks,
looking to continue the week which has
been going strong so far with no mention of gmail, verisign and bad
analogies, i have these questions i'm hoping someone can chime in
on:
* any good/bad experiences with force10 gear in
general?
* thoughts on usage in a relatively simple
mul
- Original Message -
From: "joe mcguckin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NANOG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: On the back of other security posts (well some over a year ago
now)
>
>
> What strikes me as interesting is the fact that someone did hun
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: OT - 3 Free Gmail invites
>
> > You know, I'm having trouble finding people that *don't* have gmail.com
> >
- Original Message -
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>From: "Paul Jakma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 3:09 AM
Subject: Re: Quick question.
>
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Paul G wrote:
>
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Jakma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alexei Roudnev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Michel Py" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Nanog"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 2:39 AM
Subject: Re: Quick question.
--- snip ---
> Not really.. this is a resource exh
- Original Message -
From: "Wayne E. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: The use of .0/.255 addresses.
>
> I can tell you that at least with my customers, the term "cl
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ben Browning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Dr. Jeffrey Race" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: Attn MCI/UUNet - Massive abuse from your network
--- snipped -
- Original Message -
From: "Dr. Jeffrey Race" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert E. Seastrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Christopher L. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: Attn MCI/UUNet - Massive abuse from your network
>
> On
- Original Message -
From: "Dr. Jeffrey Race" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeffrey Race" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 11:20 PM
Subject: Re: Attn MCI/UUNet - Massive abuse from your network
>
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 03:05:41 + (GMT), Christoph
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 5:49 AM
Subject: Inside look at a spammer's business
>
> This site http://rejo.zenger.nl/abuse/1085493870.php has an interesting
> insider's account of running a spamming business and al
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Rescorla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Paul G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Eric Rescorla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > -- snip ---
> >
> &
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Rescorla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sean Donelan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Nanog'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: AV/FW Adoption Sudies
-- snip ---
> If we assume that the black hats aren't vas
- Original Message -
From: "Vinny Abello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mike Nice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: What HTTP exploit?
-- snip --
> I thought if it can be crashed by
> cramming too much info into a buffer before it'
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Haagsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: Problems with .de abuse
>
>
> > I sent the abuse email 2 days ago and got no response. After 2 more
days
> > of this, I
paul,
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Vixie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: who offers cheap (personal) 1U colo?
-- snip --
> $50/month at 40U rentable is $2000/rack/month if it's full. after paying
> for 60A of power a
erik,
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Haagsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Paul G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Deepak Jain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "william(at)elan.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"John Obi" <[EMAIL PROTECT
- Original Message -
From: "Deepak Jain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "william(at)elan.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "John Obi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 2:56 AM
Subject: Re: UUNet Offer New Protection Against DDoS
>
>
> william(at)elan.net wrot
- Original Message -
From: "william(at)elan.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Obi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 3:42 AM
Subject: Re: UUNet Offer New Protection Against DDoS
>
> On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, John Obi wrote:
> > Hello Nanogers!
> >
>
ken,
> ---snip---
> 3) There was a thread a little while ago that talked about a way to cut
> down spam by simply restricting who you would accept SMTP traffic from.
> Unfortunately, I don't recall the details, but at the time it struck me as
> eminently sensible, and just required cooperation be
- Original Message -
From: "Vivien M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'ken emery'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 8:28 PM
Subject: RE: More news coverage
> But isn't the "SiteFinder service" just VeriSign Marketing's name for the
> wildcard A record?
69 matches
Mail list logo
