To you it is just a bunch of spammer.
Other might had the wrong impression that really doesn't matter
what LACNIC is, and start to block the 200/8 because someone does so.
Just my thoughts,
Regards,
Ricardo.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 10:03:31AM -0800, just me wrote:
|
| On Fri, 12 Mar 200
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 10:59:01PM -0800, just me wrote:
|
| Behind all of LACNIC's 200/8 and Iskimaro, whoever the heck they are!
|
I'd say that it is not a wise thing to do, but it is up to you.
Inside this /8 block there are a lot allocation to important networks
in our region.
There is als
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 08:48:55AM -0800, bill wrote:
| > Hello,
| >
| > As many of you all might known, LACNIC has been allocated the block
| > 201/8 from IANA back in April/2003:
| >
| > http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
| ...
|
| > Based on this, we would like to ask to net
Hello,
As many of you all might known, LACNIC has been allocated the block
201/8 from IANA back in April/2003:
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
it was announced in this mailing list:
http://answerpointe.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/current/msg01094.html
But, some users are f
