On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Robert Hayden wrote:
> Another "me too" here. However, it appears that there is a hiccup with
> my account. According to the note, there's more than one CCO account
> associated with my email addy (which is strange since I only know of
> one)
Yes, that's what it said in my
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Dan Armstrong wrote:
> >
> > My PW to CCO did not work this morning either. I am on hold with the TAC
> > right now
>
> When I tried to access my CCO account this morning I got a page with
> instructions to email [EMAIL PR
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Joe Blanchard wrote:
> FYI
>
> I got an email that my CCO account's password was reset
> last night. Not sure how widespread this issue was, but
> I called my account contact and verified that this is
> a valid email, and that my password needed to be reset.
>
> Just a heads u
Two comments:
1. I enjoyed it
2. It must be nice to have that much free time on your hands
- SLS
Scott L. Stursa 850/644-2591
Network Security Analyst
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Stefan Baltus wrote:
> The catalyst 3350 is receiving the traffic from router to switch
> and vice versa.
Can we assume the 3550 port attached to the tap is GE?
> Now, we'd like to filter all but certain IP's on the
> 3350 and switch this traffic to a FE port on that same 3
Gaa. Beavers. Cute, but incredibly destructive. Don't get me started.
- SLS (who owns lakefront property)
Scott L. Stursa 850/644-2591
Network Security Officer
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> stuff under the floor:
> wildlife: common in TX, fireants/bees/arachnids in the vaults
Here in the SE USA we have a variety of cockroach we refer to as "palmetto
bugs". These grow to about 2 inches (5cm) in length. Any extended visit
under the floor
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Andy Dills wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Henry Linneweh wrote:
>
> >
> > Here are a list of very active ports that attempt to
> > hack into peoples systesm from various parts of the
> > world China in particular.
> >
> > I think unassigned ports should be dropped from
> > rou
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Tim Wilde wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, John Neiberger wrote:
>
> > Quick followup to my own post. I shouldn't have said that all .org
> > names won't resolve because that doesn't appear to be the case, but it
> > does appear that some are not resolving.
> >
> > Anyone know w
Two (possibly related?) phenomena:
1. Nothing from NANOG since yesterday.
2. .org TLD names not resolving
Maybe a local (to here) problem, but I thought I'd inquire before I start
looking into it.
Scott L. Stursa
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Mark Jeftovic [10/10/03 08:33 -0400]:
> >
> > I've received an email offlist that this problem should be back to
> > "pre-yesterday" conditions. It looks better on our end, as it should for
> > all else affected I would think.
>
> Our problem l
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Brian Bruns wrote:
> So, now for the fun part. Being offsite, I wasn't the one to place the
> calls, but my admin on site started with FSU's abuse desk. No help
> whatsoever. Claimed that because the abuse desk was gone, they had no
> authority to deal with the problem. Fr
12 matches
Mail list logo
