Bill,
With the right amount of prep work and understanding of how the
stacking works, you can control everything you complained about.
I complained about the same stuff until I read the document that
explains how to:
1) Renumber a switch in the cluster (and all of it's interfaces with
Can someone responsible for either security or operations of
www.cisco.com please contact me? We are seeing an issue where you may
be blocking one of our source IP addresses from accessing the website.
Thanks,
-Dave
David Temkin
S-I-G
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or
And let's not forget that if you use that 3rd party provider, especially
to connect to SIAC, you pay a premium to have someone to blame other
than the actual data provider.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Se
sorts of outages.
You are correct, however, it is one of the most reliable infrastructures
we connect to.
> -Original Message-
> From: R. Benjamin Kessler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 12:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Temkin, Davi
ally run into issues where they'd get certain larger firms
back able to trade sooner than smaller ones and then you create unfair
market disadvantages.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 10:40 AM
&
You can no longer order "direct" lines to SIAC unless you have an
extremely compelling reason. Nowadays you must order a line to "SFTI"
which is their Disaster-Recovery-centric service. You are correct about
the connection method, but he will need to be specific and understand
that he wants to c
Title: Message
With a
box like the Adtran Atlas you'd be able to give them the PRI's and hand the rest
off as a DS-3 or HSSI.
-Dave
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Drew
WeaverSent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:59 AMTo:
Kind of OT for NANOG, you should go to cisco-nsp for these kinds of
questions.
However, to answer your question anyway you need an IP plus version of IOS
to get 802.1q/ISL subifs on a 36xx router. That's only plain IP (c3620-i
vs. c3620-is)
-Original Message-
From: Roman Volf [mailto:[E
... And seeing as that all most switches are is a glorified multiple port
bridge, feel free to go to your 7500 and make it a switch by placing
"bridge-group 1" on every port, and if you want to get really crazy and make
it a L3 switch, go all out and put in a "bridge 1 route ip". :-)
-Origi
Title: Adjusting TCP windows on production systems?
Is there anyone in a production environment who, as part of their system build process, adjusts the TCP receive window/MSS/etc. on production systems?
I'm dealing with a few latency issues and the MSS settings improve them, but I'm hesitant
Title: Address for making BGP changes w/ Qwest?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't work anymore. Is there anyone from Qwest on the list or can someone point me to where I'm supposed to be making these changes now? (Call tech support?!)
Thanks,
Dave
Order it as an "alarm circuit"... At least that's how VZ recognizes it in
NY.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: Austad, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dry pair
Does anyone know to go about getting Qwest or a CLEC to pa
Not that Yipes is necessarily a transit provider by any means, but they have
done the same thing within the cores of their network. I was
troubleshooting an issue yesterday that was pointing to them for 15-20%
packet loss, and I called them and they stated that they started rate
limiting ICMP las
FWIW we've had FedEx destroy hundreds of thousands of dollars of gear in
transit (all shipped with full insurance and properly packed). They're
extremely slow to pay their insurance claims on large amounts, as well.
This has happened to us at least 5 times so far - cross-country,
cross-state, an
Title: 60 Hudson?
Does anyone know what the status of 60 Hudson in NYC is? We're waiting for Yipes to come back online and info has been hard to come by..
Thanks,
-Dave
David Temkin
S-I-G
True, but at that time you didn't have illegitimate traffic on port 80,
either. Future engineering could be worked around this issue.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Kaufman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:09 PM
To: 'McBurnett, Jim'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
Which, ironically coincided with the time WorldCom bought UUNet.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher L. Morrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 1:05 PM
To: Robert E. Seastrom
Cc: Eric Kuhnke; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: a new labor intensive layer 1 solution (h
According to Yipes it was just two customers affected - a landscaping truck
caught fire and took out a spur at Route 30 & Route 100...
-Original Message-
From: Nick Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 1:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fiber cut in PA?
Title: Latency generator?
Does anyone know of any free, cheap, or potentially rentable latency generators? Ideally I'd like something that just sits between two ethernet devices to induce layer 2/3 latency in traffic, but am open to any options...
David Temkin
S-I-G
401 City Avenue
Bala Cy
Back on topic...
For those who mentioned Verio I found
http://info.us.bb.verio.net/routing.html#PeerFilter which I forgot exists.
Looks like they've changed it to a /22 for everything in Class A and B
space.
IMPORTANT:The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is
confidentia
switch at some point, though.
Ironic, though, that you're 100% correct- that signature is going to be
archived publically, which goes against what it claims.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen J. Wilcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:51 PM
To: Temkin, David
g me these emails have gone
unanswered, which is why I am mentioning this here.
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:34 PM
To: Temkin, David
Subject: Re: Minimum prefix length?
you have sent a message to me which seems to conta
Title: Minimum prefix length?
A few years ago I had an issue with a few of the larger carriers rejecting my routes (from a natural Class B space) because their prefix length was too short (at one point I simply had the /16 divided into two /17's and this still got rejected in some places). I
I find ntop crashes quite often under heavy traffic loads, moreso if you're
using it realtime versus as a sflow/netflow collector, but even then it
still crashes.
Also, clicking too quickly on certain pages in ntop will crash the whole
thing :-)
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Brown [ma
Here you go:
http://www.liebert.com/dynamic/displayproduct.asp?ID=1042&cycles=60Hz
-Original Message-
From: Temkin, David
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 7:49 PM
To: 'E.B. Dreger'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: "They all suck!" Re: UPS failure modes (was: fire at
Liebert makes one, actually. The model # escapes me, but we considered
using it for equipment that's single powered. (We have uber power
redundancy..)
-Original Message-
From: E.B. Dreger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 7:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
If by Fire at nac.net, you mean their Firewall promotion, here you go:
http://www.nac.net/specials.asp#84
*duck*
(I see no reference to a fire on anything off their system status/other
pages)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28,
Title: Message
I sure
hope this isn't the future of Genuity
-Original Message-From: Steve Rude
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:46
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: OT: level3
contact
Can someone clueful at level3 please contact me ab
Title: Comcast contacts?
Does anyone have any contacts at Comcast that I might speak to RE: an issue that multiple users from my network are having with their comcast.net email via the web.
Basically, starting last week, numerous users have reported that they get 'session timed out' messages
Title: Message
... some very
interesting reading to follow up on the discussions that were had last month
regarding ATM machine security and PIN storage. Turns out CitiBank has a
serious flaw in their system that they'd rather everyone not know about.
As well, as was noted, the PIN numbers
This may help you, though I'm not sure what interface you're in need of:
http://catalog.radusa.com/radinc/datasheets/amc-101.pdf
> -Original Message-
> From: joe mcguckin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OC3 to DS3
FYI this is completely incorrect.
I have changed my PIN with both my PayPal debit card as well as my First
Union/Wachovia card numerous times without a single contact with a physical
bank.
See: http://www.wachovia.com/helpcenter/page/0,,2372_2705,00.html
To store the PIN on a card, whether hash
I think you're leaving out a very viable possibility in your summary...
What if BoA took a proactive approach and shut down their SQL environment
(even though none of us known conclusively if they're a SQL or Oracle shop)
to verify that it was in fact clean and not compromised. When you're
talki
Last night I saw an issue with connectivity between a domestic site in
Pennsylvania off of Level3's network connecting to a site on UUNet in
Australia - latency was almost triple of what it normally is...
Level3's response was of course "We don't see anything" - even with
traceroutes showing othe
34 matches
Mail list logo
