://www.cio.gov/
http://www.cio.gov/documents/IPv6_FAQs.pdf
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/a-1-fea.html
http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SMA/ispab/documents/minutes/2007-03/IPv6-NIST-ITL_ISPAB0307.pdf
Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 18, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Darden, Patrick S. wrote:
I'm looking
the tubes. :-)
-Jerry
concerns. There office is real responsive to Cyber Communication issues.
They're the ones that setup the Congressional Cyber Commission.
http://homeland.house.gov/about/subcommittees.asp?subcommittee=12
-Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
or the provider and brought to disaster sites on-demand.
It would be interesting to talk to someone that has used one during a major
event to get their take on them including spin up time to bring them online.
Jerry
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lorell
it was built
out.
Just to add a disclaimer, these are my opinions and not an official
stance by the government.
Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 13, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Alan Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry Dixon wrote:
We've looked at these from a DHS perspective and they are a great
concept
159.258
ms
25 * * *
26 * * *
27 * * *
28 * * *
29 * * *
and all the usual NOC numbers are either busy or fast-busy (!)
It's probably not a total melt-down, as our voice PRIs there are all
still OK.
//jbaltz
--
jerry b. altzman[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.jbaltz.com
thank you
that the EPO actually has a real valid
use that has been ACTUALLY PROVEN IN PRACTICE rather than just in
someone's mind.
-Jerry Is so anti EPO, he has no remote EPO buttons, and even
has the irrational fear about the jumper on the EPO terminal strip
inside his UPSes coming undone.
Is anyone else seeing significant congestion between ATT and
Broadwing in Dallas/Fort Worth?
-brandon
I have no idea if the following is related: (and frankly, I don't
care, for anyone that wants to flame me on it) ;-)
I was seeing it between Qwest and Level 3 since about November(!!!),
You can visit the US-CERT website at http://www.us-cert.gov/reading_room/ for
overview and recommendations on wireless.
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: Brandon Galbraith
To: MARLON BORBA
Cc: Deepak Jain ; nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 7:21 PM
Subject: Re
of government.
My .02
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: J. Oquendo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bill Woodcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Patrick W. Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: IP Block 99/8 (DHS insanity - offtopic)
Bill Woodcock wrote
work in this space.
If Doug is lurking out there he can provide much more info or insight into
this.
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 4:23 AM
Subject: RE: America takes over DNS
The US Department of Homeland
Not knowing anything about the case other than what I read in the
article, my hang up is that a transit provider can make a phone call
and destroy a customer's business with 30 minutes notice. On a DS3
that has actual real lead time to replace, that's a business killer.
The argument of
If no one's been sued before because they've wild carded a defunct
RBL, what's the big deal? When someone tries their best, goes out to
an intelligent group to get their opinions, and spends a HUGE amount
of effort, and incurs measurable monetary damage (bandwidth, time,
etc) and when the
, and assume (correctly so) that the rest is good.
Same concept applies to why we have police that chase criminals,
rather than just throwing everyone in prison by default and making
them prove that they're worth of being free.
-Jerry
. We've gotten a lot of great feedback
from many of you and its greatly appreciated. You know who you are :)
Especially some of the feedback related to the hardware OS issues.
-Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
-Original Message-
From
On Oct 13, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Routing Analysis Role Account wrote:
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 14 Oct, 2006
Analysis Summary
BGP routing table entries examined:
200339
Prefixes after maximum aggregation:
Sorry, I got several questions emailed to me, so I'll save my own
bandwidth at the expense of everyone else's, and hopefully answer
some people that didn't take the time/effort to ask...
The Dirty-Thirty is what I called the list of Aggregation Summery
in the cidr report (cidr-report.org)
of it happening aren't zero, but probably
pretty small. Enough so that it sure beats editing the BOGON list
manually!
-Jerry
One two three NOT IT!
Sorry, when I saw the subject, I couldn't resist.
We're notifying them via JTF-GNO (DOD-CERT).
As it relates to .mil's you can get to their site here: http://www.jtfgno.mil/
On government or .gov's you can reach us at www.us-cert.gov
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Geo. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 08:42 AM
Could you be more specific? Are you talking about Part VIII
DOMAIN NAME REGISTAR or something else?
rsw.
I like Part XIII, Subsecton 115. Thing. myself.
-Jerry
Maybe they had a parallel backup route 2mm diverse from the main
one. Do you think their fiber maps showed the same thing? :-)
be No]
Marketing will make up for lost customers, and trying to convince
people to forget that it ever happened, and rate increases and/or
insurance will make up for any lost revenue.
-Jerry
While it is always fun to call the government stupid, or anyone else
for that matter, there is a little more to the story.
- For one you do not need a backhoe to cut fiber
- Two, fiber carries a lot more than Internet traffic - cell phone,
911, financial tranactions, etc. etc.
- Three, while
FYI all, the Microsoft Official patch is out for WMF and available via Windows Update.Cheers,Jerry
As everyone else has said, fiber is best, but if that is not an option...
We have had good luck using these:
http://www.hyperlinktech.com/web/hgln_cat6.php
Trancievers will work as well, but that is a more expensive option.
Nothing is going to protect you from a direct strike.
Jerry
at shelters.
See the request below from ARRL.
There is an HF net setup and efforts under way by NCS down
there.
-Jerry
http://www.arrl.org
Attention All Amateurs...
Amateur Radio emergency communication volunteers needed!
(Sep 2, 2005) -- The ARRL now is seeking experienced Amateur
Radio
the information gets into the right hands. I
will say that I know many others on the list have been doing
a great job of identifying sites as well as reporting. SANS
ISC keep up the good work!
The information goes into Federal Law Enforcement who also
works with Local LE.
Jerry
Original
adaptation, and in most
cases, lower QoS.
-Jerry
.
//jbaltz
--
jerry b. altzman[EMAIL PROTECTED] KE3ML
thank you for contributing to the heat death of the universe.
playground... can't we just all get along? If
someone's going to load 50 kids on a merry-go-round, and get 50 more
kids to push it I'll just stand over by the monkey bars and try
to avoid the flying vomit. :-)
-Jerry
: nanog-outage may become more operationally
relevant than this list. :-)
-Jerry
Even though it is fed with N+1 UPS power, Qwest put N+1 rectifiers
batteries for their fiber cabinet they installed for me a few years
ago. At the time, batteries were required no matter what, and they
say they will replace them every 5 years. A little-town independent
telco however,
relay some of the operational realities back to
those folks but again, awareness and mitigation is the objective.
Suggestions or perspectives welcome :)
Cheers,
Jerry
(quickly putting on the flame retardant suit)
On May 24, 2005, at 6:27 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
The FTC said it would
.
BigCableCo, and BigTelco can fight over customers all they want, I'll
be happy with the table scraps. And since single miracle product
that can be everything for everyone, and perfectly meets everyone's
needs doesn't exist, and won't ever exist, there will be plenty of
scraps to be had.
-Jerry
.
That should be the tag line of every small business.
-Jerry
experiences, but figured it was for the
good of the group, and therefore, worth it. And I still think that.
-Jerry
something;
No discussion about me blocking port 53, ok? I got tired of gobs of
log files of script kiddies trying to download my domains 5 years
ago... I actually READ my logs besides, I had to keep the linux
boxes safe from the tyranny of bind 8 until they got upgraded. :-)
-Jerry
I posted to NANOG:
Jerry Pasker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fine. (after a few tries) I'm using BIND 9.2.4 without the eye pee
vee six stuff compiled in. Because I don't want to start something;
No discussion about me blocking port 53, ok? I got tired of gobs of
log files of script kiddies
solutions to these problems...uh-oh this is probably
their first move in getting a law. step 1) cause a public
outcry... so it's starting already.
I think we've all seen this act before.
Some days, the world really annoys me. :-(
-Jerry
This is the same company that runs Path MTU discovery on their web
servers, and then blocks ICMP at their border.
-Jerry
(Anybody here *NOT* seen cases where the 2 fibers leave the building
on opposite
sides, go down different streets - and rejoin 2 miles down the way because
there's only one convenient bridge/tunnel/etc over the river, or similar?)
Even if that's not the case, and it's still perfectly separated
everyone doesn't start doing this.
-Jerry
On Apr 15, 2005, at 1:13 AM, Jerry Pasker wrote:
Jeff Cole wrote:
Run bind locally on your laptop. There's a Win32 version available
if you're not running some sort of Unix or Linux on there. It's
what I do as my ISP's DNS is wonky at times, as is $ork's as they
choose to use Active Directory
servers are actually using the blacklist,
so it's impossible to gage the seriousness of the blacklist entry.
It's blacklist terrorism.
And yes, I'm still kicking around the idea of a bgp route feed style
aggregation blacklist. I wonder if that makes me an ip routing
terrorist? :-)
-Jerry
customers pay them them
really stupid money. So, who's stupid?
This is not only relevant to network operation, but life, as a whole.
It's not my opinion, it's the truth. (is it not a fun world we live in?)
-Jerry
to know the
difference well does anyone really care what those people
think anyway? ;-)
-Jerry
. I'd love to hear it discussed.
I'm going to repeat what I typed earlier:
Nothing is going to happen unless enough people (ASNs) take a
simultaneous, and UNITED stand, and make it painful for those that
don't care about the routes they leak to the net.
-Jerry
glad folks we're not shy about
sharing their thoughts with my team ;)
Cheers,
Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hannigan, Martin
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 1:18 AM
To: 'nanog
growth, would sponsor the creation of the t shirts
snicker...)
-Jerry
Operational comment, question:
I've learned that having an MTU smaller than 1500 bytes is a bad
thing. When encountering networks with MTUs smaller than 1500 bytes,
path MTU discovery breaks when sites like a computer science college
my friend is going to .edu, a certain 'us' online bank.com,
, and the implementation of all of it to
arrive back at the way life was pre-pMTUd+bad firewall.
/rant.
-Jerry
routing around the flapping link from A to T.
Stability good. Packet loss and latency, bad. Stability = damp.
-Jerry
, it happens to
everyone eventually) it doesn't get me damped by the rest of the
internet, and my connections to different transit providers can do
their job of carrying the traffic.
Dampening, in it's current state, really is a good idea.
-Jerry
saying of know your network really applies here.
In my book, the threat of dampening to anyone not playing nice is the
true value of route dampening. Automatic enforcement of etiquette.
-Jerry
.
smart
people. There will always be viruses, there will always be stupid
people. What does this have to do with network operations?
Are we, as network operators, supposed to protect people (stupid or
not) from themselves?
-Jerry
if that means that though no fault of my own, one of my
transit lines flaps, and gets me somewhat damped for an hour.
-Jerry
any time soon.
-Jerry
effort to get users to visit every spammer
web site they get, and click reload a few times also qualify as an
attack?
Remember: I'm assuming a properly written client.
-Jerry
with a memory rate high
enough, or CPU to memory bandwidth wide enough to handle it.
And when that time comes: I promise that any Cisco sales person will
have at least more than a handful of routers to sell you that'll
handle the load just fine.
I'm Jerry Pasker, and I approved this message.
from MOST of the corporate
network infrastructure maintainers out there. You must remember
to take us into account when talking about global addressing
policies. In the end, we pay most the bills. :-)
Jerry
a scenario that
is far to common in the corporate world.
Jerry
---Original Message---
From: Theo de Whaat
Date: 11/09/04 15:28:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
Get a firewall.You shouldn't rely on NAT to provide this
functionality.How lon
Do you have any idea of the *cost* of such a 'second cable' ?
Or how _long_ it takes to install?
Or how many 'hungry for business' undersea fiber installers would
line up to bid such a project? ;-)
(/me assumes there are some undersea fiber installers left.)
-Jerry
--
/mentalsoup/basic.htm
first.
-Jerry
--
that does not
directly effect the income. Reporting your problems to someone
who doesn't effect the income isn't going to result in the fixing of
any problems.
One only has to look at the telephone history to see that.
Jerry
Hi all,
We're situated firmly on ATT, and clients of ours who are behind
Level(3) are having connectivity issues reaching us. Are there any known
problems?
ATT has reported some to me, I am just curious if it is just the T/L3
link or if it is a bigger L3 problem.
Thanks!
//jbaltz
--
jerry b
soon.
Jerry
An interesting thought...
Jerry
Jerry,
One question - if I previously typed in an URL that was incorrect and would get the usual response from my OWN system, there would be not a real lot of data sent/received to pay for that mistake. Now that Verisign is doing their current thing
register has got some tweaking to do on their web scripts to ignore
wildcard responses...
But, shows another side effect of V's unilateral action.
Jerry
millions of dollars in free advertising eye-time over any of the competition
Jerry
Ahhh...
You don't put battery backup on a kill-all switch
The idea behind it is to kill-all!! (*doh*) If you ever need to press it,
you do so just before the guys-with-foam run in to douse your burning UPS...
Jerry
---Original Message---
From: Eric Brunner-Williams
obvious IPv6 won, but I am curious as
to why...
Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Darren Bolding wrote:
There appears to have been some difficulty inside ATT's network the last
few minutes. It appears to have been resolved. I don't have a
master-ticket number or such yet.
Try 201975
--D
//jbaltz
--
jerry b. altzman[EMAIL PROTECTED]+1 646 230 8750
Thank you
accurate that anything else and it's available everywhere you can see a
reasonable amount of the sky with no service charge. Other than that I
can't see why people would do it.
jerry
Add a "metoo" here. Unless we all have visited some other site in common...
Jerry
---Original Message---
From: Daniel Karrenberg
Date: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 04:22:04 PM
To: Dominic J. Eidson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Metoo Was: Pesky spammers are using my mailbox
75 matches
Mail list logo
