Re: 12/8 problems? (fwd)

2005-09-15 Thread Manish Karir
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:39:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Manish Karir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: 12/8 problems? I'm sorry I'm a bit late on this thread but wanted to point out that you can view some of the relevan

Re: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-12 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 06:15:38AM -0700, Eric Louie wrote: > > FYI, happened again this morning for (at least) 12/8 > duration approx 30 minutes > starting at 5:45 AM PDT. Notice that AT&T is no longer taking chances, and is announcing 2 /9s. -- Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-10 Thread Eric Louie
FYI, happened again this morning for (at least) 12/8 duration approx 30 minutes starting at 5:45 AM PDT.

Re: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-09 Thread Petri Helenius
Drew Linsalata wrote: Richard A Steenbergen wrote: $10 says someone forgot "ip classless". Is there a valid argument for making "ip classless" the default in the IOS? Seems to me that it would only solve problems, but I don't profess to be a routing guru, especially in comparison to fo

Re: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-09 Thread Robert E . Seastrom
"Israel, David B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, my practical solution to this one is max-prefixing your peers. > It means you have to watch your peers slow growth, but frankly, you > should be watching that anyway. Max-prefix is part of the battle. A corollary "max-aggregate" where

RE: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-09 Thread Steve Gibbard
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Israel, David B. wrote: Richard A Steenbergen wrote on Friday, September 09, 2005 11:57 AM: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:44:05AM -0400, Drew Linsalata wrote: Looks like 26210 is originating the prefixes and Telefonica is happily passing them along to the world, at leas

Re: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-09 Thread John Neiberger
>12.0.0.0/8 >64.0.0.0/8 >65.0.0.0/8 And wouldn't you know it, we have an application that needs to reach servers in 12/8 and 65/8, and someone just came over to me asking for help in figuring out why that application isn't working. I guess I should have checked my NANOG mail before I told them I

RE: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-09 Thread Israel, David B.
Richard A Steenbergen wrote on Friday, September 09, 2005 11:57 AM: >On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:44:05AM -0400, Drew Linsalata wrote: >> >> Looks like 26210 is originating the prefixes and Telefonica is happily >> passing them along to the world, at least some portion of which is glad >> to g

Re: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-09 Thread Drew Linsalata
Richard A Steenbergen wrote: $10 says someone forgot "ip classless". Is there a valid argument for making "ip classless" the default in the IOS? Seems to me that it would only solve problems, but I don't profess to be a routing guru, especially in comparison to folks in this forum. -- D

Re: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-09 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:44:05AM -0400, Drew Linsalata wrote: > > Looks like 26210 is originating the prefixes and Telefonica is happily > passing them along to the world, at least some portion of which is glad > to go along for the ride. > > Q. How does the Internet work? > A. Spit and glue

Re: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-09 Thread Drew Linsalata
Richard A Steenbergen wrote: Looks like 12956 is announcing some /8s to every peer and transit. Worse still, Sprint and GX are propagating it. This is not the first time that Telefonica has leaked a lot of garbage routes with serious network impact as a result (nor is it the second or third,

Re: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-09 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:25:25AM -0400, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > > Looks like 12956 is announcing some /8s to every peer and transit. Worse > still, Sprint and GX are propagating it. This is not the first time that > Telefonica has leaked a lot of garbage routes with serious network imp

Re: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-09 Thread william(at)elan.net
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:12:25AM -0400, Drew Linsalata wrote: Apologies for a post of an operational nature, but is anyone else seeing problems with AT&Ts 12/8 block? From a New York router connected to Global Crossing and Peer 1: border-1

Re: 12/8 problems?

2005-09-09 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:12:25AM -0400, Drew Linsalata wrote: > > Apologies for a post of an operational nature, but is anyone else seeing > problems with AT&Ts 12/8 block? > > From a New York router connected to Global Crossing and Peer 1: > > border-1.nycmny> sh ip bgp 12.xxx.xxx.xxx > >

12/8 problems?

2005-09-09 Thread Drew Linsalata
Apologies for a post of an operational nature, but is anyone else seeing problems with AT&Ts 12/8 block? From a New York router connected to Global Crossing and Peer 1: border-1.nycmny> sh ip bgp 12.xxx.xxx.xxx BGP routing table entry for 12.0.0.0/8, version 86901457 Paths: (2 available, bes