CTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> > Todd A. Blank
> >
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Huston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:57 AM
To: Hsu, Vicky; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters
In return, would Covad please consider performing some
IL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:58 AM
To: Todd A. Blank; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Todd A. Blank
>
> We were an early user of the 69/8 address space. I started the original
> thread on this subject back in Sept/Oct 2002. While I am very disturbed
> (but not surprised) to find out that
: 69.0.0.0/8 - Please update your filters
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Haesu wrote:
> And how quickly would those ASN's respond to or even comprehend the
> bogon-filter update notices? If those ASN's are competent and
> quick-responsive ones, we should not even be having these prroblems t
In return, would Covad please consider performing some meaningful form of
route
aggregation or other measures to reduce the amount of noise that is being
passed across the global routing tables that originates from Covad?
http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS18566&view=4637
suggests
From: "E.B. Dreger"
>
> Even after the NANOG thread months back? Yuck.
>
Yes. This last weekend, the state network added a Bogon list to their
routers. Too bad the list they chose still had 69/8 in it. Not that I mind.
The complaint came from a customer who's multi-homed between us. I like it
wh
As a brief reminder and in addition to the URLs below folks are also
welcome to peer with the Team-Cymru's bogon route server which will
automatically and securely update your bogon filters for you.
Instructions are available at:
http://www.cymru.com/Bogons/index.html
Cheers,
-- steve
[EMAIL PRO
> If the alternative is getting space, giving it to customers, and
> explaining why they can't reach X, Y, and Z on their connection to us, but
> they can on other internet connections, we're going to at least have to
> try.
True, but we'd have to try something that would be effective... Imagine
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Haesu wrote:
> And how quickly would those ASN's respond to or even comprehend the
> bogon-filter update notices? If those ASN's are competent and
> quick-responsive ones, we should not even be having these prroblems to
> begin with.
If the alternative is getting space, givi
SS> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:46:53 -0600
SS> From: Stephen Sprunk
(Props to whoever thought up what you put in the "To" field)
SS> From an academic standpoint, that would be a very interesting
SS> experiment. However, most of us are paid to keep our
SS> networks or services running, not to in
> Somebody with one of these new cursed allocations ought to setup a system
> with two IPs (one from the new block, one from an older established block)
> and do reachability tests to various parts of the net, and then automate
> sending a notice of bogus filters to those ASNs reachable from the o
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> Thus spake "E.B. Dreger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I _still_ like the idea of putting DNS roots in new IP blocks
> > during sunrise and having the final octet be .0 and/or .255. It
> > would be nice to catch dated bogon filters, lame attempts at
> > smu
Thus spake "E.B. Dreger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I _still_ like the idea of putting DNS roots in new IP blocks
> during sunrise and having the final octet be .0 and/or .255. It
> would be nice to catch dated bogon filters, lame attempts at
> smurf stopping, _and_ stale root.cache in one blow.
Fro
HV> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:09:26 -0800
HV> From: "Hsu, Vicky"
HV> It has recently come to our attention that many Internet
HV> routers are still filtering out IP addresses in the
HV> 69.0.0.0/8 range. If YOU are still filtering this block in
Even after the NANOG thread months back? Yuck.
I
-Original Message-
From: Chan, KaLun
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:18 PM
To: Chan, KaLun; DL NOC Managers; DL NOC-IP Services
Cc: Eisenhart, William; Minter, Daniel; DL Neteng-core-ip
Subject: RE: [ARIN-20030123.943] 69.3.0.0/Covad - who had this block before?
All,
It has recentl
16 matches
Mail list logo
