Network Analyst
CCNA/MCP/MCSA
Thanks for your EXCELLENT example of how technical certification
programs are no guarantee of fundamental technical understanding.
P.S. If you don't ask the right questions you will never get the right
answers.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 6:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
Thanks for your EXCELLENT example of how technical certification
programs are no guarantee of fundamental technical understanding.
P.S
On Mar 1, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Christopher Aldridge wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 6:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
Thanks for your EXCELLENT example of how technical certification
programs
-Original Message-
From: Patrick W.Gilmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
Please do not take this the wrong way, but I thought it was useful
input. Perhaps not to you, but maybe to those who think that getting
their MCSA will teach them
On Mar 1, 2004, at 12:59 PM, Christopher Aldridge wrote:
Please do not take this the wrong way, but I thought it was useful
input. Perhaps not to you, but maybe to those who think that getting
their MCSA will teach them all they need to know.
One who thinks these exam topics cover (as you say
Consumers are not interested in certificates, they want solutions that are
packaged. Front end services when people sign up for accounts should include
allthe tools necessary for survive on any network you provider access to.
-Henry"Patrick W.Gilmore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 1, 2004, at
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Christopher Aldridge wrote:
know, should really investigate this certification.
Some of the things you asked were extremely basic.
What things were these?
How about the question about whether or not a usb ethernet adapter was an
ethernet converter?
You're the one who
You wanna know about USB read this and that doesn't take an MSCEhttp://www.usb.org/faq
Andy Dills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Christopher Aldridge wrote: know", should really investigate this certification. Some of the things you asked were extremely basic. What "things" were
NOTE: I have been a nanog observer for nearly a year. The
following may be slightly off topic, but it seems as though nanog is my last
hope.
Recently at work, Ive been battling fellow
coworkers on a very simple debate. The fact that I will not give
in on my argument really makes me look
USB in this scenario would be synonymous with PCI, in regards
to the type of technology that interfaces with the cpu.
Yes.
3) Just because a device has two physical mediums of
connectivity, dosent make it a ?converter?. My coworkers argue that a
USB Ethernet adapter is an
just say no to html
html xmlns:o=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office
xmlns:w=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word
xmlns:st1=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags
xmlns=http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40;
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=us-ascii
Randy Bush [2/29/2004 7:53 PM] :
just say no to html
and to top posting and fullquoting all the ugly, malformed microsoft
html [1] as well, I hope? :)
srs
[1] I kind of repeated myself there, I fear
html xmlns:o=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office
--
srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Christopher Aldridge wrote:
Is a USB Ethernet Adapter a converter?
Personally, I say no.
My coworkers seem to say yes.
I suspect the truth is that it is and it isnt... the complication being what you
mean by terms like 'Ethernet' which comprises a number of standards
I suspect what the
convertor does is take the frame, and send it out the USB in whatever format it
needs to be data intact.
It sends highly processed(/extracted) data to a device driver running on
the PC. Just like an ethernet adapter on a PC-card would. If it were in
any sense still ethernet
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 08:47:21PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Randy Bush [2/29/2004 7:53 PM] :
just say no to html
and to top posting and fullquoting all the ugly, malformed microsoft
html [1] as well, I hope? :)
urlview and lynx are your firends...
-ron
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 01:54:36PM -0500, Ron da Silva wrote:
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 08:47:21PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Randy Bush [2/29/2004 7:53 PM] :
just say no to html
and to top posting and fullquoting all the ugly, malformed microsoft
html [1] as well, I
16 matches
Mail list logo
