[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Jeftovic) writes:
> Verisign sold off NetSol to Pivotal Private Equity last year for 100
> million, which takes them out of the registrar space and leaves them
> as the registry.
it'll be several quarters, and one audited annual report, before we'll
know how much control
http://techupdate.zdnet.com/special_report/Stratton_Sclavos.html
> Verisign is really two entities wrt .com/net - it is the registry and the
> registrar.
Verisign Registrar, aka Network Solutions, was sold off to Pivotal Private
Equity last Fall.
Other lines of analysis to attempt:
o what are "registry services" and what are not.
o if a "reg
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> Verisign is really two entities wrt .com/net - it is the registry and the
> registrar. As a registrar it occupies the same position as the many other
> registrars.. tucows, melbourne, joker etc .. as a registry it occupies a
> privileged position in
> Not, I hasten to add, that I support Sitefinder or WLS (although I think I
> like "consolidate"). But what I like isn't the issue. Even if having
Just to recap here, this thread plus the articles I'm reading miss one of the
major points (a commercial one essentialy)..
Verisign is really tw
Since no one else has mentioned this:
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
> http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
can't say I'm surprised. Another nail in the Verisign coffin.
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Deepak Jain wrote:
> Since no one else has mentioned this:
>
> http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
Looks like I need to stock up on popcorn.
--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 8
Neil J. McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/26/04 3:03:52 PM >>>
>
>> http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
>
>can't say I'm surprised. Another nail in the Verisign coffin.
They must have taken a page from the recently-released book "How to Shoot Your Company
in the Foot," by SCO.
*
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Deepak Jain wrote:
>
> Since no one else has mentioned this:
>
> http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
And I'm sure ICANN will remember it for long time - right up to the point
when Verisign's contracts for .com/.net management are up for renewal.
--
Willia
When are they up for renewal exactly?
william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Deepak Jain wrote:
Since no one else has mentioned this:
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
And I'm sure ICANN will remember it for long time - right up to the point
when Verisign's co
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Roman Volf wrote:
>
> When are they up for renewal exactly?
November 10, 2007, according to
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-com-25may01.htm
-S
in response to...
> http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040226/tech_verisign_2.html
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4; nmh 1.0.4; GNU Emacs 21.3.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil J. McRae) writes:
> can't say I'm surprised. Another nail in the Verisign coffin.
it's not nearly that simple.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("John Neiberger") add
For ICANN/Registry agreements see here:
http://www.icann.org/registries/agreements.htm
Specific agreements & all technical specs Verisign agreed to follow:
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/com-index.htm
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/net-index.htm
And based on tha
Any way to speed that up? ;)
John
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 03:57:12PM -0800, Scott Call wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Roman Volf wrote:
> > When are they up for renewal exactly?
> November 10, 2007, according to
> http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-com-25may01.htm
By the way, do we even know what we're talking about? Specifically, has
VeriSign produced a set of specifications for exactly what SiteFinder is and
does?
For example, is it guaranteed to return the same A record for all
unregistered domains? Is it guaranteed that that A record w
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, John Kinsella wrote:
> > > When are they up for renewal exactly?
> > November 10, 2007, according
>
> Any way to speed that up? ;)
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-com-25may01.htm
"16. Termination
...
B. In the event of termination by DOC of its
The lawsuit is not premature to the extent that
1. VRSN were told (however justly) to cease and desist Site Finder 1.0 or
else face consequences.
2. VRSN were told they couldn't implement the "Consolidate" service
without making other concessions [according to the complaint the service
allowed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("william(at)elan.net") writes:
> ...
> And based on that Verisign rule over these tlds ends in November 2007
no. See page 19 of:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID475281_code70168.pdf?abstractid=475281
i think that verisign and icann are stuck with each other,
Scott Call wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Roman Volf wrote:
When are they up for renewal exactly?
November 10, 2007, according to
http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-com-25may01.htm
-S
I think as far as Verisign is concerned, they might not be an ongoing
concern in 200
> By the way, do we even know what we're talking about?
that is not needed to flame folk such as verisign. lynch mobs
look pretty good until you are the one on guantanamo.
randy
21 matches
Mail list logo
