Remote control servers was:(Re: Personal Co-location Registry)

2004-03-22 Thread Michael . Dillon
Weasel, like the sun implementation, allows remote reboot of wedged machines. This is key, particularly when running on an Intel platform cough. If there are any PC serial console implementations that allow one to do this, I'd like to hear about it, since I'm not aware of such. Buying a serial

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-22 Thread Simon Lockhart
On Mon Mar 22, 2004 at 12:11:04PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One serial port is for a daisy-chained serial bus that can allow one control module to talk to other boxen. Personally, I have a major dislike for daisy-chained control buses like this. All it needs is one box at the start of

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-22 Thread Brandon Butterworth
IMHO the right way to do this is to build the power cycling capability into the individual 1U boxen. Again, we should be talking to the embedded systems folks to give them a standard set of requirements that everyone can support. See Sun Netra LOM. Done. This may be worth having a

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-22 Thread jeffrey.arnold
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :: IMHO the right way to do this is to build the power cycling :: capability into the individual 1U boxen. Again, we You've probably seen it already, but nonetheless: http://www.rackable.com/products/compute.htm -jba __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ::

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-22 Thread Michael Hanulec
:: IMHO the right way to do this is to build the power cycling :: capability into the individual 1U boxen. Again, we You've probably seen it already, but nonetheless: http://www.rackable.com/products/compute.htm this is IPMI. tons of motherboard manufactures do this today (i just don't

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-20 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
John Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: While I do prefer a real serial LOM kit (i.e.: Sun Microsystems) ... RealWeasel is too expensive (even with the hypothetical NANOG discount) though extremely nice. As previously mentioned, I can purchase an entire system with serial console built

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-20 Thread Michael Hanulec
many servers are also starting to feature IPMI [EMAIL PROTECTED] which allows for the remote console (that provides the VGA output slow.. only good for emergencies or for Windows servers) and power cycling of servers. Compaq/HP includes this feature in their Proliant servers, and many other

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-20 Thread Paul Vixie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Hanulec) writes: many servers are also starting to feature IPMI ... if somebody posts a summary of command/control options for remote colo boxes i'd love to include it, or a pointer to it, at www.vix.com/personalcolo. i like the pc-weasel but i admit that my main

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-20 Thread Deepak Jain
many servers are also starting to feature IPMI ... i'm happy to add to the registry a list of things like pc-weasel and rtty and rocketport, but i'd like to have some confidence that it's a comprehensive list, which means that someone more familiary with the field has to build it. -- If someone

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-20 Thread Micah McNelly
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 3:42 PM Subject: Re: Personal Co-location Registry many servers are also starting to feature IPMI ... i'm happy to add to the registry a list of things like pc-weasel and rtty and rocketport, but i'd like to have some confidence that it's

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-20 Thread Adam Rothschild
On 2004-03-20-18:42:10, Deepak Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If someone is doing this, especially wrt to 1U servers, perhaps someone could provide a pointer to a reboot solution that would allow a single reboot device to control 42+ 1Us in a single rack. From my occasional interest in this

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-20 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 04:02:37PM -0800, Micah McNelly wrote: You could use dual vertical PDU's with serial management connected to a 1u serial console / KVM solution. There are a few vendors working on PDU's with IP / SNMP based management solutions but I don't think they have been

RE: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-19 Thread Brandon Butterworth
I can imagine what a rack full of 1U's from varying vendors with different cable management systems would be like. It can be tricky. Single vendor helps, even simpler if it's all Sun - http://www.bogons.net/pics/bogons_20021205b.jpg http://www.bogons.net/pics/bogons_20031005a.jpg Sun Netras

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-19 Thread Krzysztof Adamski
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Joel Jaeggli wrote: On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Kelly Setzer wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:07:31AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Vixie writes: I agree, lack of interactive access to a system prior to a functional OS

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-19 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Krzysztof Adamski wrote: The pc-weasel does not work in all motherboards also. It does require a 5volt 32bit pci slot. and a ps/2 keyboard port, and it won't work with an ami-winbios among other things... In many respects the weasel is begining to show it's age, but

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-19 Thread Chris Brookes
Joel Jaeggli wrote: The killer feature (that I'm willing to pay monay for for one of these products) is having a unit that can remotely power-cycle the box when the os is totally hung. We used to do this (and still do), with serially Recent Compaq systems with integrated remote ILO provide a

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Sean Donelan
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Paul Vixie wrote: http://www.vix.com/personalcolo/ http://www.vix.com/personalcolo/ http://www.vix.com/personalcolo/ As of March 17 2004 Total personal colo listings: 36 Total providers with one or more addresses block listed: 18 The eighteen providers are sometimes

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Steven M. Bellovin
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Vixie writes: I agree, lack of interactive access to a system prior to a functional OS being loaded always seemed like a potential problem area to me, particularly for something based on common PC architecture. http://www.realweasel.com/ is your friend.

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Kelly Setzer
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:07:31AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Vixie writes: I agree, lack of interactive access to a system prior to a functional OS being loaded always seemed like a potential problem area to me, particularly for something

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Joel Jaeggli
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Kelly Setzer wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:07:31AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Vixie writes: I agree, lack of interactive access to a system prior to a functional OS being loaded always seemed like a potential

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Paul Vixie
i've already removed one that was seen on ROKSO (23 listings). i don't consider the lists you gave to be credible, but if any of the entries in the personal colo registry show up on ROKSO or SBL or MAPS or SORBS, you can bet i'll remove them instantly. re: SPEWS: 7 BLARS: 5

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Mr. James W. Laferriere
Hello All , On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Joel Jaeggli wrote: On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Kelly Setzer wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:07:31AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: ...snip... Is there an effective alternative? All the intel servers these days seem to have one of those handy-dandy

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Paul Vixie
Realweasel is a great idea if you can afford it -- but the PCI version lists for $350, which is as expensive as some used 1U servers on EBay. my bet is that if you refer to nanog and www.vix.com/personalcolo when you contact them, they'll cut you a deal. (note: i have no affiliation w/

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! i've already removed one that was seen on ROKSO (23 listings). i don't consider the lists you gave to be credible, but if any of the entries in the personal colo registry show up on ROKSO or SBL or MAPS or SORBS, you can bet i'll remove them instantly. SPEWS: 7 BLARS: 5

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread jlewis
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: Tyan ( another I can't remember now) have console forwarding to the com1 port . This MB is available in PenguinComputing's 1u 2u systems . They run *BSD just fine as well . Hth , JimL Many of Intel's server boards

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread John Todd
At 9:51 AM -0600 on 3/18/04, Kelly Setzer wrote: On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 09:07:31AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Vixie writes: I agree, lack of interactive access to a system prior to a functional OS being loaded always seemed like a potential problem

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Paul Vixie
i've already removed one that was seen on ROKSO (23 listings). i don't consider the lists you gave to be credible, but if any of the entries in the personal colo registry show up on ROKSO or SBL or MAPS or SORBS, you can bet i'll remove them instantly. ... Even if the COLO space might

RE: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Matt Bazan
sorry for off-topic post, but.. hey paul, why are you blocking mail from 12.129.199.61 and 65.160.228.34? The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 3/18/2004 10:45 AM mail39-haw-R.bigfish.com #5.0.0 X-Postfix; host sa.vix.com[204.152.187.1] said: 553 Service

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Paul Vixie
hey paul, why are you blocking mail from 12.129.199.61 and because att's abuse desk ignored me for too long. 65.160.228.34? because sprint's abuse desk ignored me for too long. i'll give sprint a second chance (i've removed that /16 from my personal blackhole list and see what happens) but

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Avleen Vig
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 06:20:51PM +, Paul Vixie wrote: Realweasel is a great idea if you can afford it -- but the PCI version lists for $350, which is as expensive as some used 1U servers on EBay. my bet is that if you refer to nanog and www.vix.com/personalcolo when you contact

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread Paul Vixie
People seem to be forgetting the obvious. Buy a 1U SPARC box. That'll do full console as you're talking about. They're simple to connect up to your Cisco console too. Ebay for 'netra'. 1U Alphas (DS10L) are also quite nice.

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread TxRx Lists
Steven M. Bellovin wrote: Realweasel is a great idea if you can afford it -- but the PCI version lists for $350, which is as expensive as some used 1U servers on EBay. It'd be better if it had an ethernet port on it and allowed ssh access to the console, like the remote ILO stuff on compaq

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-18 Thread just me
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Kelly Setzer wrote: This is relevant, if tangential, to the current discussion on 1U colo for remote ops/looking glass/etc. [...] 4) One nanog member indicated that I am an idiot. Personally, I recently priced intel server systems from a variety of major vendors

Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-17 Thread Paul Vixie
http://www.vix.com/personalcolo/ http://www.vix.com/personalcolo/ http://www.vix.com/personalcolo/ notes: (1) even in germany they call them 19 inch racks, thus setting the clock back several decades. (2) i'm very interested in listing more non-US locations (3) i'm interested in listing

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-17 Thread Steven M. Bellovin
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Vixie writes: http://www.vix.com/personalcolo/ http://www.vix.com/personalcolo/ http://www.vix.com/personalcolo/ notes: (1) even in germany they call them 19 inch racks, thus setting the clock back several decades. (2) i'm very interested in listing more

Re: Personal Co-location Registry

2004-03-17 Thread Paul Vixie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (TxRx Lists) writes: One thing you may want to devote a bit more text to: what are typical provisions for remote hands at these places? that's one item. others are serial console access, remote power cycle, whether an appointment/escort is required for on-site