( You can said that it means nothing but... (; )
I second that. I always crimp (or check) for it.
Also watch for Cat 6 cabling ... 23 gauge is hell to crimp. 24 is
livable but takes twice as much time to do than Cat 5e.
(You have to cut that little plastic guide and the pairs are
According to "Ethernet, The Definitive Guide", that feature is an
optional part of the spec.
One thing I've heard people encounter is that if they use a cross-over
cable, which probably really implies a 100BASE-TX cross-over, then the
ports only go to 100Mbps. A Gig-E rated straight through, in
y Bush
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems connectivity GE on Foundry BigIron to
Cisco 2950T
Hi Randy,
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:10:04 -1000
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You are using a crossover cable right?
I'm having a right mare
>
>
> Hi Randy,
>
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:10:04 -1000
> Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > > You are using a crossover cable right?
> > >> I'm having a right mare trying to get a Foundry BigIron to
> > >> connect up to a cisco 2950T, via Gigabit copper.
> >
> > i was under the
Randy Bush
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems connectivity GE on Foundry BigIron to
Cisco 2950T
Hi Randy,
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:10:04 -1000
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You are using a crossover cable right?
I'm having a right
Thanks Mark - just found the same thing out myself :)
S
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Mark Smith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:24:35 + (GMT Standard Time)
Sam Stickland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Mark Smith wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:50:07 + (GMT Standard Time)
S
Wikipedia reveals all. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossover_cable
Turns out that for 1000Base-T crossovers pairs 2 and 3, and 1 and 4 have
to swapped. Standard TIA-568B to TIA-568A over swaps 2 and 3.
Auto MDI/MDI-X is optional in the 1000Base-T spec so the way forward is to
try a straight
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:24:35 + (GMT Standard Time)
Sam Stickland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Mark Smith wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:50:07 + (GMT Standard Time)
> > Sam Stickland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> The cabli
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Mark Smith wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:50:07 + (GMT Standard Time)
Sam Stickland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The cabling arrangement is:
Foundry -- Straight -- Patch -- Underfloor -- Patch -- Crossover -- Cisco
GBIC Cable Panel Straight
On Jan 15, 2006, at 6:02 PM, Sam Stickland wrote:
Replying to my own email..
I've found some sites that suggest it's not possible to disable
auto-negotiation on 1000Base-T since other operational parameters
are negotiated including selection of the master clock signal. I
was aware that
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:50:07 + (GMT Standard Time)
Sam Stickland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The cabling arrangement is:
>
> Foundry -- Straight -- Patch -- Underfloor -- Patch -- Crossover -- Cisco
> GBIC Cable Panel Straight Panel Cable
>
> If I r
t;David Hubbard"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sam Stickland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: Problems connectivity GE on Foundry BigIron to Cisco 2950T
Cisco commands-
speed 1000
duplex full
the bigiron w
MAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sam Stickland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: Problems connectivity GE on Foundry BigIron to Cisco 2950T
Cisco commands-
speed 1000
duplex full
the bigiron wants (iirc):
spe 1000-
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 4:45 PM
Subject: RE: Problems connectivity GE on Foundry BigIron to Cisco 2950T
Cisco commands-
speed 1000
duplex full
the bigiron wants (iirc):
spe 1000-full
i strongly suggest you peruse the cli reference for both devices.
On the
Hi Randy,
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:10:04 -1000
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You are using a crossover cable right?
> >> I'm having a right mare trying to get a Foundry BigIron to
> >> connect up to a cisco 2950T, via Gigabit copper.
>
> i was under the impression that gige spec h
- Original Message -
From: "Farrell,Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Randy Bush" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "David Hubbard"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Sam Stickland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, Jan
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problems connectivity GE on Foundry BigIron to Cisco 2950T
> You are using a crossover cable right?
>> I'm having a right mare trying to get a Foundry BigIron to
>> connect up to a cisco 2950T, via Gigabit copper.
i was under the impression that gige sp
> You are using a crossover cable right?
>> I'm having a right mare trying to get a Foundry BigIron to
>> connect up to a cisco 2950T, via Gigabit copper.
i was under the impression that gige spec handled crossover
automagically
randy
Hi,
Yup, it's definately a cross-over cable. ;) I had already tried this
suggestion but the cisco 2950T doesn't appear to have the "no nego auto"
command :/
(config)#int Gi0/2
(config-if)#no n?
% Unrecognized command
(config-if)#no n
(config-if)#no neg auto
^
% Invalid input d
You are using a crossover cable right? If that's all set, you
do need to have neg-off on the Foundry and "no nego auto" on the
Cisco. I haven't used the rj-45 gbics in the Foundry equipment
before, not sure if that could be an issue. I would go with
the hard set 1000-full on both sides.
David
Hi,
I'm having a right mare trying to get a Foundry BigIron to connect up to a
cisco 2950T, via Gigabit copper.
The Foundry BigIron is using a cisco RJ45/copper GBIC that was pulled from
a live cisco 6500, where it was working fine. The cisco 2950T has two
fixed 10/100/1000 RJ45 ports.
Th
21 matches
Mail list logo
