Forwarded Message
>
> Date:29 Sep 2002 06:08:40 -
> From: Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: AP IX locations
>
>
> > >I would confirm GM's assertion. Also, if you have the luxury of caring
> > >more abo
> I have heard that the new paix switch will be attached [to laap] as well.
> But only rumored not sure if its true.
it's true. there was a launch party recently when the paix switch was
announced for 1 wilshire, and laap was absolutely mentioned along with
the words "just like seattle" with re
USC/ISI
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --- Forwarded Message
>
> Date:29 Sep 2002 06:08:40 -
> From:Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: AP IX locations
>
>
> > >I would confirm GM's assertion. Also,
.
Celeste Anderson
LAAP Operations Manager (among other things)
USC/ISI
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Forwarded Message
Date:29 Sep 2002 06:08:40 -
From:Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AP IX locations
> >I would confirm GM's assertion.
I'm not sure how much is supposed to be discussed about the paix la
project but I know we're going to turn up peering there, meeting with
our Paix sales person tomorrow. Still, Paix pao seems to have a lot of
asian carriers. Most of which were very very open to peering there.
On 29
Sep 2002
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 01:27:38PM -0700, Barry Raveendran Greene wrote:
> 1:1 figure for people age 18 - 60. Add these indicators to the fact that
> most of the Internet market dominating companies are the old PTTs. All these
> PTT (control freaks) are now Telcos (out to maximize share holder pr
L PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Dorian Kim
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:43 AM
> To: keichii
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Neil J. McRae
> Subject: Re: AP IX locations
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:30:42PM -0500, keichii wrote:
> >
> >I would confirm GM's assertion. Also, if you have the luxury of caring
> >more about a smaller set of large-capacity Tier1 private peers, there is
> >some presence of AsiaPac providers doing this at Equinix SJ.
>
> Actually Equinix-Los Angeles has more Asian based Networks coming in for
> t
> A handful of incumbent telcos of AP region countries as well as few others
> operate multigigabit IP networks across the Pacific. I don't think they'd
> agree with your statement.
>
Dorian is absolutely right here. There are even some incumbent telcos (not only from
AP) with capacity between
|Given the enormous scope of the question, the US west coast almost
|sounds like an effective common denominator *regardless* of the
|state of interconnection within the region, or the history of
|US-centric traffic demand and under-sea cable routes.
PAIX alone can supply 10-15k of AP routes,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 04:52:33PM -0400, ren wrote:
>
> At 01:37 PM 9/26/2002 -0700, Lane Patterson wrote:
> >I would confirm GM's assertion. Also, if you have the luxury of caring
> >more about a smaller set of large-capacity Tier1 private peers, there is
> >some presence of AsiaPac providers
At 01:37 PM 9/26/2002 -0700, Lane Patterson wrote:
>I would confirm GM's assertion. Also, if you have the luxury of caring
>more about a smaller set of large-capacity Tier1 private peers, there is
>some presence of AsiaPac providers doing this at Equinix SJ.
Actually Equinix-Los Angeles has mor
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 11:45:53AM -0400, German Martinez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > |I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in
> > > |a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have
> > > |ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue that I'm
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 02:43:19PM -0400, Dorian Kim scribbled:
| On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:30:42PM -0500, keichii wrote:
| > Above.net and AT&T are your best bets for operations based in the Americas.
| > Above has a .jp IX/colo that is almost "the" best connected place in AP.
| > ATT and Above
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:30:42PM -0500, keichii wrote:
>
> From: "Neil J. McRae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in
> > a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have
> > ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue tha
From: "Neil J. McRae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in
> a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have
> ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue that I'm
> trying to resolve, so I was wondering if there was a locatio
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 08:36:02AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
> > sadly the best spot to interconnect is not in the AP region, its in Palo
> > Alto.
>
> Is this really still true?
I would not be surprised to find that it is.
Asia Pacific is an enormous region with lots of inconvenient ocean
al
> > |I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in
> > |a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have
> > |ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue that I'm
> > |trying to resolve, so I was wondering if there was a location/IXP
> > |in the AP region th
On 9/26/02 2:28 AM, "James Spenceley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in
> |a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have
> |ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue that I'm
> |trying to resolve, so I was wonde
> |I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in
> |a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have
> |ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue that I'm
> |trying to resolve, so I was wondering if there was a location/IXP
> |in the AP region that would
|I'm looking to improve my connectivity into the AP region, in
|a cost effective [i.e. for as little as possible :-)]. I have
|ruled out buying transit as it doesn't help the issue that I'm
|trying to resolve, so I was wondering if there was a location/IXP
|in the AP region that would enable me
21 matches
Mail list logo
