>> now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence and rant
>> about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how they will go on to
>> reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger & better company.
> I think at this point we are all long past the innocent stage and
> rapidly approac
On Thursday 06 June 2002 02:46 pm, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
> form of bankruptcy. Chapter 11 is a reorg, typically.
...in theory, anyway.
--
Grant A. Kirkwood - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fingerprint = D337 48C4 4D00 232D 3444 1D5D 27F6 055A BF0C 4AED
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > http://biz.yahoo.com/djus/020605/200206051047000419_1.html
>
> now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence and rant
> about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how they will go on to
> reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger
> now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence and rant
> about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how they will go on to
> reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger & better company.
I think at this point we are all long past the innocent stage and
rapidly approaching a
DH> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 12:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
DH> From: Dan Hollis
DH> now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence
DH> and rant about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how
DH> they will go on to reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger
DH> & better company.
Heh. W
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> http://biz.yahoo.com/djus/020605/200206051047000419_1.html
now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence and rant
about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how they will go on to
reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigg
