On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 11:28:05 +0200 Petri Helenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| bulk buying international minutes to non-regulated destinations costs
| you less than a consumer pays for interstate call within the US.
On which basis inbound telemarketing calls from ostensibly non-regulated
sources
Has anyone noticed an obvious hole in the new DNC Registry?
Anyone can start sending delete requests to remove another
person's phone number from the list. Since they don't save
anything about the request other than the phone number and
date (see Privacy Policy; they don't collect e-mail or IP
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Oh, joy -- more spam instead of telemarketers.
Joy, actually, since e-mail is not prone to giving unsolicited wake-up
calls to those of us who live graveyard shift.
--vadim
Hi, NANOGers.
] Oh, joy -- more spam instead of telemarketers.
UGH. This of course requires more hosts sending spam, which in turn
raises the value of a compromised host or router.
Thanks,
Rob.
--
Rob Thomas
http://www.cymru.com
ASSERT(coffee != empty);
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tomas Daniska [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
quote
Q: If I register my number on the National Do Not Call Registry, will it stop all
telemarketing calls?
A: No. Placing your number on the National Do Not Call Registry will stop most, but
not all, telemarketing calls.
Q: If I register my number on the National Do Not Call Registry, will it
stop all telemarketing calls?
A: No. Placing your number on the National Do Not Call Registry will
stop most, but not all, telemarketing calls. Some businesses are exempt
from the national registry and still can call you
will not this just be a safe source of working numbers for all those covered by
exceptions?
quote
Q: If I register my number on the National Do Not Call Registry, will it stop all
telemarketing calls?
A: No. Placing your number on the National Do Not Call Registry will stop most, but
*sigh* So why did Richard Callahan even bother soliciting advice the first
place? They are demonstrating they have no concern in operating a decent
mail system, even after many kind folks here provided them all the info they
needed.
I've had two confirmations dropped so far today. Bad in-addr
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Mike Damm
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:06 AM
To save you all some keystrokes...
Donotcall.gov has no MX records. No reverse DNS on any of their outbound
mail boxes. And they obviously are not
Yo Sameer!
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Sameer R. Manek wrote:
Dealing with the bounces would be a nightmare, they've already got their
handsful with the webservers and the outbound mail boxes.
If you can not run a mail server/mail list properly, then you should not
do so. Sounds like donotcall.gov
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Mike Damm wrote:
To save you all some keystrokes...
Donotcall.gov has no MX records. No reverse DNS on any of their outbound
mail boxes. And they obviously are not processing bounces/complaints/etc.
since nothing on that netblock has port 25 open.
And you can bet that
On 27 Jun 2003 at 14:52, Charles Sprickman wrote:
And you can bet that this project cost at least six figures, maybe
seven. As a taxpayer, I was quite disappointed to see IIS and Microsoft
SMTPSVC gluing this pile together. When I went in and registered last
night, I was surprised to see
Businesses that ask for email addresses know that a significant percentage
of people can't type their own email address correctly. Each of those
results in a bounce, or an undeliverable message sitting in an mqueue
somewhere. It would not surprise me if they also reduced their
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nick Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I was thinking more along the line of a bot submitting every possible
10 digit phone number. Do the nation a favor.
Which is, of course, what might happen with email addresses, if someone
made the very bad decision to
This came in from CBS Market Watch:
YAHOO BLOCKS FTC DO-NOT-CALL MAIL
SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- Isn't it ironic. In the war against
unsolicited e-mail, automated Spam blockers are actually getting in the
way as they block legitimate mail from the government. The federal
government on Friday
Noise and Off-topic
Gripes
Subject: Re: National Do Not Call Registry has opened
Thus spake LeBlanc, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's very difficult to make the technology work... Spam blockers are
automated and the software rules are arbitrary, he said.
It's a shame the press are putting the blame
16 matches
Mail list logo
