On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Daniel M. Spielman wrote:
>
> uchicago.edu
>
> At 03:05 PM 3/25/2002 -0600, you wrote:
> >On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:18:23 -0800
> >"Daniel M. Spielman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've had a similar experience with their tech team. I was
> > > being d
uchicago.edu
At 03:05 PM 3/25/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:18:23 -0800
>"Daniel M. Spielman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've had a similar experience with their tech team. I was
> > being dos'd from a college in Chicago so I contacted them to
>
>Mind tel
One person I know that gets hit on his home box with CR and nimda...well, he
goes the extra mile and patches their stuff for them...and leaves a note on
the console. Doesn't SBC own PB now? Why not go through the SBC side
and see what you can shake loose?
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Joe Blanchard wro
Title: RE: PacBell Security/Abuse contact
Pacbell's Abuse/Security Depts are totally useless with regard
to assisting its own customers, let alone defending them.
For the better portion of a few months now, I've
emailed/called many times with regard to CodeRed boxes
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Jon Mansey wrote:
>
> UUnet, excellent responsive abuse team IMHO.
Too bad they don't seem to have a spam abuse department anymore. I've
been complaining about a continuing flood of spam from "jumpjive.com"
(another lying "you-opted-in-to-receive-our-crap" outfit) with noth
> "db" == David Barak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
db> Regarding securiy issues, I'd suggest working with
db> UUNet/Worldcom (or whatever AS701 is called lately).
db> I've seen some of their folks work closely with
db> aggrieved victims of DDOS attacks.
Historically, BBN/Genuity/GTE/Verizon/
good at working with DOS stuff. Email me off list if you are
interested.
-Eric
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Cheung, Rick wrote:
> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:12:02 -0600
> From: "Cheung, Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: PacBell Security/Abuse c
> "db" == David Barak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
db> Regarding securiy issues, I'd suggest working with
db> UUNet/Worldcom (or whatever AS701 is called lately).
db> I've seen some of their folks work closely with
db> aggrieved victims of DDOS attacks.
I was going to say the same thing, bu
I agree.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Mansey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:17 PM
> To: Cheung, Rick
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: PacBell Security/Abuse contact
>
>
>
> UUnet, excellent responsive abuse tea
iginal Message-
> From: Jeremy T. Bouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 2:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: PacBell Security/Abuse contact
>
>
>
> More specifically I belive this is a Distributed Reflection DoS
> like what hit
Title: RE: PacBell Security/Abuse contact
Does anyone have an opinion on a decent ISP out there that's proven to work with the customer during a DDOS storm?
Rick Cheung
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy T. Bouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 2:
More specifically I belive this is a Distributed Reflection DoS
like what hit GRC.COM back on Jan 11th... Basically a flood of SYN
packets to well known ports from IPs which appear to be spoofed. I've
actually been riding it out now for over 2 weeks...
The tech support is complet
At 11:11 PM 3/24/2002 -0800, you wrote:
> Anyone have a telephone number that can reach a live person
>within Pacific Bell's Security/Abuse department? PacBell's technical
>support is completely inept with trying to help their customers when
>under any form of network attack other than p
Jeremy,
We have been a T3 customer of PacBell for 3 years. We have had a few DOS
attacks over the years which required intervention by our backbone providers
which included PacBell.
In every case their policy was to not help. They refered us to their abuse
email address or phone number whic
14 matches
Mail list logo
