On 27 Dec 2004, at 15:02, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
I responded with bzs' direct email addr last week when this was
posted and I receieved a bounce.
- Transcript of session follows -
... while talking to mail.everydns.net.:
RCPT To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 553 http://www.spamhaus.org/query
[ Sorry for the list post, but the mailbox bounces for me ]
I responded with bzs' direct email addr last week when this was
posted and I receieved a bounce.
Regardless, it's all off-topic for NANOG. I think spam-l would
be a good place to carry this on, but as it's been pointed out
over the l
I've responded off-list to the complaint about a customer here and
indicated to the original complainant that if he tries to use nanog as
an amplification device again I'll put him in a filter here and will
urge nanog do the same.
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die| [EMAIL PROTEC
Guys, join SPAM-L and duke it out. nanog is supposed to be networking issues.
Which a runaway spam reporting problem is most likely not.
+-
+ Dave Dennis
+ Seattle, WA
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ http://www.dmdennis.com
+-
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004, Joe Prov
Mike Damm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 13:45:36 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 1. Block [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your access.db
>
> Suggestions on modifying upstream/peers 'access.db' welcome.
>
> Spewing false and libelous abuse complaints is an i
Folllowups elsewhere - this isn't nanog fodder kids.
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 08:56:42PM -0800, David A. Ulevitch wrote:
> There is nobody behind the wheel at The World and they continue
> to send out this odd anti-spam spam.
Wrong and wrong; there are definitely clues at the helm, and it
sur
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 13:45:36 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Block [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your access.db
Suggestions on modifying upstream/peers 'access.db' welcome.
Spewing false and libelous abuse complaints is an issue not easily
remedied by end user filter rules.
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 02:02:54 -0600, Joe Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Some people have sent me emails off-list saying that most people on
> NANOG are not interested in this.
>
OK, whatever.
Do one or both of these if you like -
1. Block [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your access.db
2. Clean u
Some people have sent me emails off-list saying that most people on
NANOG are not interested in this.
I'd like to know why not, and let them know they definitely should be!
I'm doing this on my own time, so there really is no associated cost.
But if I still worked @ FVI.net, it would be a horribl
> I
> have been getting automated scripts from [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
> weeks that have no way to respond, but threaten FVI and Innerwise, and
> report to all their upstreams.
I posted to NANOG about this issue week or so back.[1] There is nobody
behind the wheel at The World and they continue
10 matches
Mail list logo
