RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-29 Thread Joe Shen
I'm sorry I made a mistake the subnet between catalyst4006 and customer's firewall is 10.10.1.213/30, Catalyst4006's interface address is 10.10.1.213, firewall's interface address is 10.10.1.214. Sorry. Joe On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:24 , Tony Rall [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent: On Monday,

RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-29 Thread Pendergrass, Greg
Hi Joe, It would be good to know the type (and software version) of firewall as it could be the firewall and not the switch that's the problem. For instance, there's a known bug with checkpoint and NAT where automatic arp entries disappear. If you can ping it all from the catalyst but not from

Re: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-29 Thread Robert Blayzor
Joe Shen wrote: I'm sorry I made a mistake the subnet between catalyst4006 and customer's firewall is 10.10.1.213/30, Catalyst4006's interface address is 10.10.1.213, firewall's interface address is 10.10.1.214. Have you tried enabling a monitor port on the Cat4k and sniffing what exactly is

RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-29 Thread Scott McGrath
Joe, If you are using NAT 0 you need to have a static translation enabled. Otherwise when the machine first comes up it arp's which creates an xlate entry on the PIX which times out when the inactivity timer runs out. This causes behavior similar to what you are experiencing

RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-28 Thread Erik Amundson
It is possible that this issue is being cause by the customer's firewall as well. Every Ethernet cable has two ends. :) I would check and see if the customer's firewall log says anything. I believe doing a shut/no shut on the Cat 4006 causes the Ethernet link to 'flap' on the port, causing the

Re: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-28 Thread Robert Blayzor
Joe Shen wrote: The customer is allocated a Class C address block 192.168.5/24. And , they connect their network to our network by using a firewall. The Interface on Cata4006 is set up as no switchport, and inter-connecting subnet is configured between Cata4006 and firewall

RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-28 Thread Greg Schwimer
Some things you can look into: firewall interface(10.10.1.122/30). ip route 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.124 Is that the firewall interface is 10.10.1.122, or is it 10.10.1.124? 10.10.1.122 is a host address in the 10.10.1.120/30 subnet. 10.10.1.124 is a /30 network. Either

RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006

2004-06-28 Thread Tony Rall
On Monday, 2004-06-28 at 20:41 MST, Greg Schwimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some things you can look into: firewall interface(10.10.1.122/30). ip route 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.124 Is that the firewall interface is 10.10.1.122, or is it 10.10.1.124? 10.10.1.122 is a host