If its like Montreal.
The cost of electricity is getting high enought that Colo Space is
better spend per rack than on a cage.
I saw Colo literally double the price of big customer (cages) to get
ride of them for rack space.
Philip Lavine wrote:
Can someone tell me if I am out of
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:34:41AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:
>
> Can someone tell me if I am out of luck. I am trying to get a 10x10 cage in
> New Jersey (Jersey City area) but it seems everybody is at capacity. What
> happened?
>
Try VZN/MCI Carteret, down the Turnpike about 8 miles.
--
They claim to be full too, at least from a power perspective. They won't run us more power until the city council aproves them running more power to the building.-jimOn 4/18/06,
Mike Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:34:41AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:>> Can someone te
At 11:06 AM 4/19/2006, jim bartus wrote:
They claim to be full too, at least from a power perspective. They
won't run us more power until the city council aproves them running
more power to the building.
-jim
There are likely to be sub leases available from tenants in existing.
desirable,
On many of the public colo houses earnings calls, they told
analysts that they are trying to keep contracts to one year
so they can raise prices year over year, that power pricing is
fluid and many facilities are being expanded both space and
environmental, that most locations really are full
At 08:11 PM 4/19/2006, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
On many of the public colo houses earnings calls, they told
analysts that they are trying to keep contracts to one year
so they can raise prices year over year, that power pricing is
fluid and many facilities are being expanded both space and
envir
Marty Said...
> At 08:11 PM 4/19/2006, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
>
>
> >>On many of the public colo houses earnings calls, they told
> >>analysts that they are trying to keep contracts to one year
> >>so they can raise prices year over year, that power pricing is
> >>fluid and many facilities are b
At 9:36 PM -0400 4/19/06, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>Remember when folks thought Exodus was crazy for 220w per square foot?
265w/sqft can just handle today's typical blade server power density
(allowing for a reasonable amount of wire management and slightly less
than full blade loading). If you l
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:34:41AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:
>
> Can someone tell me if I am out of luck. I am trying to get a 10x10 cage in
> New Jersey (Jersey City area) but it seems everybody is at capacity. What
> happened?
My guess (this being NJ) is an aftereffect of the 9/11/2001 d
At 06:51 AM 4/21/2006, you wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:34:41AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:
>
> Can someone tell me if I am out of luck. I am trying to get a
10x10 cage in New Jersey (Jersey City area) but it seems everybody
is at capacity. What happened?
My guess (this being NJ) is an
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:34:41AM -0700, Philip Lavine wrote:
Can someone tell me if I am out of luck. I am trying to get a 10x10 cage in New Jersey (Jersey City area) but it seems everybody is at capacity. What happened?
My guess (this being NJ) is an aftereffect of t
> Five years after 9/11 you would think that people would have located
> business continuity ops much further away (assuming the businesses are
> based in NYC) than NJ.
The financial industry has to have their NY backups
somewhere else in the NY area because they generally
require proximity to
> Five years after 9/11 you would think that people would have located
> business continuity ops much further away (assuming the businesses are
[..]
> Disclaimer: I work for someone who provides outsourcing services
> including the area of business continuity.
I suggest you talk to some of the fo
Lincoln Dale wrote:
I suggest you talk to some of the folks you work with that have to deal with
synchronous replication.
In the world of storage networking & synchronous I/O, typically anything
higher than 1 msec round-trip latency is too high.
True, but 2ms latency in syncing a backup syst
> Lincoln Dale wrote:
> >
> > I suggest you talk to some of the folks you work with that have to deal
> with
> > synchronous replication.
> >
> > In the world of storage networking & synchronous I/O, typically anything
> > higher than 1 msec round-trip latency is too high.
>
> True, but 2ms laten
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:43:47 EDT, Jim Popovitch said:
> all know what the next big threats are (nuclear and/or biological), is
> it worth the risk that the next (and there will be) event is small
> enough not to affect an area 65 miles across?
If I was a Manhattan based company, and an event too
> True, but 2ms latency in syncing a backup system is much better than 1
> month complete loss of service due to *poor* continuity planning. We
> all know what the next big threats are (nuclear and/or biological), is
> it worth the risk that the next (and there will be) event is small
> enoug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You have to take a balanced approach to continuity planning.
> Otherwise, you risk going bankrupt long before there is
> any big catastrophe.
>
> Also, I would say that expecting a terror act to knock
> out a 65 square mile area is being a bit over pessimistic.
> Pessi
> > Also, I would say that expecting a terror act to knock
> > out a 65 square mile area is being a bit over pessimistic.
> If any of you have not done so, I would highly recommend reading Bruce
> Schneier's book 'Beyond Fear'. The particular scenario that is being
> described here is what he woul
On 4/21/06, Jim Popovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Five years after 9/11 you would think that people would have locatedbusiness continuity ops much further away (assuming the businesses arebased in NYC) than NJ. I'm sure that regulations require them to be x
miles or in another state. But all t
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:17:51 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have to take a balanced approach to continuity planning.
Otherwise, you risk going bankrupt long before there is
any big catastrophe.
"risk analysis"
Also, I would say that expecting a terror act to knock
out a 65 square m
LD> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:43:51 +1000
LD> From: Lincoln Dale
LD> I suggest you talk to some of the folks you work with that have to
LD> deal with synchronous replication.
LD>
LD> In the world of storage networking & synchronous I/O, typically
LD> anything higher than 1 msec round-trip latenc
22 matches
Mail list logo
