From: "Michael Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 9:10 AM
Subject: RE: Open-Source Network Management Tools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I'm looking for open-source alternatives for network man
Claydon, Tom wrote:
I'm looking for open-source alternatives for network management, such as
Nagios or Big Brother. We are currently using WhatsUp Gold, and would
like to move to something more flexible (and not running on a Windows
platform). Something that has email/paging capabilities, and can p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I'm looking for open-source alternatives for network management,
> such as Nagios or Big Brother. We are currently using WhatsUp Gold,
> and would like to move to something more flexible (and not running
> on a Windows platform). Something that ha
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:02:33 +0930, Mark Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Yet one more new tool "Net-Policy" undergoing a lot of development.
It's designed to allow for any protocol to be used for data, but is
currently concentrating on SNMP (for collection, distribution and
events). It's
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 12:16:15AM -0700, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
> In reality, to get best results, use some combination of few such systems.
> All have string sides and weak sides.
> (For example, snmpstat shows excellent network view, allowing to see exactly
> what is going on, and shows goo
om: "Lucas Iglesias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Claydon, Tom'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 1:09 PM
Subject: RE: Open-Source Network Management Tools
>
> We have been using JFFNMS (http://www.jffnms.org
]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: Open-Source Network Management Tools
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 02:47:45PM -0500, Claydon, Tom wrote:
> > I'm looking for open-source alternatives for network management, such as
> > Nagios or Big Brother. We are cur
Subject: Re: Open-Source Network Management Tools
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 07:54:54PM -0700, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> > Well I hope that we will be coming with (nexb) will not be
> sucking, but
> > it is not production grade yet.
> > Will have to wa
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 07:54:54PM -0700, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> Well I hope that we will be coming with (nexb) will not be sucking, but
> it is not production grade yet.
> Will have to wait a few more months.
Ah yes, I'm looking forward to seeing that. :) Need beta testers?
> > I'm looki
> There's a few other packages out there, but IMHO they all suck in one
> way or another.
Well I hope that we will be coming with (nexb) will not be sucking, but
it is not production grade yet.
Will have to wait a few more months.
> I'm looking for open-source alternatives for network
> manageme
email/paging capabilities.
Try it out and let me know.
Luckas.-
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de
Claydon, Tom
Enviado el: Martes, 14 de Septiembre de 2004 04:48 p.m.
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Open-Source Network Management Tools
I'm l
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 02:47:45PM -0500, Claydon, Tom wrote:
> I'm looking for open-source alternatives for network management, such as
> Nagios or Big Brother. We are currently using WhatsUp Gold, and would
> like to move to something more flexible (and not running on a Windows
> platform). Some
I'm looking for open-source alternatives for network management, such as
Nagios or Big Brother. We are currently using WhatsUp Gold, and would
like to move to something more flexible (and not running on a Windows
platform). Something that has email/paging capabilities, and can process
SNMP traps w
Hi there,
I'm curious to know what tools (in traffic engineering arena) people use
in order to manage and verify their service assurance that they are
providing and / or receiving they think they are.
How do you know the policers are functioning correctly?
How do you know whether your se
> Thanks for the suggestions. The network ferret tools reports to
> do layer 2 discovery as well, maybe not so wishful thinking but
> I could be wrong -
>
> http://www.panix.com/~logikos/
Thanks for the pointer. HPOV claims their layer 2 discovery is independent
of ven
Thanks for the suggestions. The network ferret tools reports to do layer 2 discovery
as well, maybe not so wishful thinking but I could be wrong -
http://www.panix.com/~logikos/
- Original Message -
From: Mark Boolootian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, May 6, 2004 11
Sean,
The one I downloaded, tried and then bought was solarwinds. They have a
demo copy that you can get the magic key to. If gives as much SNMP as
the router operators allow.
One feature that is nice is give it the "base" router and it will
discover everything attached to it.
John Lee
http://
> The best GPL tool that I've come across in a long while, as far as
> network discovery goes, would have to be the discovery engine inside
> Netdisco (http://www.netdisco.org). This tool is fairly Cisco-centric,
> but Max has put a lot of work into a tool for folks who are tired of
> CiscoW
s not working.
-B
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Network discovery tools
I was wondering if anyone could recommend a good shareware or demo network disc
I was wondering if anyone could recommend a good shareware or demo network discovery
tool. I was hoping to find something that will show vendor type during node
discovery. I came across a tool called network ferret that did the job, but nothing
downloadable.
I'm hoping to do some more work
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Henry Linneweh wrote:
>
> I miss this essential toolset now that I do not have it
Try RIPE NCC's RIS project: www.ripe.net/ris, same data, similar tools.
Henk
--
Henk
I miss this essential toolset now that I do not have
it
-Henry
http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-April/020458.html
The full original paper is at
http://www.osvdb.org/4030
---Mike
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Com
> Indeed, an ideal management framework would include:
0. a system to generate all pieces of network configuration
from high-level descriptions and enterprise data such as
dns, ip addr assignments, ...
at least those parts of configuration which are not
created dynamically by self-co
> I like RCS better than RANCID for config change tracking, although an
> ideal system would probably involve both.
Indeed, an ideal management framework would include:
1. A tool in which to record the desired (past, current, future) state
of network devices. Bonus points for having a differe
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:06:19AM -0800, Steve Francis wrote:
> What do people use for knowledgebases?
I'll second the suggestion for an informal wiki; simple, zero-policy, and
allows people to cross-reference information in a far richer manner than
you can get out of most "knowledge base" appli
> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:52:15 -0800 (PST)
> From: Steve Gibbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Steve Francis wrote:
>
> > I'm looking for a better (preferably open source) way to track change
> > plans, event resolutions, etc.
> >
> > e.g. an easy
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Steve Francis wrote:
> I'm looking for a better (preferably open source) way to track change
> plans, event resolutions, etc.
>
> e.g. an easy way to dig up what the changes that occured on a system
> were for, who did them, etc.
> Obviously rancid et al shows us what changed
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 10:06:19AM -0800, Steve Francis wrote:
>
> e.g. an easy way to dig up what the changes that occured on a system
> were for, who did them, etc.
> Obviously rancid et al shows us what changed when, but not the change
> plan that was responsbile or what problem it solved.
What do people use for knowledgebases?
I'm looking for a better (preferably open source) way to track change
plans, event resolutions, etc.
e.g. an easy way to dig up what the changes that occured on a system
were for, who did them, etc.
Obviously rancid et al shows us what changed when, but no
e file on your web server. Akamai really sucks
for predicting where downloads will be sourced.
On a more practical subject does anyone know of any useful cleaning tools
for last months windows worms besides the "free" tools from the anti-virus
vendors? Are there any freeware tools? Or any AV
It appears someone started a DDoS (~ 500 hosts involved) attack against a
customer IP in our network this morning at 6am EDT (~ 250Mb/s coming in on
3 links). None of the IP addresses are spoofed as there is a fixed set of
about 500 hundred and all are coming in via paths that make sense from
Good afternoon,
I was wondering what kind network trend and analysis tools people
use out there to try and get a handle on overal network health?
(bandwidth, etc.) Feel free to contact me off list if you like?
Thanks,
Dave Olverson
On maandag, maa 3, 2003, at 18:41 Europe/Amsterdam,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what is not functioning properly?
Determining who is authorized to announce a certain block of IP
address
space.
no protocol is going to help with this problem. its a
social engineering issue, not a t
> On maandag, maa 3, 2003, at 17:30 Europe/Amsterdam,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> So not functioning properly is preferable to depending on a tempting
> >> target for proper functioning?
>
> > what is not functioning properly?
>
> Determining who is authorized to announce a certain b
On maandag, maa 3, 2003, at 17:30 Europe/Amsterdam,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So not functioning properly is preferable to depending on a tempting
target for proper functioning?
what is not functioning properly?
Determining who is authorized to announce a certain block of IP address
space.
>
> On maandag, maa 3, 2003, at 16:44 Europe/Amsterdam,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > tool in the generic sense. too many things that depend on
> > LDAP for proper functioning -will- make LDAP a tempting
> > target.
>
> So not functioning properly is preferable to depending on a
be used by many tools to
communicate in the same way that many servers (BIND, NSD, DJBDNS, MS-DNS,
QuickDNS) can use the DNS protocol to communicate with countless clients
(Netscape, sendmail, ...).
tool in the generic sense. too many things that depend on
LDAP for proper functioning -will- m
On maandag, maa 3, 2003, at 16:44 Europe/Amsterdam,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tool in the generic sense. too many things that depend on
LDAP for proper functioning -will- make LDAP a tempting
target.
So not functioning properly is preferable to depending on a tempting
targ
>
>
> > Too many features layered on a single tool. Haq the tool
> > and the dependencies will cripple your service offering.
>
> LDAP is not a tool, it is a protocol that can be used by many tools to
> communicate in the same way that many servers (BIND, NSD, DJBDN
D]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: free network monitoring/management tools
>
>
>
> hello to all,
>
> i would appreciate your your knowledge and experiences regarding freely
> available tools for network monitoring an
g-0210/ppt/stephen.pdf
-Wayne
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: free network monitoring/management tools
hello to all,
i would appreciate your your knowledge and experiences regarding freely
hello to all,
i would appreciate your your knowledge and experiences regarding freely
available tools for network monitoring and management (all cisco now, some
other stuff later). i would prefer free tools as i have no budget :)
i am looking for the following (it will be running on either
>
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> > How about an operations oriented question. What is the current
> > preferences amoung network operators for network inventory and
> > configuration management tools? Not so much status monitoring (up,
> &
On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Sean Donelan wrote:
> How about an operations oriented question. What is the current
> preferences amoung network operators for network inventory and
> configuration management tools? Not so much status monitoring (up,
> down) but other stuff network operator w
### On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 18:37:07 -0400 (EDT), jeffrey arnold
### <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> casually decided to expound upon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
### the following thoughts about "Re: What's wrong with provisioning
### tools?":
ja> On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Stephen Griffin
o
time I've thought about adding it to the COSI-NMS project on Sourceforge,
but never gotten around to it. I've also other similar tools outside of
Sourceforce, such as Pancho (http://pancho.lunarmedia.net/).
I wrote the code behind mine to be fairly modular, so that adding a module
to bac
rsday, June 13, 2002 10:37 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: What's wrong with provisioning tools?
> >
> > i was more interested in something emulating a vt100 that one
> > could eventually plug to a console port and chat with the box...
>
>
Title: RE: What's wrong with provisioning tools?
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniska Tomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: What's wrong with provisioning tools?
>
> i w
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 13. júna 2002 16:29
> To: Daniska Tomas
> Subject: RE: What's wrong with provisioning tools?
>
>
> I have a client HTTP://www.CORRS.ORG using several
> speech-synthesis terminals,
> they even have a brail printer on the network
by a fast-acting fuse will protect the fuse by blowing
first.
-Original Message-From: Mathew Lodge
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12. júna 2002 23:25To:
David Daley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: What's wrong with
provisioning tools?David,Almost all of what
y
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Stephen Griffin wrote:
:: I would be really surprised if anything other than mom-and-pop shops
:: didn't have _at least_ this.
::
:: rtrmon or rancid can do great config archiving and provide difference
:: output.
::
I don't think the issue is detecting change as much as it
In the referenced message, David Daley said:
> 4) There isn't anything to track non sanctioned changes to the network
> (i.e.: hacker induced re-configurations)
I would be really surprised if anything other than mom-and-pop shops
didn't have _at least_ this.
rtrmon or rancid can do great confi
David,
Almost all of what you're talking about is network device configuration
file management -- there are several solutions out there today that do
this. The rest is template-based configuration provisioning tools, which
typically have no operational model of the network -- so it should
Bill Woodcock wrote:
David Daley wrote:
:> I would very much like to hear about "specific" needs for
:> (provisioning) tools that would satisfy your needs
:
:
: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ops-operator-req-mgmt-02.txt
I can't help but laugh at thi
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, David Daley wrote:
> I would very much like to hear about "specific" needs for (provisioning)
> tools that would satisfy your needs
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ops-operator-req-mgmt-02.txt
-Bill
Title: Message
A couple of times
during NANOG25, from the floor and from the podium, it was identified
that the tools available for managing networks were garbage. I was surprised to
hear that even real basics, such as change control and configuration
management, weren't widely ad
in the version fool you. It's not just beta quality.
Gerald
P.S. Long time listener first time poster.
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Pawlukiewicz Jane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new here but I already have a quick question.
>
> What are the best diagnostic tools available to network
JP> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 13:42:41 -0400
JP> From: Pawlukiewicz Jane
JP> Why do you think I joined this group? very smart man.
In all seriousness, one has the basics like traceroute, ping,
route servers, looking glasses, et cetera. However, those tools
only give a view from a cert
Why do you think I joined this group? very smart man.
Jane
"E.B. Dreger" wrote:
>
> PJ> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 09:50:48 -0400
> PJ> From: Pawlukiewicz Jane
>
> PJ> What are the best diagnostic tools available to network
> PJ> operators today?
>
>
PJ> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 09:50:48 -0400
PJ> From: Pawlukiewicz Jane
PJ> What are the best diagnostic tools available to network
PJ> operators today?
NANOG posts. ;-)
--
Eddy
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inte
Jane Pawlukiewicz wrote:
> Ping and traceroute give me a ton of data. I was thinking of something
> that takes that data and turns it into the bottom line. Where is the
> problem, when did it start, all the good stuff.
I think that's called Sean Donelan. :-)
To give you a ser
> - Original Message -
> From: "Pawlukiewicz Jane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Marc Pierrat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Diagnostic Tools
>
>
>> No. Bu
I use something call netscan tools 2002. It may or may not be what your
looking for.
netscantools.com
-Eric
- Original Message -
From: "Pawlukiewicz Jane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Marc Pierrat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursd
ey're on every
>platform, even windows.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Pawlukiewicz Jane
> > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 12:39 PM
> > To: Nicolas Maton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
****
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pawlukiewicz Jane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: donderdag 6 juni 2002 16:01
> To: Nicolas Maton
> Subject: Re: Diagnostic Tools
>
> Thanks for responding so quickly.
>
&g
Well, i dunno about everyone else, but i start screaming when my ICQ flower
turns orange and starts spinning.
- Original Message -
From: "Pawlukiewicz Jane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:50 AM
Subject: Diagnostic Tool
Hi,
I'm new here but I already have a quick question.
What are the best diagnostic tools available to network operators today?
Thanks for any info,
Jane
begin:vcard
n:Pawlukiewicz;Jane
tel;cell:703 517-2591
tel;fax:703 289-5814
tel;work:703 289-5307
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Booz
Would anyone using Riversoft to monitor a large scale IP network mind
sharing operational experiences?
Please reply off list. If anyone else would care for the same
information, I'd be happy to send (off list) a summary of any responses.
Thanks!
Austin
### On Tue, 5 Mar 2002 15:35:59 -0800, "H. Michael Smith, Jr."
### <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> casually decided to expound upon
### <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> the following thoughts about "Tools used
### accounting/billing":
HMS> Can anyone suggest tools to use for g
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, H. Michael Smith, Jr. wrote:
> Hello All.
>
> Can anyone suggest tools to use for gathering statistics for billing
> purposes? I would like to know what tools are most common among ISPs.
I maintain a list of free/OpenSourcish tools at:
http://inet-ops.stea
Hello All.
Can anyone suggest tools to use for gathering statistics for billing
purposes? I would like to know what tools are most common among ISPs.
Thanks,
Michael
<>
101 - 172 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
