[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the future of e-mail, if something better at spam suppression
doesn't come along.
Pace en requiat email
Please! Spare us the fractured Latin.
Mea maxima culpa.
Requiescat in pace - May he/it rest in peace.
Thank you. I don't speak Latin (he says redundantly) b
--On 09 March 2004 11:25 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Requiescas in pace o email
ITYM Requiescas in pace o elitterae
Alex
>> This is the future of e-mail, if something better at spam suppression
>> doesn't come along.
>Pace en requiat email
Please! Spare us the fractured Latin.
Requiescat in pace - May he/it rest in peace.
Requiescat - 3rd person singular subjunctive of "requiescere"
in - same as English preposi
Only because I was up checking on a remote problem...
> This is the future of e-mail, if something better at spam suppression
> doesn't come along.
Like the Delete function? what's NOT better than easily duped validation
mechanisms? Perhaps the only reason spammers haven't bothered is becau
James
Blueyonder is the ISP part of a Cable TV company over here in the UK.
Looks like the are playing with various 'annoying' (IMHO) anti-spam
technologies. Personnally I've looked at this technique at a request of
one of users who thought it might be a better idea than the Spamassassin
syste
> This is the future of e-mail, if something better at spam suppression
> doesn't come along.
Cool, even more email sent to my mailbox that has nothing to do with anything
I've sent or requested (get these as a result of email address spoofing viruses
too)
Steve
>
> ** Reply to message from
Jeff Shultz [3/9/2004 2:54 AM] :
This is the future of e-mail, if something better at spam suppression
doesn't come along.
You are joking, right?
Clueless users and bad software have been a feature of email (or
anything else on the internet) since quite some time.
--
srs (postmaster|suresh)@o
Jeff Shultz wrote:
This is the future of e-mail, if something better at spam suppression
doesn't come along.
Pace en requiat email
:
: What is this.. I've had lots and lots from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whoever he is?!
Not sure, but I got 4 of them, and it took 12 hours from my only post over
the weekend to get them. Since I cannot get mail to @@blueyonder since I
will not play this little game I hope he sees this and realizes
This is the future of e-mail, if something better at spam suppression
doesn't come along.
** Reply to message from "Stephen J. Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:08:10 + (GMT)
> What is this.. I've had lots and lots from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whoever he is?!
>
> On Mon, 8 Mar 20
What is this.. I've had lots and lots from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whoever he is?!
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, James Edwards wrote:
>
> NO !
>
> On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 05:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ATTENTION!
> > A message you recently sent to a 0Spam.com user with the subject "Re: Source
> > address
NO !
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 05:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ATTENTION!
> A message you recently sent to a 0Spam.com user with the subject "Re: Source address
> validation (was Re: UUNet Offer..." was not delivered because they are using the
> 0Spam.com anti-spam service. Please click the link
12 matches
Mail list logo
