> The current pretense of "privacy" is nothing more than a convenient
> mechanism for registrars to pad their wallets and evade responsible
> for facilitating abuse.
As an aside, I used a (wicked big) competitor's "privacy" service to
regsiter a domain for a political worker who wanted to whistle
> Because there is no data protection on many databases (such as ".com"
> registrars who are forced to sell the data if requested), people lie
> when registering, because it is the only tool they have to protect
> their privacy.
Yup. Our ICANN contracts both require us to sell bulk registrant dat
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:35:23 PST, Owen DeLong said:
> >> Requesting rDNS means "I don't want to receive email from Africa".
> >
> > Having an rDNS entry for a host doesn't mean you know if it is/isn't in
> > Africa, to any higher degree of certainty than when you just had the IP
> > address.
>
>
Requesting rDNS means "I don't want to receive email from Africa".
Having an rDNS entry for a host doesn't mean you know if it is/isn't in
Africa, to any higher degree of certainty than when you just had the IP
address.
What he was pointing out her is that a majority of African ISPs do not even
hav
on Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:21:04PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:59:43AM -0500,
> Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> a message of 98 lines which said:
>
> > 1) any legitimate mail source MUST have valid, functioning,
> > non-generic rDNS indicating
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:21:04 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer said:
> American bias but remember the Internet is worldwide. I do not know
> how it is in the USA but there are many parts of the world where ISP
> do not have a delegation of in-addr.arpa and therefore cannot pass it
> to their customers. (
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:26:47PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > 4) all domains with invalid whois data MUST be deactivated (not
> > confiscated, just temporarily removed from the root dbs) immediately
> > and their owners contacted.
>
> Because there is no data protection on many databas
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:59:43AM -0500,
Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 98 lines which said:
> 4) all domains with invalid whois data MUST be deactivated (not
> confiscated, just temporarily removed from the root dbs) immediately
> and their owners contacted.
Because
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:59:43AM -0500,
Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 98 lines which said:
> 1) any legitimate mail source MUST have valid, functioning,
> non-generic rDNS indicating that it is a mail server or
> source. (Most do, many do not. There is NO reason why
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:59:43AM -0500,
Steven Champeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 98 lines which said:
> 0) for the love of God, Montresor, just block port 25 outbound
> already.
If there is no escape / exemption (as proposed by William Leibzon),
then, as a consumer, I scream "
10 matches
Mail list logo