Because there is no data protection on many databases (such as .com
registrars who are forced to sell the data if requested), people lie
when registering, because it is the only tool they have to protect
their privacy.
Yup. Our ICANN contracts both require us to sell bulk registrant data,
The current pretense of privacy is nothing more than a convenient
mechanism for registrars to pad their wallets and evade responsible
for facilitating abuse.
As an aside, I used a (wicked big) competitor's privacy service to
regsiter a domain for a political worker who wanted to whistleblow
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:59:43AM -0500,
Steven Champeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 98 lines which said:
0) for the love of God, Montresor, just block port 25 outbound
already.
If there is no escape / exemption (as proposed by William Leibzon),
then, as a consumer, I scream OVER
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:59:43AM -0500,
Steven Champeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 98 lines which said:
1) any legitimate mail source MUST have valid, functioning,
non-generic rDNS indicating that it is a mail server or
source. (Most do, many do not. There is NO reason why
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:59:43AM -0500,
Steven Champeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 98 lines which said:
4) all domains with invalid whois data MUST be deactivated (not
confiscated, just temporarily removed from the root dbs) immediately
and their owners contacted.
Because
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:26:47PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
4) all domains with invalid whois data MUST be deactivated (not
confiscated, just temporarily removed from the root dbs) immediately
and their owners contacted.
Because there is no data protection on many databases
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:21:04 +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer said:
American bias but remember the Internet is worldwide. I do not know
how it is in the USA but there are many parts of the world where ISP
do not have a delegation of in-addr.arpa and therefore cannot pass it
to their customers. (It
on Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 12:21:04PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:59:43AM -0500,
Steven Champeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 98 lines which said:
1) any legitimate mail source MUST have valid, functioning,
non-generic rDNS indicating that it is
Requesting rDNS means I don't want to receive email from Africa.
Having an rDNS entry for a host doesn't mean you know if it is/isn't in
Africa, to any higher degree of certainty than when you just had the IP
address.
What he was pointing out her is that a majority of African ISPs do not even
have
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:35:23 PST, Owen DeLong said:
Requesting rDNS means I don't want to receive email from Africa.
Having an rDNS entry for a host doesn't mean you know if it is/isn't in
Africa, to any higher degree of certainty than when you just had the IP
address.
What he was
10 matches
Mail list logo
