Thank you Michael,
for throwing light into this.
Yes, I see, Sabri and me are on two different rails, one leading north,
the other one leading east. I hope Sabri still has got all his hairs.
I am counting mine now.
Kind regards and thank you again,
Peter Dambier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:06:35PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Michael,
> This is a good example of a useless argument caused when one
> person is speaking from a customer viewpoint and one customer
> is speaking from an operator viewpoint.
Last time I checked, the O in [EU|NA|AFRI]NOG
> > I know of one host here in germany who can see h.root-servers.net.
> > That host is living in a KPN data centre directly connected to
Amterdam
> > IX.
>
> Your own traceroute clearly shows that your host is not directly
> connected to the AMS-IX. Nor does the KPN datacenter it resides in. Th
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 02:40:14PM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote:
> Sabri Berisha wrote:
Dear Peter,
> > Peter Dambier did post nonsense. In fact, it was total nonsense since
> > the AMS-IX is not present in any KPN datacentre, *and* it is impossible
> > for end-hosts to connect to the AMS-IX direc
Sabri Berisha wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 04:07:03PM -0500, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
Peter Dambier did post nonsense. In fact, it was total nonsense since
the AMS-IX is not present in any KPN datacentre, *and* it is impossible
for end-hosts to connect to the AMS-IX directly.
Part o
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:59:15AM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote:
I means, here in germany we cannot see h.root-servers.net
Here is my traceroute to h.root-servers.net right now:
So, where do you see a problem related
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 04:07:03PM -0500, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
Dear John,
> No, why don't you stop insulting people, Niels. You attack Peter because
> of his involvment in the Inclusive Namespace. FYI: Public root servers
> are online and available. Maybe the h-root ops should ask the
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:59:15AM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote:
> > I means, here in germany we cannot see h.root-servers.net
>
> > Here is my traceroute to h.root-servers.net right now:
>
> So, where do you see a problem related to L3/Cogent there? Your
On Sun, 23 October 2005 16:07:03 -0500, John Palmer (NANOG Acct) wrote:
> No, why don't you stop insulting people, Niels. You attack Peter because
> of his involvment in the Inclusive Namespace. FYI:
John,
I disagree. A person lacking the clues so badly and wildly
guessing (and posting it) is da
h-root-servers.net works now,
even from dtag.de
It was not about level 3.
It was a firewall.
Kind regards
Peter and Karin Dambier
--
Peter and Karin Dambier
Public-Root
Graeffstrasse 14
D-64646 Heppenheim
+49-6252-671788 (Telekom)
+49-179-108-3978 (O2 Genion)
+49-6252-750308 (VoIP: sipgate.de
rs up.
- Original Message -
From: "Niels Bakker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Dambier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2005 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: h-root-servers.net
>
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Dambier) [Sun 23 Oct 2005, 22:34 CEST]:
> &
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Dambier) [Sun 23 Oct 2005, 22:34 CEST]:
I know of one host here in germany who can see h.root-servers.net. That
host is living in a KPN data centre directly connected to Amterdam IX.
Peter, please stop posting nonsense.
-- Niels.
Daniel Roesen wrote:
He talked about "here in germany". "germany" is a nonexistant entity
in BGP and global routing. You cannot talk about observation of
connectivity problems with location specification in terms of
"countries".
Hi Daniel,
I thought it might make more sense telling where I
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 08:00:10PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:59:15AM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote:
> >> I means, here in germany we cannot see h.root-servers.net
> >
> > Nonsense. There is nothing like "geopolitical routing".
>
> I wouldn't call it "geopolitical ro
* Daniel Roesen:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:59:15AM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote:
>> I means, here in germany we cannot see h.root-servers.net
>
> Nonsense. There is nothing like "geopolitical routing".
I wouldn't call it "geopolitical routing", "routing according to local
policy" is more approp
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 11:59:15AM +0200, Peter Dambier wrote:
> I means, here in germany we cannot see h.root-servers.net
Nonsense. There is nothing like "geopolitical routing".
> Ok, it is only one of the root servers. But have a look who
> h.root-servers.net is. It is one of the originals not
323.133 ms * 325.671 ms
13 so12-0-0-0.arlapg.dren.net (138.18.1.3) 373.705 ms 381.351 ms 393.036
ms
14 * * *
; <<>> DiG 9.1.3 <<>> . @h.root-servers.net
;; global options: printcmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
A friend of mine has got a
17 matches
Mail list logo
