SW> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 15:56:53 +
SW> From: Stephen Wilcox
SW> you can override it (on cisco) with allow-own-as
s/allow-own-as/allowas-in/
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-c
Philip Lavine wrote:
To all,
Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am advertising a rte 1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my location in NJ. At my other location in CA where I am advertising another rte 2.2.2.2 via BGP to the Internet via the same ISP_A. I am us
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 06:44:11AM -0800, Philip Lavine wrote:
>
> To all,
>
> Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am advertising a
> rte 1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my location in NJ. At my
> other location in CA where I am advertising another rte 2.2.
On Nov 17, 2006, at 9:57 AM, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am
advertising a rte 1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my
location in NJ. At my other location in CA where I am advertising
another rte 2.2.2.2 via BGP to the Internet vi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philip Lavine wrote:
> To all,
>
> Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am advertising a
> rte 1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my location in NJ. At my
> other location in CA where I am advertising another rte 2.
To all,
Probabaly the the latter; however here is the situation. I am advertising a rte
1.1.1.1 via BGP to the Internet via ISP_A via my location in NJ. At my other
location in CA where I am advertising another rte 2.2.2.2 via BGP to the
Internet via the same ISP_A. I am using the same AS for
