>Why don't you just put your DNS servers in some other TLD and forget
>about the problems of adding glue records to .net/.com? The name
>of your DNS server can't really be that important.
Because it would mean changing the nameservers for $stupid amounts of customer
domains
for which we are
Network Solutions appears to have some level of support for RRs
because I am aware of domain names registered through them that have
RRs.
it is pushing glue to the parent zone, com et alia, that is the
problem.
Why don't you just put your DNS servers in some other TLD and forget
Bjørn Mork wrote:
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Network Solutions appears to have some level of support for RRs
because I am aware of domain names registered through them that have
RRs.
it is pushing glue to the parent zone, com et alia, that is the
problem.
Why don't
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Network Solutions appears to have some level of support for RRs
>> because I am aware of domain names registered through them that have
>> RRs.
>
> it is pushing glue to the parent zone, com et alia, that is the
> problem.
Why don't you ju
Network Solutions appears to have some level of support for RRs
because I am aware of domain names registered through them that have
RRs.
it is pushing glue to the parent zone, com et alia, that is the
problem.
randy
On Jan 24, 2008 10:55 AM, Matt Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> > >o netsol understands glue
> >
> > REGISTRY part of NetSol here, I think David means the REGISTRAR part no?
>
> To my knowledge, there is no registry part of Network Solut
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> >o netsol understands glue
>
> REGISTRY part of NetSol here, I think David means the REGISTRAR part no?
To my knowledge, there is no registry part of Network Solutions.
Network Solutions and VeriSign are two distinct companies with
distin
: Thu 1/24/2008 00:42
To: Jeroen Massar
Cc: David Freedman; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: NetworkSolutions - Was: Re: v6 gluelessness
> And what if NetSol is your registrar that needs to add the glue!?
it hurts when i hit my head with a hammer
then stop hitting your head with a hammer
time to c
In a message written on Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 08:15:41AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> >>ugly ugly ugly. tucows, wake up and smell the coffee!
> >yes... :( also Joker, and everyone else :(
>
> how do we move this forward across the board? this is going to be a
> serious impediment.
It's a pitty IC
To: Jeroen Massar
Cc: David Freedman; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: NetworkSolutions - Was: Re: v6 gluelessness
> And what if NetSol is your registrar that needs to add the glue!?
it hurts when i hit my head with a hammer
then stop hitting your head with a hammer
time to collect a list
And what if NetSol is your registrar that needs to add the glue!?
it hurts when i hit my head with a hammer
then stop hitting your head with a hammer
time to collect a list of registrars who do this well and easily.
randy
Randy Bush wrote:
David Freedman wrote:
Will somebody please, please PLEASE let me know what magic process for
networksolutions are to get glue added, am on the 72nd hour of
the phone game where questions are bouncing between:
as far as i have been able to sort this
o netsol unders
o netsol understands glue
REGISTRY part of NetSol here, I think David means the REGISTRAR part no?
wow! people actually pay those prices?
ugly ugly ugly. tucows, wake up and smell the coffee!
yes... :( also Joker, and everyone else :(
how do we move this forward across the board?
On Jan 23, 2008 2:08 PM, Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David Freedman wrote:
> >
> > Will somebody please, please PLEASE let me know what magic process for
> > networksolutions are to get glue added, am on the 72nd hour of the
> > phone game where questions are bouncing between:
>
David Freedman wrote:
Will somebody please, please PLEASE let me know what magic process for
networksolutions are to get glue added, am on the 72nd hour of the
phone game where questions are bouncing between:
as far as i have been able to sort this
o netsol understands glue
Will somebody please, please PLEASE let me know what magic process for
networksolutions are to get glue added, am on the 72nd hour of the
phone game where questions are bouncing between:
- What is a glue record?
and
- What is an record?
$ dig +norec @a.gtld-servers.net. dot
On 18-Jan-2008, at 18:56, Randy Bush wrote:
The .com/.net registry has supported RRs for over five years
(since May, 2002). The issue you may be encountering is that not
every .com/.net registrar supports them.
way cool.
do you happen to know if opensrs registrars have a path to do so
The .com/.net registry has supported RRs for over five years
(since May, 2002). The issue you may be encountering is that not
every .com/.net registrar supports them.
way cool.
do you happen to know if opensrs registrars have a path to do so?
randy
Randy,
On Jan 18, 2008, at 12:54 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
i finally sent off an email, but have no response, yet.
Should have gotten a response by now. If not, let me know.
i have hope, as the team there now is pretty good. it's probably
just my lack of talent at navigating that much layer
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Randy Bush wrote:
> >I don't know what the process is for getting IPv6 addresses associated
> >with host records in the VGRS COM/NET registry, but it seems like good
> >information to share here if you find a definitive answer.
>
> i will. i am trying to document ops proce
send url.
get: http://www.iana.org/cctld/cctld-template.txt
yay! that form still exists! thank you! i have had a whack at it and
sent it in. wish me luck.
what i need is the talent to find such things. thanks!
i have this trembling fear that they will have some process where
everyon
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Randy Bush wrote:
It's the same process that is used to update a delegation in the root zone.
For ccTLDs I believe there's some kind of web portal to allow such changes
to be requested, but my experience is that the old text form also still
works just fine.
i actually
It's the same process that is used to update a delegation in the root
zone. For ccTLDs I believe there's some kind of web portal to allow such
changes to be requested, but my experience is that the old text form
also still works just fine.
i actually spent 20 minutes on the iana web site. a
On 18-Jan-2008, at 05:39, Randy Bush wrote:
similarly for the root, as rip.psg.com serves some tlds.
The request has to come from a TLD manager (anyone which uses
rip.psg.com)
i can go down the hall to the mirror and ask myself to ask me to do
it. :)
:-)
but, of course, you would get
similarly for the root, as rip.psg.com serves some tlds.
The request has to come from a TLD manager (anyone which uses
rip.psg.com)
i can go down the hall to the mirror and ask myself to ask me to do it. :)
> but, of course, you would get a more authoritative reply
from IANA.
i am hoping
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 03:51:26PM +0900,
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 10 lines which said:
> similarly for the root, as rip.psg.com serves some tlds.
The request has to come from a TLD manager (anyone which uses
rip.psg.com) but, of course, you would get a more authorita
Randy Bush wrote:
for those of us who are trying to provide dual stack services, how the
heck do we get v6 glue added to the gtlds? specifically, i want to add
v6 glue for psg.com and rip.psg.com in the com zone.
similarly for the root, as rip.psg.com serves some tlds.
Depends on your reg
for those of us who are trying to provide dual stack services, how the
heck do we get v6 glue added to the gtlds? specifically, i want to add
v6 glue for psg.com and rip.psg.com in the com zone.
similarly for the root, as rip.psg.com serves some tlds.
randy
28 matches
Mail list logo
