http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595v=4view=2.0#AS27595
Gadi.
do that many networks really allow spoofing? i used
to think so, based on hearsay, but rob beverly's
http://spoofer.csail.mit.edu/summary.php suggests
things are a lot better than they used to be, arbor's
last survey echos same. are rob's numbers inconsistent
with numbers anyone else believes
Or is it?
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Gadi Evron wrote:
http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595v=4view=2.0#AS27595
Gadi.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the surprising thing -- no scenario. Very basic configuration.
Enabling uRPF and then hitting it with a few gig of non-routable packets
consistently caused the sup module to stop talking on the console, and
What do
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or is it?
Looks to not be, so I call BS on your subject line..
however, I do see:
* 64.28.176.0/20 71.13.116.101 100 0 20115
19151 26769 27595 i
* 204.11.128.105100
Gadi,
A quick look at route-views will confirm that Atrivo is multi-homed.
And WV Fiber is a transit provider to them, not a peer.
As NANOG community members in good standing, I'm sure WV, nLayer, etc
would take the appropriate action if you were to contact their
respective abuse departments,
On 9/6/08, Anton Kapela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
found a network operator using uRPF on Cisco gear.
(note: network operator. it's probably fine for several-hundred-meg
enterprise sites)
Forgive me, but what does
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Anton Kapela wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or is it?
Looks to not be, so I call BS on your subject line..
Thanks Anton! I appreciae you looking into it.
however, I do see:
* 64.28.176.0/20 71.13.116.101
Is there anyone hanging around here who happens to either be or can get me
in touch with a BGP-clueful person at Windstream/Alltel (AS7029)???
Unicast would be great, I hate to tie up the list with this, but the
standard prescribed methods haven't worked in 72 hours now...
Thanks in advance!
On Sep 6, 2008, at 1:27 PM, Paul Wall wrote:
A quick look at route-views will confirm that Atrivo is multi-homed.
And WV Fiber is a transit provider to them, not a peer.
As NANOG community members in good standing, I'm sure WV, nLayer, etc
would take the appropriate action if you were to
Can anyone comment authoritatively on the percentage of spam that's from a
leaky faucet compared to fire hose? The stuff I see in my customer base are
all fire hoses at the rate of 2.5, sometimes 5 message connection attempts
per second. (I bet an academic could study the rate of spam emissions
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Anton Kapela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anton's post that GX is still providing them transit is a bit curious, since
I was under the impression GX had severed all ties with Atrivo. But
12 matches
Mail list logo
