On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Joe Provo nanog-...@rsuc.gweep.net wrote:
Thanks for the feedback - please do keep it coming! We'll pop out
an updated draft to reflect the concensus when some equilibrium is
reached, but just to comment on some of the questions and points
raised so far
Martin Hannigan wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Joe Provo nanog-...@rsuc.gweep.net
mailto:nanog-...@rsuc.gweep.net wrote:
Thanks for the feedback - please do keep it coming! We'll pop out
an updated draft to reflect the concensus when some equilibrium is
Thanks guys.
-Amolak
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Arie Vayner arievay...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Amolak amolak.si...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is it possible to create L2 Etherchannel at one end and L3 etherchannel at
another end?
For Example:
SW-1
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 06:33:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
Cisco 6500/7600 with SUP720-3BXL handles 1mil routes
If I remember correctly, using certain function(s) like e.g. uRPF
halves this value (in FIB).
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- d...@ircnet -- PGP:
Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us writes:
I have a few Sprint EVDO cards. They go into standby when nothing is
actively going on and fire up within seconds when there is something to
do. I regularly use everything from SSH to streaming video without any
issues. I only notice the delay with
Hi all,
I wonder if here any people who own/maintain Cisco AGM, or maybe used
this device in past. I want to ask few questions.
Please reply offlist.
Thanks,
Konstantin
Cisco 6500/7600 with SUP720-3BXL handles 1mil routes
If I remember correctly, using certain function(s) like e.g. uRPF
halves this value (in FIB).
Old Sup2, yes. Sup720 and related, no.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
On Apr 9, 2009, at 7:15 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us writes:
I have a few Sprint EVDO cards. They go into standby when nothing is
actively going on and fire up within seconds when there is
something to
do. I regularly use everything from SSH to streaming
An Alcatel 7750SR can support over 1 million BGP routes in its FIB and I
assume that the Cisco XR12000 family would also be able to handle the full
table a year from now.
-Dan
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
I was chatting with someone the other day
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
I was chatting with someone the other day and we were trying to build a
complete list of all units which can handle full routing tables 1 year from
now, assuming current 4k/month growth (nevermind de-aggregation)
What
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Apr 8, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Tim Durack wrote:
Cisco 6500/7600 you replace SUP32 or SUP720 with SUP720-3BXL
...if I understand it, no other cards need replaced?
(note that this disagrees with my understanding of how their
FIB/CEF
Daniel Senie d...@senie.com writes:
We observe this same kind of behavior with firewalls in the path
watching for dead sessions they can clean up. Appears they send RSTs
to both end points when they decide a session has gone away, as
that'll let end hosts figure it out sooner. Same
Hi all, in most of the existing 2G/2.5G mobile PS-core (Packet Switch) networks
have Gi segment (interface between GGSN IP Router/firewall). Due to the IP
address constraint, operator usually do NAT on the Gi firewall to NAT the
private IP to public IP in the past. Looking at the traffic
On Thursday 09 April 2009 15:31:10 Daniel Senie wrote:
On Apr 9, 2009, at 7:15 AM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Interesting. When I got my Sprint EVDO card (u727) a year and a half
ago, they were pretty nasty about gunning down (bidirectional spoofed
RST coming out of the middle of the
Yup. Abovenet fiber between 200 Paul SFO and 11 Great Oaks SJC is currently
out of commission.
jason
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Stefan Molnar ste...@csudsu.com wrote:
VZ in the South Bay (San Jose) is out. As per news reports I watched at
6am PDT.
--Original Message--
200 Paul Ave is seeing several carriers down. I am also in Santa Cruz and
cannot make or receive long distance calls on my land lines. Unconfirmed
reports of Caltrain cut.
Cheers,
Aaron
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:37:14PM +, Stefan Molnar wrote:
VZ in the South Bay (San Jose) is out.
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia) wrote:
Hi all, in most of the existing 2G/2.5G mobile PS-core (Packet Switch)
networks have Gi segment (interface between GGSN IP Router/firewall).
Due to the IP address constraint, operator usually do NAT on the Gi
firewall to NAT the private
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:48 PM, Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia) wrote:
Please share your thought and thanks in advance :)
No, IMHO. Most broadband operators don't insert firewalls inline in
front of their subscribers, and wireless broadband is no different.
The infrastructure itself must be
On Thursday 09 April 2009 16:48:32 Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia) wrote:
Hi all, in most of the existing 2G/2.5G mobile PS-core (Packet Switch)
networks have Gi segment (interface between GGSN IP Router/firewall). Due
to the IP address constraint, operator usually do NAT on the Gi firewall to
NAT
On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:12:57 -0400
Robert E. Seastrom r...@seastrom.com wrote:
I use a Verizon Wireless u727; before that, I used a PCMCIA card.
I've never had problems with drops on idle. *However* -- if there
was a packet from the wrong IP address, the older card would drop
the
On Apr 10, 2009, at 12:17 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
Todays GGSN and other devices should handle it, even though they
didn't do it well 5+ years back.
There's a lot of legacy (and not-so-legacy) gear out there with weak
IP stacks; beyond that, the relevant BCPs like iACLs should be
On Apr 10, 2009, at 12:21 AM, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
I would think that, however you are providing IP addresses, any
ingress point
to a GSM core network ought to be carefully policed on security
grounds.
Sure. But stateful firewalls aren't required to protect that
infrastructure,
http://www.darkreading.com/securityservices/services/data/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216403220
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
I was chatting with someone the other day and we were trying to build a
complete list of all units which can handle full routing tables 1 year from
now,
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Steven M. Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu
wrote:
http://www.darkreading.com/securityservices/services/data/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216403220
This is different from ATM or FRAME or Private lines how? In the end,
MPLS is just a transport layer for the private
Well if we pull apart the article a bit
Quote 1)
Network infrastructure security has been in the limelight lately, with
researchers uncovering big vulnerabilities in the Domain Name System
(DNS), the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), TCP, and in Cisco routers.
Wasn't aware of any big
Hello,
Mercurynews.com is reporting telephone outages in Santa Clara and
Santa Cruz counties that started around 2:00 am local time. I
observed numerous carrier outages starting around 4:00 am local
time. Does anyone know if this is due to the same fiber cut, or are
these separate issues?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Steven M. Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
http://www.darkreading.com/securityservices/services/data/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=216403220
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
I'll wait to read their full presentation, but
Steven M. Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu writes:
Interesting. I never had that behavior exhibited on my old PCMCIA
card on Verizon or on my u727 on Sprint. What OS platform were
you on lappie-wise?
I run NetBSD but I know that the problem also showed up on Linux -- a
friend who worked for
Seeing the same thing have an oc48 down from abovenet out of 200 paul
-carlos
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Hughes [mailto:aar...@bind.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 9:13 AM
To: Stefan Molnar
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Fiber cut in SF area
200 Paul Ave is seeing several carriers
Meh...
Sure, it rehashes what we pretty well already know, If a bad guy can
get access to your network or your management tools, you're boned.
It's still worth reminding folks that they need to take appropriate
measures to defend and monitor these devices. Too many networks and
servers get
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 08:14:15AM -0700, Craig Holland wrote:
Just dropping a note that there is a fiber cut in the SF area (I have a
metro line down). AboveNet is reporting issues and I've heard unconfirmed
reports that ATT and VZW are affected as well.
Confirmed VZW ATT;
News coverage:
http://cow.org/r/?5459
http://cow.org/r/?545a
And not that I expect any useful updates:
http://twitter.com/attnews
-r
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 08:14:15AM -0700, Craig Holland wrote:
Just dropping a note that there is a fiber cut in the SF area (I have a
metro line down).
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:15:05AM -0600, David Edwards wrote:
Mercurynews.com is reporting telephone outages in Santa Clara and
Santa Cruz counties that started around 2:00 am local time. I
observed numerous carrier outages starting around 4:00 am local
time. Does anyone know if this
I saw my Sonic.net-over-ATT ADSL go dark at 02:30 local and it is still
down, served on a fiber remote out of SNCZCA01. (I'm guessing the 200
Paul outages are associated with where this ATM terminates and that's
the cause, rather than the service in/out of Santa Cruz County, but I
have no way
Level3 is having problems in the 216 area code as well (Cleveland)
George Roettger
-Original Message-
From: David Edwards [mailto:da...@reliablehosting.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:15 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Fiber cut in SF area
Hello,
Mercurynews.com is
Anyone know where the actual cut is?
On 4/9/09, David W. Hankins david_hank...@isc.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 08:14:15AM -0700, Craig Holland wrote:
Just dropping a note that there is a fiber cut in the SF area (I have a
metro line down). AboveNet is reporting issues and I've heard
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Wayne E. Bouchard w...@typo.org wrote:
Meh...
Sure, it rehashes what we pretty well already know, If a bad guy can
get access to your network or your management tools, you're boned.
actually... what it says is that 'hey, your VPN' isn't really
'private' like an
isn't there a mailing list for this sort of thing? outages@ I think it is?
(not that I mind, just a little advert for the appropriate forum, and
a place that MAY have some useful info on this topic)
-chris
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Ravi Pina r...@cow.org wrote:
News coverage:
Ravi Pina wrote:
News coverage:
http://cow.org/r/?5459
http://cow.org/r/?545a
And not that I expect any useful updates:
http://twitter.com/attnews
Lots of folks covering the same thing...
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=fiber+cut
http://search.twitter.com/search?q=outage
Also
- Original Message -
From: Wayne E. Bouchard w...@typo.org
To: Charles Wyble char...@thewybles.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: attacks on MPLS?
Meh...
Sure, it rehashes what we pretty well already know, If a bad guy can
get access to
Service to South Santa Clara county is completely down: Internet,
landline, and cellphones. Both Verizon and ATT are affected. 911 is
also down.
My cellphones show one or no bars. Normally they are all four bars.
The idea that all of that is lumped in one fiber bundle is mind boggling.
On
Monterey Highway I think
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know where the actual cut is?
On 4/9/09, David W. Hankins david_hank...@isc.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 08:14:15AM -0700, Craig Holland wrote:
Just dropping a note that there is a
From the news coverage it appears to be in the general area of
http://cow.org/r/?545c
-r
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:11:58AM -0700, Mike Lyon wrote:
Anyone know where the actual cut is?
On 4/9/09, David W. Hankins david_hank...@isc.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 08:14:15AM -0700, Craig
Monterey Road just north of Blossom Hill, San Jose
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know where the actual cut is?
On 4/9/09, David W. Hankins david_hank...@isc.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 08:14:15AM -0700, Craig Holland wrote:
Just dropping
Mike Lyon writes:
Anyone know where the actual cut is?
According to SF Chronicle:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/09/BAP816VTE6.DTLtsp=1
The fiber-optic cables were severed shortly before 1:30 a.m. along Monterey
Highway north of Blossom Hill Road in south San Jose,
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
isn't there a mailing list for this sort of thing? outages@ I think it is?
Jared put together long time ago outages at outages.org seems to still be
active and receiving reports about this one.
List archive is at
oh and heres the vid so you can see the demos
http://www.shmoocon.org/2009/videos/AllYourPackets-Rey.m4v
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Christian Koch christ...@automatick.netwrote:
They presented on the same topic at shmoocon, not sure if the info is any
more updated for BH EUROPE, but
Hey Chris,
Yes. outa...@outages.org is the one.
Alex
Christopher Morrow wrote:
isn't there a mailing list for this sort of thing? outages@ I think it is?
(not that I mind, just a little advert for the appropriate forum, and
a place that MAY have some useful info on this topic)
-chris
On
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:45:08AM -0400, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Daniel Senie d...@senie.com writes:
We observe this same kind of behavior with firewalls in the path
watching for dead sessions they can clean up. Appears they send RSTs
to both end points when they decide a session has
Yeah. It's on outages. Not much useful there.
Christopher Morrow wrote:
isn't there a mailing list for this sort of thing? outages@ I think it is?
(not that I mind, just a little advert for the appropriate forum, and
a place that MAY have some useful info on this topic)
-chris
On Thu, Apr 9,
nice article on bitgravity blog regarding the cuts..
http://sandbox.bitgravity.com/blog/2009/04/09/destroy-the-internet-with-a-hacksaw/
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Charles Wyble char...@thewybles.comwrote:
Ravi Pina wrote:
News coverage:
http://cow.org/r/?5459
Anyone know where the actual cut is?
Based on the previously posted news articles ..
First one is in this proximity : 37°15'20.79N 121°48'9.38W
Second one is in this proximity : 37°29'44.00N 122°14'44.31W
First one is along a highway .. second one is along railroad tracks.
Google
I had written in a NANOG reply:
Mike Lyon writes:
Anyone know where the actual cut is?
According to SF Chronicle:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/09/BAP816VTE6.DTLtsp=1
The fiber-optic cables were severed shortly before 1:30 a.m. along Monterey
Highway north of Blossom
My cellphones show one or no bars. Normally they are all four bars.
hmmm, probably not related but could be that some cellphone operators are
restricting coverage to give priority to emergency svcs communications.
That ATT has stopped provisioning protection fiber for automatic
restoral is mind boggling.
That our crack (or on crack) govt contracting/emergency-preparedness
staff didn't demand protected facilities for 911 is another mind
boggling issue.
That there is no over-under wide-area back-up
Robert M. Enger wrote:
We posture and orate about being prepared for terrorist attacks and
natural disasters, and then events like these reveal the reality:
The emperor has no clothes.
You wouldn't have clothes either if you could double your profit by not
wearing any.
Matthew Kaufman
Yeah, that's about the right amount of time to crawl out of a man hole,
cover it back up, get in the car, drive to a 24 hour starbucks, pick up some
coffee and drive up to San Carlos, open man-hole, repeat process...
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:31 PM, George William Herbert
At 12:55 PM 4/9/2009, you wrote:
From the news coverage it appears to be in the general area of
http://cow.org/r/?545c
-r
Interesting. The report I got from a vendor was that it is Above.net
with a fiber cut in Redwood City which is affecting a circuit of mine
between 200 Paul in SF and
Verizon filters unsolicited inbound traffic for their EVDO customers in my
experience.
- S
-Original Message-
From: Roland Dobbins rdobb...@cisco.com
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 09:32
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Do we still need Gi Firewall for 3G/UMTS/HSPA network ?
Jorge Amodio wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
isn't there a mailing list for this sort of thing? outages@ I think it is?
Jared put together long time ago outages at outages.org seems to still be
active and receiving reports about this
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, George William Herbert wrote:
The fiber-optic cables were severed shortly before 1:30 a.m. along Monterey
Highway north of Blossom Hill Road in south San Jose, police Sgt. Ronnie Lopez
said.
The fact that it's vandalism is VERY annoying. Sadly it also shows how
vulnerable
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Michael Holstein
michael.holst...@csuohio.edu wrote:
First one is in this proximity : 37°15'20.79N 121°48'9.38W
Street view shows a few manholes in the vicinity.
Second one is in this proximity : 37°29'44.00N 122°14'44.31W
Didn't see anything obvious here.
Michael Holstein wrote:
Anyone know where the actual cut is?
Based on the previously posted news articles ..
First one is in this proximity : 37°15'20.79N 121°48'9.38W
Second one is in this proximity : 37°29'44.00N 122°14'44.31W
First one is along a highway .. second one is along
A sobering touché.
Jay Murphy
IP Network Specialist
NM Department of Health
ITSD - IP Network Operations
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87502
Bus. Ph.: 505.827.2851
We move the information that moves your world.
-Original Message-
From: Robert M. Enger [mailto:en...@enger.us]
Sent:
On Apr 9, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Robert M. Enger wrote:
That ATT has stopped provisioning protection fiber for automatic
restoral is mind boggling.
That our crack (or on crack) govt contracting/emergency-preparedness
staff didn't demand protected facilities for 911 is another mind
boggling
Hi Everyone,
Please can someone assist me with this wierdness
DEAD: RADIUS server server3:1812,1813 is not responding.
Apr 9 2009 21:28:42.001 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS server
server3:1812,1813 has returned.
Apr 9 2009 21:28:43.953 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_DEAD: RADIUS server
Yep it leads to:
Activity Type Code Desc: PROGRESS COMMENTS
Activity Type Code: PROG
OTDR readings were taken by ATT West and a cut was located 1600 ft from
the San Jose, CA central office. ATT West technicians are onsite
working to isolate the exact location of the cut. There are 4
There were multiple cuts. South san jose and san carlos. Yours would
be the san carlos one :)
On 4/9/09, David Edwards da...@reliablehosting.com wrote:
At 12:55 PM 4/9/2009, you wrote:
From the news coverage it appears to be in the general area of
http://cow.org/r/?545c
-r
Interesting. The
David Edwards wrote:
At 12:55 PM 4/9/2009, you wrote:
From the news coverage it appears to be in the general area of
http://cow.org/r/?545c
-r
Interesting. The report I got from a vendor was that it is Above.net
with a fiber cut in Redwood City which is affecting a circuit of mine
Robert M. Enger wrote:
That ATT has stopped provisioning protection fiber for automatic
restoral is mind boggling.
That our crack (or on crack) govt contracting/emergency-preparedness
staff didn't demand protected facilities for 911 is another mind
boggling issue.
911 centers can work
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Joe Abley wrote:
I am hearing from multiple people about connectivity problems in the bay
area, and they all seem to have 200 Paul in common. ISC is reporting a
fibre cut between 529 Bryant, Palo Alto and 200 Paul, SF. At least one
Unitedlayer customer in 200 Paul seems to
Looks like our circuit out of 200 paul from abovenet is back up.
-Original Message-
From: David Edwards [mailto:da...@reliablehosting.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:06 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Fiber cut in SF area
At 12:55 PM 4/9/2009, you wrote:
From the news
Seriously though I want to start some discussion around outside plant
protection. This isn't the middle of the ocean or desert after all.
There were multiple fiber cuts in a major metropolitan area, resulting
in the loss of critical infrastructure necessary to many peoples daily
lives (though
David Edwards wrote:
At 12:55 PM 4/9/2009, you wrote:
From the news coverage it appears to be in the general area of
http://cow.org/r/?545c
-r
Interesting. The report I got from a vendor was that it is Above.net
with a fiber cut in Redwood City which is affecting a circuit of mine
between
Yep verizon does indeed filter all unsolicated inbound traffic to the
EVDO network. It can be a blessing or a curse. :)
Skywing wrote:
Verizon filters unsolicited inbound traffic for their EVDO customers in my
experience.
- S
-Original Message-
From: Roland Dobbins
http://i.gizmodo.com/5205952/att-putting-up-10-reward-for-cable-cutting-vandals
r
On Apr 9, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Michael Holstein
michael.holst...@csuohio.edu wrote:
First one is in this proximity : 37°15'20.79N 121°48'9.38W
Street
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
That our crack (or on crack) govt contracting/emergency-preparedness staff
didn't demand protected facilities for 911 is another mind boggling issue.
This costs $$$ and usually isn't a problem as there are other ways to
Appears I can get to Yahoo without 4000ms of latency now too and I don't
have to be routed from San Jose, Ca to Philly to DC.
-Mike
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Carlos Alcantar car...@race.com wrote:
Looks like our circuit out of 200 paul from abovenet is back up.
-Original
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Jared Mauch wrote:
That ATT has stopped provisioning protection fiber for automatic restoral
is mind boggling.
Only helps with N-1 breaks. Unfortunately, sometimes there are N+1
breaks. Check the NANOG archives, I believe there were 5 breaks in one
day in the 1990's;
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 18:04, Charles Wyble char...@thewybles.com wrote:
Seriously though I want to start some discussion around outside plant
protection. This isn't the middle of the ocean or desert after all.
I'll pipe in with this:
No amount of money can deter a determined entity. If there
Hold on. Who says this sabotage?
These incidents happen all the time without sabotage being involved. A ship
sank off the coast of Pakistan and took out both international cables serving
the country ...
We had the undersea earthquake that seven seven cables in the Taiwan straits.
The truth
I didn't say it was sabatoage...
It would appear
that this was a deliberate act
I tried to be very careful to say that it appears to have been
sabatoage, but that it's not confirmed. Also this isn't the middle of
the ocean, but cable underground. That usually doesn't get cut unless
it's
Sounds like the NAS spitting this out has been ACL'd
from the RAD's somehow...
Bruce Anthony Grobler wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Please can someone assist me with this wierdness
DEAD: RADIUS server server3:1812,1813 is not responding.
Apr 9 2009 21:28:42.001 UTC: %RADIUS-4-RADIUS_ALIVE: RADIUS
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
#ifdef CONSPIRACY_THEORIST
What if this isn't simple vandalism?
#endif
If my read is correct, this is multiple cuts in multiple locations.
To answer the what-if (What if this isn't simple vandalism?) : It's not.
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:04:16PM -0700, Charles Wyble wrote:
Seriously though I want to start some discussion around outside plant
protection. This isn't the middle of the ocean or desert after all.
There were multiple fiber cuts in a major metropolitan area, resulting
in the loss of
On Apr 9, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Charles Wyble wrote:
Seriously though I want to start some discussion around outside
plant protection. This isn't the middle of the ocean or desert after
all.
There were multiple fiber cuts in a major metropolitan area,
resulting in the loss of critical
No RF, no WPS.
If all the base stations are knocked out in a region, and there is no
over coverage from towers out of the affected region then there are no
channels to which priority access can be allotted.
A potential remedy (at least for conventional cell phones) would be to
scatter
Scott Doty wrote:
(Personally, I can think of a MAE-Clueless episode that was worse than
this, but that was in the 90's...)
The gas main strike out front of the building in Santa Clara?
Or something else?
-george william herbert
gherb...@retro.com
It's amusing to see the media's (misdirected) focus on the event.
Expected : MULTIPLE COORDINATED FIBER CUTS TAKE OUT 911, PHONE, CELL,
INTERNET TO TENS OF THOUSANDS
Google News: ATT uses Twitter ...
(link)http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10216712-94.html
*shakes head*
Rod Beck wrote:
Hold on. Who says this sabotage?
By the time the second plane hit WTC, intent was apparent. I think in
this case intent is also apparent based on proximity (and the previously
mentioned reward ATT has posted for the capture of vandals).
Mike
has anyone been able to pin point the cut?
There have been mentions of Redwood City, San Carlos, San Francisco.
Where exactly is the cut?
William R. Lorenz wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Joe Abley wrote:
I am hearing from multiple people about connectivity problems in the
bay area, and they
Quick search on Google.
Looks like there is a colo at 200 Paul Ave. San Francisco, CA 94124
---
Selected businesses at this address:
BT Americas?
Core 180 Inc?
Day Nite Trade Bindery?
Facebook Inc? - 1 review
Hallo Communications?
Minute Factory The?
Net Logic?
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Rod Beck rod.b...@hiberniaatlantic.com wrote:
Hold on. Who says this sabotage?
the hacksaw that was taken to two manholes within two hours of each
other? I'd love to see the RFO explaining an accident like that.
Hi Charles/Skywing, is Verizon filter the unsolicated inbound traffic on the
firewall or on the border router?
Regards,
Steven Lee
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wyble [mailto:char...@thewybles.com]
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 6:09 AM
To: Skywing
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Do we
Charles Wyble wrote:
So allow me to think out loud for a minute
1) Why wasn't the fiber protected by some sort of hardened/locked
conduit? Is this possible? Does it add extensive cost or hamper normal
operation?
Some people do lock their vaults/pits/manholes. But, to be honest, I'm
On 9 Apr 2009, at 21:32, John Martinez wrote:
Quick search on Google.
Looks like there is a colo at 200 Paul Ave. San Francisco, CA 94124
I can confirm that indeed there is, hence my mail :-)
On 9 Apr 2009, at 22:25, Joe Abley wrote:
On 9 Apr 2009, at 21:32, John Martinez wrote:
Quick search on Google.
Looks like there is a colo at 200 Paul Ave. San Francisco, CA 94124
I can confirm that indeed there is, hence my mail :-)
Hence my mail to the outages list, I mean, which is
The reports seem to be settling on 2 distinct sites -- South
San Jose and San Carlos. The former had 4 cuts and latter
just 1.
-r
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 06:27:53PM -0700, John Martinez wrote:
has anyone been able to pin point the cut?
There have been mentions of Redwood City, San Carlos, San
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Ravi Pina r...@cow.org wrote:
The reports seem to be settling on 2 distinct sites -- South
San Jose and San Carlos. The former had 4 cuts and latter
just 1.
ATT already put a statement mentioning the two sites and offering
a $100K reward
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
