Martin Hannigan wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Joe Provo <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the feedback - please do keep it coming! We'll pop out > an updated draft to reflect the concensus when some equilibrium is > reached, but just to comment on some of the questions and points > raised so far (both on-list and off): > > > - Costs were intended to be covered under the "Have finite and > well-defined requirements for support [...]" (WRT static/sunk > costs of labour, etc) and "a statement regarding resources the > proposer is committing to supply" (WRT money or specific equipment > needed for the experiment). The draft will be updated to make > both more explict. > - > > > > It would be interesting to suggest that a copy of all raw data collected > to be provided back to the community so that they too could share in the > research or create derivatives from it (with proper attribution for all > work product of course).
As a goal that's exactly the opposite of how we've done it in the past. not sure that it's necessarily a bad idea, just saying. > Best, > > Martin > > > -- > Martin Hannigan [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > p: +16178216079 > Power, Network, and Costs Consulting for Iceland Datacenters and Occupants > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Nanog-futures mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
