Hi,
I'm looking for glue record for ns1.push.mobi so I ask one of the root
name server.
It gives me the list of dot mobi authorized name servers.
I'm expecting it to be answered by one of the mobi tld authorized name
servers, but it's telling me that it delegates the answer to
ns1.push.mobi
Did you check the ADDITIONAL SECTION in what you've pasted below?
Scott.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Anton Zimm anton.z...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for glue record for ns1.push.mobi so I ask one of the root
name server.
It gives me the list of dot mobi authorized name
Because it gave you the IP of ns1 ns2.push.mobi in the additional section?
Looks like a pretty normal answer for a TLD server.
John van Oppen
Spectrum Networks LLC
206.973.8302 (Direct)
206.973.8300 (main office)
-Original Message-
From: Anton Zimm [mailto:anton.z...@gmail.com]
In message 1e0e55280905282306v69cea6b7m22b7ea6e8dea6...@mail.gmail.com, Anton
Zimm writes:
Hi,
I'm looking for glue record for ns1.push.mobi so I ask one of the root
name server.
It gives me the list of dot mobi authorized name servers.
I'm expecting it to be answered by one of the mobi
Beat me to it.. Bleh.
Though I will admit, this reminds me of a very painful experience when I
got my first dedicated server back in 1999. Death me to BIND. Glad I'm
not a DNS admin :)
//warren
-Original Message-
From: Scott Howard [mailto:sc...@doc.net.au]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009
Moin!
On 29.05.2009, at 03:06, Peter Charbonneau wrote:
Firewalls are Cisco ASAs that pass all traffic to/from the
nameservers.
Fragments are allowed through.
Is this the firewall formerly known as PIX? If so we had problems with
our DNS server until we put the following line in our
I elect Ralf as owner of the longest email signature in history..
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Weber r...@colt.net
To: Peter Charbonneau peter.charbonn...@williams.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu May 28 22:47:19 2009
Subject: Re: DNS ed.gov translations
Moin!
On
I did see the info from additional section, but:
Afaik the additional section is not an answer, they're just additional
info, not an authorized answer from the queried name server. I'm
expecting to get a reply for my 'A' query in the 'answer section'.
Now, from the 'authority section' dig is
* Peter Charbonneau:
ed.gov. 86400 IN NS eduptcdns02.ed.gov.
ed.gov. 86400 IN NS eduftcdns01.ed.gov.
ed.gov. 86400 IN NS eduftcdns02.ed.gov.
ed.gov. 86400 IN NS
* Anton Zimm:
I did see the info from additional section, but:
Afaik the additional section is not an answer, they're just additional
info, not an authorized answer from the queried name server. I'm
expecting to get a reply for my 'A' query in the 'answer section'.
The MOBI. servers are not
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Anton Zimm anton.z...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, from the 'authority section' dig is telling me that I can get the
authorize answer from ns1.push.mobi. But isn't that circular
dependency?
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@bfk.de wrote:
* Anton Zimm:
I did see the info from additional section, but:
Afaik the additional section is not an answer, they're just additional
info, not an authorized answer from the queried name server. I'm
expecting to get a
On 2009/05/29 09:48 AM Anton Zimm wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@bfk.de wrote:
* Anton Zimm:
I did see the info from additional section, but:
Afaik the additional section is not an answer, they're just additional
info, not an authorized answer from the
* Anton Zimm:
I can not find the Glue Record. Where is the Glue Record?
It's in the additional section.
--
Florian Weimerfwei...@bfk.de
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 02:48:33PM +0700, Anton Zimm wrote:
I can not find the Glue Record. Where is the Glue Record?
You've been told where it is. Stop repeating the question. Its answer
won't change.
james
--
The probable future is that in time, the use of the apostrophe-s will become
the
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Anton Zimm anton.z...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, from the 'authority section' dig is telling me that I can get the
authorize answer from ns1.push.mobi. But isn't that circular
dependency?
VoIP related issues is one of the reason I lurk here.
On carrier routing side voice (including VoIP) is still a closed network.
The group has given references for vendor oriented the efforts of the
i3forum http://www.i3forum.org/
John Todd has a list called freenum http://www.freenum.org/ which
BGP Update Report
Interval: 27-Apr-09 -to- 28-May-09 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS638957046 1.0% 13.1 -- BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK -
BellSouth.net Inc.
2 - AS3130
This report has been generated at Fri May 29 21:18:11 2009 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 02:48:33PM +0700, Anton Zimm wrote:
I get this: MOBI servers are not authoritative for push.mobi zone,
ns1.push.mobi is authoritative for it.
But since ns1.push.mobi is inside push.mobi zone, this create circular
reference. Afaik to solve this circular dependency,
Google is your ... well ... anyway.
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch8/ns.html
Anton Zimm wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Anton Zimm anton.z...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, from the 'authority section' dig is
On May 28, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Adam Goodman wrote:
Just installed a cisco 7204vxr with a DS3 interface. we are not
getting more
than 5Mbits.
So, how are you testing? A single flow maybe?
show interface is not reporting any errors. the provider tech put a
piece
test equipment on the
two quick reminders:
1) the nanog discount rate on the hotel is mostly (but not completely)
full and i believe it expires today. if you're planning on coming to
nanog, please register for the conference and book a hotel room. or
pay more for the privilege of both experiences.
The White House just put out a release on net security[1] - at first glance
a mission/vision/values paper, the release page[2] also containing a short
video[3].
At first glance, this looks promising - anyone else get a chance to
read/review? Comments?
-jamie
[1]
fine piece of work.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:37:58AM -0500, jamie rishaw wrote:
The White House just put out a release on net security[1] - at first glance
a mission/vision/values paper, the release page[2] also containing a short
video[3].
At first glance, this looks promising -
The Nation’s approach to cybersecurity over the past 15 years has failed to
keep pace with the threat.
I think that they may be getting it...
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:41 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
fine piece of work.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:37:58AM -0500, jamie rishaw
Hi All,
I am having a hell of a time trying to figure out who it is I need to
contact to get this fixed. I just got a new /21 allocation from ARIN and am
announcing it with no issues. I can ping anywhere and the planet can see me.
The issue I am having is that when I surf out on this new
We last went through this 30 days ago.
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg17619.html
-porkchop
On 5/29/09 1:50 PM, Clue Store cluest...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am having a hell of a time trying to figure out who it is I need to
contact to get this fixed. I just got a new /21
Thanks for the follow up. I admit I didn't search the archives ;)
So this sux there's really no way to fix this but contact as many geo
location folks as possible and have them update. I can't even get to alot of
sites in the US because of this. UGH!!!
Max
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:55 PM,
You just flashed me back to alt.fan.warlord.
That .sig is nothing. No ASCII sword or any BUAG involved at all.
On 5/29/2009 at 12:04 AM, Warren Bailey wbai...@gci.com wrote:
I elect Ralf as owner of the longest email signature in history..
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Weber
Check the archives. This gets discussed on a regular basis. Both google
and akami have methods in place for this to be corrected.
Clue Store wrote:
Hi All,
I am having a hell of a time trying to figure out who it is I need to
contact to get this fixed. I just got a new /21 allocation from ARIN
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith
On May 29, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Andrew Euell wrote:
The Nation’s approach to cybersecurity over the past 15 years has
failed to
keep pace with the threat.
I think that they may be getting it...
From my experience, people get it, but security is always a balance
between making something
It took us over 3 months with Google to update. They never once said the info
was wrong, and it was not even a new ARIN allocation.
--Original Message--
From: Clue Store
To: Kaegler, Mike
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Geo Location and DNS
Sent: May 29, 2009 11:02 AM
Thanks for the
You may have to contact maxmind, the keepers of the geoip database.
correct...@maxmind.com
Curtis
Stefan Molnar wrote:
It took us over 3 months with Google to update. They never once said the info was wrong, and it was not even a new ARIN allocation.
--Original Message--
From:
At first glance, this looks promising - anyone else get a chance to
read/review? Comments?
You might hate Marcus Ranum, or love him, but the presentation he did
at the DojoSec in March
is related to this subject, and it is well worth the hour:
http://vimeo.com/3519680
--
Marcin Antkiewicz
Clue Store wrote:
Hi All,
I am having a hell of a time trying to figure out who it is I need to
contact to get this fixed. I just got a new /21 allocation from ARIN and am
announcing it with no issues. I can ping anywhere and the planet can see me.
The issue I am having is that when I surf out
Has anyone encountered a 6524 dropping packets larger than 1492? IOS
12.2(33)SXH2a
Warren Bailey
GCI Communication Corp.
RF Network Engineering
907.868.5911 office
907.903.5410 mobile
In message 20090529123246.gb8...@vacation.karoshi.com., bmann...@vacation.kar
oshi.com writes:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 02:48:33PM +0700, Anton Zimm wrote:
I get this: MOBI servers are not authoritative for push.mobi zone,
ns1.push.mobi is authoritative for it.
But since ns1.push.mobi is
We use Cisco 6524s with packets up to 1546 bytes with no issues. IOS
ZU2, but we are testing SXI1 with no MTU issues so far.
Rubens
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Warren Bailey wbai...@gci.com wrote:
Has anyone encountered a 6524 dropping packets larger than 1492? IOS
12.2(33)SXH2a
40 matches
Mail list logo
