On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 02:14:31AM -0400, kris foster wrote:
> Simply untrue, at the Peering BOF yesterday Cogent said they are
> rolling this out.
They saw my "How to deploy IPv6 in 30 minutes or less" tutorial on
Sunday and apparently it actually worked. Unfortunately I neglected to
mention t
On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:17 AM, Michael K. Smith wrote:
On 6/11/09 7:37 AM, "Steve Bertrand" wrote:
Stephen Kratzer wrote:
And, they have no plans to support IPv6.
Ouch!
I hope this is a non-starter for a lot of folks.
Steve
To quote Randy, I encourage all my competitors to do this.
S
On 6/11/09 7:37 AM, "Steve Bertrand" wrote:
> Stephen Kratzer wrote:
>
>> And, they have no plans to support IPv6.
>
> Ouch!
>
> I hope this is a non-starter for a lot of folks.
>
> Steve
To quote Randy, I encourage all my competitors to do this.
Mike
An update here. Reuters is reporting that the US State Department is
behind this maintenance being pushed back.
http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSWBT01137420090616?feedType=RSS&feedName=internetNews&rpc=22&sp=true
I find it very interesting that the US government is seeing the us
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Steve Pirk wrote:
> There are some, ehrm, "boxen" out on the 'net to allow them to get around
> the active blocking going on, but most of the citizen reporters are unable
> to even get a conection to allow proxying out. Some serious censoring of
> 'net access going
John Levine wrote:
Not that I've ever seen. Nobody else has the breadth of data that
Spamhaus does.
I've been using it for ages and based on zero complaints, it's never
blocked anything that any of my users wanted.
R's,
John
I have to agree with this...I'm somewhat surprised to see some of
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:48:07 -0500
Jack Bates wrote:
> Erik Fichtner wrote:
> >
> > And yet, all upgrades can be postponed with the right... motivation.
> >
>
>
> Hmmm, you do know that motivation may have strictly been, "Your
> maintenance corresponds with a major event, can you put it off
Justin Shore wrote:
> Paul Timmins wrote:
>> GlobalCrossing told me today I can order native IPv6 anywhere on their
>> network. Don't know if they count as Tier 1 on your list, though. VZB
>> has given me tunnels for a while, hopefully they'll get their pMTU
>> issue fixed so we can do more interes
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Stephen Kratzer wrote:
>
>> And, they have no plans to support IPv6.
>
> Ouch!
>
> I hope this is a non-starter for a lot of folks.
read the rest of the thread...
joel
> Steve
today, at our lunchtime meeting, the nanog program committee selected a new
chair, david meyer of cisco and university of oregon, and a new vice-chair,
tom daly of dynamic network services. please join me in cogratulating them
in person if you're here at nanog.
for the past two years, ren provo h
> Is there a competing droplist, that can be compared against
> Spamhaus's droplist?
Not that I've ever seen. Nobody else has the breadth of data that
Spamhaus does.
I've been using it for ages and based on zero complaints, it's never
blocked anything that any of my users wanted.
R's,
John
On Jun 16, 2009, at 4:43 PM, Peter Dambier wrote:
http://wnagele.com/2007/06/19/spamhouseorg-vs-nicat/
Another problem with spamhaus, they want to earn money.
The Pirates Party in germany is a nonprofit.
Nevertheless our mailers use a fixed addresses and when
you query spamhaus long enough from
http://wnagele.com/2007/06/19/spamhouseorg-vs-nicat/
Another problem with spamhaus, they want to earn money.
The Pirates Party in germany is a nonprofit.
Nevertheless our mailers use a fixed addresses and when
you query spamhaus long enough from a fixed address
you are put on a blacklist and fed w
On Jun 16, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Quinn Mahoney wrote:
Is there a competing droplist, that can be compared against Spamhaus's
droplist? That seems like an extraordinary claim, so I'm not
satisfied
with the evidence provided. Is this not the best droplist?
Extraordinary claims require extraordi
Also I don't like those lists at all
http://www.heise.de/ix/nixspam/dnsbl_en/
Heise do print the very important magazines IX, CT and others in germany.
They depend on their emails coming through.
Kind regards
Peter
Quinn Mahoney wrote:
> Is there a competing droplist, that can be compared agai
> Is there a competing droplist, that can be compared against Spamhaus's
> droplist? That seems like an extraordinary claim, so I'm not satisfied
> with the evidence provided. Is this not the best droplist?
Obviously the Spamhaus DROP list should be evaluated - you should not
use such lists unre
Is there a competing droplist, that can be compared against Spamhaus's
droplist? That seems like an extraordinary claim, so I'm not satisfied
with the evidence provided. Is this not the best droplist?
-Original Message-
From: Dean Anderson [mailto:d...@av8.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 20
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Tehran is currently UTC/GMT +4:30 hours. The current downtime is for 2:00 PM
Pacific, or 1:30 AM in
Tehran. That seems to be unfortunately still "prime time" for the nightly
demonstrations, one of which is
going on now.
If the idea is to avoid such
On Jun 16, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
Erik Fichtner wrote:
And yet, all upgrades can be postponed with the right... motivation.
Hmmm, you do know that motivation may have strictly been, "Your
maintenance corresponds with a major event, can you put it off for a
day?"
The main
What's interesting is that the !NANOG part of the universe presumes
the maintenance was to be performed by Twitter, not by their carrier
(i.e. server, not network, upgrades). Given the fact that the
WhaleFail has become a commonly-recognizable sight, I can see this
make people a bit, um, ne
Erik Fichtner wrote:
And yet, all upgrades can be postponed with the right... motivation.
Hmmm, you do know that motivation may have strictly been, "Your
maintenance corresponds with a major event, can you put it off for a day?"
The maintenance in question has obviously been marked critic
21 matches
Mail list logo
