On Jul 2, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Sean Figgins wrote:
Andy Davidson wrote:
A good quality meeting 'Fringe' is a defining characteristic of a mature
community. Let it happen. The fringe is the test-bed for stuff too crazy
or early for the formal agenda. Promote this ad-hoc stuff on the nanog
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
The $600 is only the walk-up fee. NANOG is less if you register earlier,
as little as $450.
As for whether that is expensive or not, I encourage readers to research
other conferences and compare for themselves.
Thanks for the clarification. I remembered it
On 04.07.10 1:27, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 2010-07-03 13:08, Andy Davidson wrote:
On 3 Jul 2010, at 04:29, Simon Lyall wrote:
Unless people serious intended for the organisation to have regular [1]
meetings outside of North America (which I doubt)
No, don't. The rest of
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 19:29 -0700, Mike wrote:
Yeah, that's what the brochure says anyways,
I have been in the ISP business since early 1993. I have used a
LOT of Cisco gear in the past 17 years. I am fully aware of
it's functionality and it limits.
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010, Alan Bryant wrote:
Does anyone know of a solution to connect a POS OC-3 to a router running
Mikrotik's RouterOS? I have searched google extensively with varying
phrases and nothing helpful comes out of it.
I don't know much about Mikrotik, but there are OC-3 interfaces
If your routing platform doesn't have POS OC-3, you can use a
converter to map Ethernet services to it and keep using the platform
you've been using. You lose a little on efficiency and failure
detection, but turning BFD on might help:
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Routing/BFD
I've worked
On 02.07.10 0:27, Randy Bush wrote:
The question is because gTLDs operations are in the USA, does it mean
that the USA have control over all those domain names?
the usg controls the cctlds too.
you know better...
randy
On 02.07.10 2:01, Randy Bush wrote:
There is a part 2 as well
and this is a bug or a feature?
I see it is a feature ...
You can always use a Gig-E - OC3c/STM1 media converter. I've used one
from RAD just to provide OC3c access speeds for some over Cisco 75xx
routers which don't support POS interfaces. Works great.
Tim McKee
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 16:07 -0500, Butch Evans wrote:
On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 12:22
OK, I'll bite and add my 2 Russian kopecks to the Cisco vs. Linux router
thread.
To make it clear where I'm coming from, I see the networking world from
the viewpoint of non-Ethernet WAN interfaces. A world consisting of
nothing but Ethernet is too bland and boring for me to live in, and I
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010, Michael Sokolov wrote:
OK, I'll bite and add my 2 Russian kopecks to the Cisco vs. Linux router
thread.
It's ok. I'll trade you Russian for Australian currency. I don't know
which is going to be better in the long run.
With non-Ethernet WAN interfaces one really needs an
Adrian Chadd adr...@creative.net.au wrote:
FreeBSD netgraph. It's clean, it's generalised, it's just not very well
documented.
[...]
Have a chat to the FreeBSD community. There's a powerpc port. Shoehorn
FreeBSD into it somehow, help tidy up the code to do whateveer you need
and start
12 matches
Mail list logo
