On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Jeff Wheeler j...@inconcepts.biz wrote:
It's the same thing that happens if you toss a /8 on an IPv4 LAN and
start banging away at the ARP table, while expecting all of your
legitimate hosts within that /8 to continue working correctly. We all
know that's
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 06:23:26PM +0200, Shepherd Magumo wrote:
Odds are, they're looking for a willing host for a snowshoe spamming
operation. If I wanted space for something like that, Afrinic
region providers would not be my first choice...particularly for the
hosting.
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
I'm super-tired of the but tcams are an expensive
non-commodity part not subject to economies of scale. this
has been repeated ad nauseam since the raws workshop if not before.
You don't have to build a lookup engine around a
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
On 3/11/2011 8:24 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
No, it isn't. Contrary to mailing list best practices, NANOG
unsubscribe information is stubbornly stashed in the email
Hi
ls there any program/way to monitor the switch port/switch status when
it reaches to certain bandwidth?
Thank you so much
On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 08:00 -0500, William Herrin wrote:
You're either building a bunch of big TCAMs or a radix trie engine
with sufficient parallelism to get the same aggregate lookup rate. If
there's a materially different 3rd way to build a FIB, one that works
at least as well, feel free
Registration for NANOG 52 is open. Something new this time around: There
is a $25 discount for NewNOG members.
Please register soon and see you in Denver.
Dave
(for the NANOG PC)
___
NANOG-announce mailing list
nanog-annou...@nanog.org
I use this Nagios plugin for up/down status alerts, it has some support for
interface bandwidth (and errors/discards) monitoring. It's just a perl script
so you could easily modify it to suit your needs.
http://nagios.manubulon.com/snmp_int.html
-wil
On Mar 12, 2011, at 5:51 AM, Deric Kwok
Anyone have a list of MUAs that actually support RFC 2369 with
subscription management widgets in the GUI? Surely someone has written
one but I can't seem to find any documentation to that effect.
Alpine, which has what must be the cruddiest GUI on the planet, does.
Too bad people prefer glitz to
--As of March 12, 2011 3:02:38 PM +, John Levine is alleged to have
said:
Anyone have a list of MUAs that actually support RFC 2369 with
subscription management widgets in the GUI? Surely someone has written
one but I can't seem to find any documentation to that effect.
Alpine, which has
William Herrin b...@herrin.us writes:
Anyone have a list of MUAs that actually support RFC 2369 with
subscription management widgets in the GUI? Surely someone has written
one but I can't seem to find any documentation to that effect.
Gnus?
Jens, Gnus user since 1999
--
William Herrin b...@herrin.us writes:
and you have to read the mail in Microsoft Lookout, interspersed with
work-oriented messages from your boss and colleagues. With Outlook
popping new-message-notifications up on the projector while you try to
give a presentation during a meeting, each
We use Solarwinds Orion for this stuff. We have some alerts for some switch
Ports configured.
You can get a trial version at www.solarwinds.com
2011/3/12 Wil Schultz wschu...@bsdboy.com
I use this Nagios plugin for up/down status alerts, it has some support for
interface bandwidth (and
On 3/12/2011 10:02 AM, John Levine wrote:
Anyone have a list of MUAs that actually support RFC 2369 with
subscription management widgets in the GUI? Surely someone has written
one but I can't seem to find any documentation to that effect.
Alpine, which has what must be the cruddiest GUI on the
Janos,
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Venkatesh Sriram wrote:
While I have used MD5 with OSPFv2, I never used authentication with
OSPFv3 since IPsec is (a) not available on all platforms (or/and
requires a special license) and (b) requires too much of coordination
with other folks to bring it up. I
On 2011-03-12, at 2:31 AM, Joe Renwick wrote:
These routers
are configured as BGP route-reflectors.
...
Niether
soft nor hard clears on the BGP neighbors worked, only the config removal.
Once re-applied life was good.
...
The bug itself was with the BGP updates sent by the RR. During
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Tom Limoncelli t...@whatexit.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
I think you'll be in for a surprise here, too. The 4G transition is already
underway. For the vendors where 4G means LTE, IPv6 is the native protocol
Now that is what Baldrick* would call a cunning plan!
And interesting examples.
Christian
*Apologies to Tony Robinson and Blackadder
On 12 Mar 2011, at 18:52, Tom Limoncelli wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Tom Limoncelli t...@whatexit.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Owen
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011 08:16:19 EST, William Herrin said:
Anyone have a list of MUAs that actually support RFC 2369 with
subscription management widgets in the GUI? Surely someone has written
one but I can't seem to find any documentation to that effect.
EXMH had that support long ago:
cvs
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:10 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
EXMH had that support long ago:
cvs repository 4/9/1999
Support for RFC2369. If a message contains RFC2369 compliant
headers, a List... menu will appear with List related items
on it. [ Note that this makes
On 12/03/11 5:16 AM, William Herrin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jeff Kelljeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
On 3/11/2011 8:24 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
From: William Herrinb...@herrin.us
No, it isn't. Contrary to mailing list best practices, NANOG
unsubscribe
On 3/12/11 5:00 AM, William Herrin wrote:
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
I'm super-tired of the but tcams are an expensive
non-commodity part not subject to economies of scale. this
has been repeated ad nauseam since the raws workshop if not before.
You
In message aanlktinvbcodxicqhmclop7qg3mh4388mrp1uevvk...@mail.gmail.com, Will
iam Herrin writes:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
On 3/11/2011 8:24 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
No, it isn't.
--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
On 3/11/2011 8:24 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
No, it isn't. Contrary to mailing list best practices, NANOG
unsubscribe information is
--- b...@herrin.us wrote:
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
colleagues. With Outlook popping new-message-notifications up on the
projector while you try to give a presentation during a meeting, each
containing the sender and message subject...
--
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On 3/12/11 5:00 AM, William Herrin wrote:
I'll be
convinced it can be done for less than 2x cost when someone actually
does it for less than 2x cost.
part of the exercise is neither building nor buying the capacity before
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 7:27 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
That must be my mistake then, because I thought the exercise was
building it in a way that it stays built for the maximum practical
number of years. When it has to be touched again (or tweaked if it
So when you upgrade a
Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:13:13PM -0800, Owen DeLong
wrote:
On Mar 11, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Well, I at least think an option should be a /80, using the 48 bits
of MAC directly. This generates exactly the same collision potential
28 matches
Mail list logo
