On Mar 30, 2011, at 10:26 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
It also needs
1. Someone to complain to law enforcement
True,
2. Law enforcement to decide this is something worth following up on
re prosecution - especially if the crook is not within their
jurisdiction, it'd be FBI, and
Local law isnt likely to touch this at all.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
If the crook is in another county, same state, it could be simple extradition.
If the crook is across state lines, it could still be handled as an
extradition,
but, slightly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Howdy.
We're conducting a statistical overview of peering sessions for a research
paper. The paper we produce will be input into OECD guidelines on national
communications regulatory frameworks, so we'd very much like it to accurately
reflect
In message Pine.OSX.4.64.1103310053260.312@cevin-2.local,
Brandon Ross br...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Ross Harvey wrote:
Wait a second, I'm pretty sure that in most contexts, a signature or
letterhead means not so much this is real because it's so obviously
genuine, but rather:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 10:26 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
It also needs
1. Someone to complain to law enforcement
True,
as has been brought up in the past here... some folk rely heavily upon
IRR data for route prefix
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 10:26 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
It also needs
1. Someone to complain to law enforcement
True,
as has been
In message b2506b41-ad1f-4fb0-9d8e-c0a54e44b...@delong.com,
Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
Cleaning up the routing {is not what ARIN does or thinks it should do}, true.
However, this sounds like there are two issues...
1. Routing -- Would be nice if the advertising provider(s) stopped
I don't believe this record indicates that Level3 proxy registered the route
object.
It means that someone used the DBANK-MNT maintainer ID in the Level3 RR to
enter a route object 18 months ago.
It looks like Level3 is originating the route in AS3356, not accepting it
from AS13767 (which is what
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Tony Tauber ttau...@1-4-5.net wrote:
I don't believe this record indicates that Level3 proxy registered the route
object.
It means that someone used the DBANK-MNT maintainer ID in the Level3 RR to
enter a route object 18 months ago.
possibly...
It looks
On 03/30/2011 03:53 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
I just stumbled onto this one the other day.
Apparently, Spamhaus has known about this one for THREE MONTHS already:
http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL98308
It's being routed by AS11730, aka Circle Internet LTD, a known
For the record, Integra Telecom did have LOA for said netblock.
Needless to say LOA was forged on company letterhead with appropriate
signatures. Once brought to our attention we attempted to contact
customer to no avail, netblock has been removed until they prove
otherwise.
Randy Rooney
On Thu,
On 03/31/2011 12:12 PM, rr wrote:
For the record, Integra Telecom did have LOA for said netblock.
Needless to say LOA was forged on company letterhead with appropriate
signatures. Once brought to our attention we attempted to contact
customer to no avail, netblock has been removed until they
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:11 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
r...@tristatelogic.com wrote:
...
Seriously, I was left with the impression that if IPv6 were a person, it
would be you, and that if it were a company, you would be the majority
shareholder. (Not that there would be anything wrong with
Hello
I am looking for people who has space and / or network in Terremark culpeper ,
please contact me off-list ( or people who is planning to get there sometime
soon..)
mehmet
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Petach [mailto:mpet...@netflight.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:28 PM
I for one would put money on the table towards the rename Owen to Mr.
IPv6
effort. I think it would be wonderful to be able to honestly say
IPv6 is in da
house! every
In message AANLkTikMqBx=cu5autr7addyn7u7wbeoww2qa9wdz...@mail.gmail.com,
rr rook...@gmail.com wrote:
For the record, Integra Telecom did have LOA for said netblock.
Needless to say LOA was forged on company letterhead with appropriate
signatures. Once brought to our attention we attempted to
Hmm, thought it was a NANOG prerequisite to be able to do a google
search. Should be pretty easy to find this info with that tool in your
handbag.
With the above tool I've got your phone # and would be happy to call
you if you'd like clarification on our process.
Please just reply to me
On Mar 31, 2011, at 12:01 PM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Petach [mailto:mpet...@netflight.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 2:28 PM
I for one would put money on the table towards the rename Owen to Mr.
IPv6
effort. I think it would be wonderful to
I for one would put money on the table towards the rename Owen to Mr.
IPv6
effort. I think it would be wonderful to be able to honestly say
IPv6 is in da
house! every time the person formerly known as Owen walked into the
room at ARIN meetings. :D
Like a v6, like a v6 could be the
On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Wil Schultz wrote:
On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Alexander Harrowell a.harrow...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tuesday 29 Mar 2011 17:54:27 Wil Schultz wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
And here's a breakdown of which user agents are seen
In message aanlktinvlqefvykc91d8p-n9zvdgr5prxreyptuim...@mail.gmail.com,
rr rook...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, thought it was a NANOG prerequisite to be able to do a google
search. Should be pretty easy to find this info with that tool in your
handbag.
Which info is that, exactly? Your title at
On Mar 31, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
(Sorry, but I can't help snickering a bit at your _prior_ employment.
As I feel sure you are already painfully aware, having that on your
resume does not exactly inspire a whole lotta confidence in the notion
that you are a straight
FYI
--Jonny Ogawa
- Forwarded message from Stephen H. Inden -
From: Stephen H. Inden
Subject: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:19:08 +0200
To: Global Environment Watch (GEW) mailing list
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
List-Id:
On Mar 31, 2011, at 6:14 PM, Joao C. Mendes Ogawa jonny.og...@gmail.com
wrote:
FYI
--Jonny Ogawa
- Forwarded message from Stephen H. Inden -
From: Stephen H. Inden
Subject: IPv4 Address Exhaustion Effects on the Earth
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:19:08 +0200
To: Global
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Stefan Fouant
sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net wrote:
+1 | That, or The evangelist formerly known as Owen... :p
No no ... TEFKAO.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com)
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Brett Watson br...@the-watsons.org wrote:
On Mar 31, 2011, at 5:46 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
(Sorry, but I can't help snickering a bit at your _prior_ employment.
As I feel sure you are already painfully aware, having that on your
resume does not exactly
This OT, and for those of you with virgin ears, don't read more. This is
specifically to Ronald:
Maybe, if you didn't act like a flaming douchebag, and were polite to
people, they would be more interested in helping you out. Learn to use some
fucking manners. Every single message I've seen from
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Matt Larson mlar...@verisign.com wrote:
As part of the deployment of DNSSEC in .com, the zone has been signed
and in a deliberately unvalidatable state for several weeks. Late
last week the .com key material was unobscured and the actual keys
have been visible
28 matches
Mail list logo
