+1 here on going all APC on the panels, note we run a gpon network so
making that choice was fairly easy for us. You do end up having to use a
lot of sc or lc/upc - sc/apc patch cables on the colo equipment side of
things but everything out in the field is 100% sc/apc.
Carlos Alcantar
Race
Hi,
It seems that today is a big day for IPv6. It is the very first
time when native IPv6 on google statistics
(http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-)
T.
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:40:45 -0800
Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
Setting up a proper IPv6 subnet and unique gateway for each VM is
probably insane, but, potentially less insane than some other
alternatives.
I second that! I give out a proper configured /64 to every customer
regardless of
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
It seems that today is a big day for IPv6. It is the very first
time when native IPv6 on google statistics
(http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
might say it is tremendous success after 16
It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a number
of reasons.
Owen
On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
It seems that today is a big day for IPv6. It is the
Or artificially high ...
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a
number
of reasons.
Owen
On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce aaron.topo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at
APNIC labs have an interesting set of numbers on IPv6 uptake as well.
http://labs.apnic.net/measureipv6/
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Owen DeLong wrote:
It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a number
of reasons.
Owen
On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce
Tomas Podermanski wrote:
Hi,
It seems that today is a big day for IPv6. It is the very first time
when
native IPv6 on google statistics
(http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-)
T.
So, I assume 6in4 tunnels like HE.net are included in the native percentage?
Oliver
-
Oliver Garraux
Check out my blog: www.GetSimpliciti.com/blog
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/olivergarraux
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:02 AM, William F. Maton Sotomayor
Hi,
So, I assume 6in4 tunnels like HE.net are included in the native percentage?
As the traffic is delivered as native traffic to Google I don't think Google
can even see that there is a tunnel between them and the user. They might see a
lower MTU, but to Google the traffic is native IPv6.
-
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: LIFE! DO YOU HEAR ME? GIVE MY CREATION... LIFE!
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
It seems that today is a big day for IPv6. It is the very first
time when native IPv6 on google statistics
* Oliver Garraux
So, I assume 6in4 tunnels like HE.net are included in the native
percentage?
Probably. Fortunately, they are a drop in the ocean (at least from my
point of view).
--
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com
On Nov 20, 2012, at 7:06 AM, Sander Steffann san...@steffann.nl wrote:
Hi,
So, I assume 6in4 tunnels like HE.net are included in the native
percentage?
As the traffic is delivered as native traffic to Google I don't think Google
can even see that there is a tunnel between them and the
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com wrote:
I saw this on Reddit and thought it was fascinating. I figured I'd share it
here too since no one else did.
http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/17/3655442/restoring-verizon-service-manhattan-hurricane-sandy
hey lookie! 'free
Hello,
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:14:18 +0100
Tomas Podermanski tpo...@cis.vutbr.cz wrote:
It seems that today is a big day for IPv6. It is the very first
time when native IPv6 on google statistics
(http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
might say it is
We had multiple servers synchronized with Windows/MS time change their clock to
the year 2000 today. It broke many things, including AD authentication.
These servers had been properly synchronized for years.
They were synchronized with Microsoft and NIST NTP servers.
This may not be
http://lookingglass.level3.net/
Should get U what U need.
Robert D. Scottrob...@ufl.edu
Senior Network Engineer352-273-0113 Phone
UF Information Technology 352-392-2061 CNS Phone Tree
CNS - Network Services 352-273-0743 FAX
University of Florida 352-294-3571 FLR NOC
On Nov 20, 2012, at 08:45 , Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a
number
of reasons.
AMS-IX publishes stats too:
https://stats.ams-ix.net/sflow/
This is probably a better view of overall percentage on the Internet
G'day!
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Attila Vekas attilave...@gmail.com wrote:
Regards,
Attila Vekas
Telstra
I'd say its AS23148 / Terremark with a bogon filter.
your fixed line traceroute shows the next-hop being the connection
between level3 and AS23148.
10 208 ms 191 ms 208
In a message written on Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:21:55PM -0700, Van Wolfe wrote:
Did anyone else experience issues with NTP today? We had our server
times update to the year 2000 at around 3:30 MT, then revert back to 2012.
I'm surprised the various time geeks aren't all posting their logs, so
On 20 November 2012 16:05, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Nov 20, 2012, at 08:45 , Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a
number
of reasons.
AMS-IX publishes stats too:
On Nov 20, 2012, at 11:42 , Mike Jones m...@mikejones.in wrote:
On 20 November 2012 16:05, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Nov 20, 2012, at 08:45 , Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a
number
of reasons.
On 20 Nov 2012, at 15:38, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
I'm still waiting for someone who was affected by this to provide
coherent logs from ntpd showing exactly when the time change happened.
Getting these, at least on an *IX system, is far from difficult folks.
from firewall ntp
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
If your machines switched dates yesterday it probably means you're
NTP infrastructure is insufficiently peered and diversified.
If you take anything away from this thread, this is it
-Steve
From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/17/3655442/restoring-verizon-service-m
anhattan-hurricane-sandy
hey lookie! 'free uprades'!
[WEG] Better that than we're going to replace all of this old technology with
exactly the same stuff
no idea, re sigterm cause
checked firewall system logs and could not see cause from that either
times are GMT
Colin
On 20 Nov 2012, at 17:05, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
Colin,
Signal 15 = SIGTERM, so something intentionally shut ntpd down on your
side. The logs I'd be
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:55 AM, George, Wes wesley.geo...@twcable.com wrote:
From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/17/3655442/restoring-verizon-service-m
anhattan-hurricane-sandy
hey lookie! 'free uprades'!
[WEG] Better that than
On 11/20/12 9:10 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:55 AM, George, Wes wesley.geo...@twcable.com wrote:
From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/17/3655442/restoring-verizon-service-m
anhattan-hurricane-sandy
hey lookie!
On 11/20/2012 12:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
it's acutally kinda nice that at least from CO - building now
there maybe more highspeed links... and maybe lower long term costs?
Be careful of what you wish for, Yes, you get fiber from the CO to
the Building... however there is also a
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:14:18 +0100
Tomas Podermanski tpo...@cis.vutbr.cz wrote:
It seems that today is a big day for IPv6. It is the very first
time when native IPv6 on google statistics
(http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
might say it is
On 11/19/12 6:08 PM, Wallace Keith wrote:
Just got paged with a pbx alarm that had 1970 as the year. By the time I
logged in , it was showing 2012. Using GPS for time and date.
I use GPS for my NTP server and didn't notice anything, but it's PPS
disciplined after initial sync so it
On 11/19/12 9:16 AM, Jamie Bowden wrote:
Actually, this is kind of an interesting aside. Last time I checked, Canada
counts as North America and large parts of Quebec are inhabited by folks who
don't speak much, if any, English. Having said that, I can't recall having
seen any Quebecois
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
On 11/20/2012 12:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
it's acutally kinda nice that at least from CO - building now
there maybe more highspeed links... and maybe lower long term costs?
Be careful of what you wish
Does anybody know of a list of BGP communities for AS2379 (EMBARK-WNPK now
CenturyLink)?
I haven't reached out to Centurylink yet, but I'm used to just finding them
through Google Searches.
Eric Miller, CCNP
Network Engineering Consultant
(407) 257-5115
I've found myself becoming a snob about IPv6. I almost look down on
IPv4-only networks in the same way that I won't go see a film that isn't
projected on DLP unless my arm is twisted. I'm a convert, and I'm glad to
see the adoption rate edging up.
However, I still scratch my head on why most
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Eric C. Miller e...@ericheather.com wrote:
Does anybody know of a list of BGP communities for AS2379 (EMBARK-WNPK now
CenturyLink)?
I haven't reached out to Centurylink yet, but I'm used to just finding them
through Google Searches.
On 11/20/12 10:20 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
On 11/20/2012 12:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
it's acutally kinda nice that at least from CO - building now
there maybe more highspeed links... and maybe lower long
On 20 Nov 2012, at 16:42, Mike Jones m...@mikejones.in wrote:
If these figures are representative (google saying 1% of users and
AMSIX saying 0.5% of traffic) then it would indicate that dual stacked
users can push ~50% of their traffic over IPv6. If this is even close
to reality then that
On 11/20/2012 1:20 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
On 11/20/2012 12:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
it's acutally kinda nice that at least from CO - building now
there maybe more highspeed links... and maybe lower long
After some private replies, I'm going to reply to my own post with
some information here.
It appears many people don't understand how the NTP protocol works.
I suspect many people have configured a primary and a backup
NTP server on many of their devices. It turns out this is the
_WORST_
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Derek Ivey de...@derekivey.com
wrote:
I saw this on Reddit and thought it was fascinating. I figured I'd
share it here too since no one else did.
A subscriber to Outages who wishes to remain nameless passes along the
pointer to this story: Apparently, either tick or tock got rebooted
yesterday, and came up with its local clock set to 2000. And lots of
people believed it.
https://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?nstoryid=14548
Did you believe
- Original Message -
From: Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org
To protect against two falseticking servers (tick and tock, as we saw on
the 19th) you need _FIVE_ servers minimum configured if they are both in
the list. More importantly, if you want to protect against a source
(GPS, CDMA,
On Nov 20, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org
To protect against two falseticking servers (tick and tock, as we saw on
the 19th) you need _FIVE_ servers minimum configured if they are both in
the list.
Mike Jones wrote:
On 20 November 2012 16:05, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Nov 20, 2012, at 08:45 , Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low
for a number of reasons.
AMS-IX publishes stats too:
While looking into the NTP chaos from Monday, I noticed that my personal
servers have an NTP peer running IPv6.
I have no idea how long that's been going on - it was a complete non-event
;).
--
Harald
Hi,
On 11/20/12 7:24 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
I've found myself becoming a snob about IPv6. I almost look down on
IPv4-only networks in the same way that I won't go see a film that isn't
projected on DLP unless my arm is twisted. I'm a convert, and I'm glad to
see the adoption rate edging
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
On 11/20/2012 1:20 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
wrote:
On 11/20/2012 12:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
it's acutally kinda nice that at least
On 11/20/2012 2:58 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net wrote:
On 11/20/2012 1:20 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Faisal Imtiaz fai...@snappydsl.net
wrote:
On 11/20/2012 12:10 PM, Christopher Morrow
In a message written on Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:28:19PM -0500, Jay Ashworth
wrote:
I'm curious, Leo, what your internal setup looks like. Do you have an
internal pair of masters, all slaved to those externals and one another,
with your machines homed to them? Full mesh? Or something else?
Christopher Morrow wrote:
apologies, I forgot the emoticons after my last comment. i really did
mean it in jest... I don't think VZ has harnessed
weather-changing-powers. (yet).
Well, they ARE The Phone Company!
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice,
On Nov 20, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
.
I've also been looking at an item like this:
http://www.netburnerstore.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=PK70EX-NTP
which is about $300 + misc parts.
Should be well worth it to avoid a 'major outage' that
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
For small players, less than 4 sites, typically just use the NTP
pool servers, configuring 4 per box minimum. If you want the same
protection I just outlined in the paragraph before, make 4 of your
servers talk to the
I usually use time.nist.gov.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Darius Jahandarie djahanda...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
For small players, less than 4 sites, typically just use the NTP
pool servers, configuring 4 per box minimum. If
Logs from a Juniper router in a customer network - we had hundreds of these
affected. They all synchronize to internal hosts (172.20.167.251 and .252)
which are configured to get time from NIST and USNO
CORP-NTP-01#sh ntp as
address ref clock st when poll reach delay
On Nov 20, 2012, at 4:00 PM, Darius Jahandarie djahanda...@gmail.com wrote:
Choosing the first four servers is usually pretty straightforward:
*.CC.pool.ntp.org
But beyond that, I'm honestly rather curious what server selections
are a good idea. A first thought would be an adjacent
- Original Message -
From: Darius Jahandarie djahanda...@gmail.com
Choosing the first four servers is usually pretty straightforward:
*.CC.pool.ntp.org
But beyond that, I'm honestly rather curious what server selections
are a good idea. A first thought would be an adjacent country,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
For myself, I usually pick the first three in us.pool.ntp.org, tick and tock,
time.nist.gov, and a couple of regionally appropriate large universities.
As this week indicated, perhaps tick and tock are not sufficiently
El jueves, 15 de noviembre de 2012 01:05:37 p.m., Jima escribió:
On Wednesday, November 14th, 2012, Olivier CALVANO wrote:
I am search one or more carrier for connect 3 sites in Brasil, Mexico
and Argentina to one of our pop
in USA or Spain.
I don't deal with it directly, but my employer
In message 50abc681.5040...@rollernet.us, Seth Mattinen writes:
On 11/19/12 9:16 AM, Jamie Bowden wrote:
Actually, this is kind of an interesting aside. Last time I checked, Canad
a counts as North America and large parts of Quebec are inhabited by folks wh
o don't speak much, if any,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 04:53:39PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
For myself, I usually pick the first three in us.pool.ntp.org, tick and tock,
time.nist.gov, and a couple of regionally appropriate large universities.
I'd advise going through the RR for a while, and pick servers
close to
On 11/20/12 3:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message 50abc681.5040...@rollernet.us, Seth Mattinen writes:
On 11/19/12 9:16 AM, Jamie Bowden wrote:
Actually, this is kind of an interesting aside. Last time I checked, Canad
a counts as North America and large parts of Quebec are inhabited by
On 11/19/12, Van Wolfe vanwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Did anyone else experience issues with NTP today? We had our server
times update to the year 2000 at around 3:30 MT, then revert back to 2012.
Are you sure that you are actually using NTP to set your clock?
For you to sync with 2000, you should
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you sure that you are actually using NTP to set your clock?
For you to sync with 2000, you should have had multiple confused
peers from multiple time sources; possibly a false radio signal
NTP by default has a
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/19/12, Van Wolfe vanwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Did anyone else experience issues with NTP today? We had our server
times update to the year 2000 at around 3:30 MT, then revert back to
2012.
Are you sure that you are
Looks like something bad has happened:
Behind the Random NTP Bizarreness of Incorrect Year Being Set
https://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?nstoryid=14548
---
A few people have written in within the past 18 hours about their NTP
server/clients getting set to the year 2000. The cause of this behavior is
That's what happens when you just follow vendor recommendations blindly. If
you do follow that on vm's (which can actually be a good practice), make
sure they pull from your own time infrastructure, and not just the world at
large, and that those servers behave in a sane fashion with regard to
As a reminder - time infrastructure is not recommended for
virtualization. Make them physicals.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote:
That's what happens when you just follow vendor recommendations blindly. If
you do follow that on vm's (which can actually be a
On Nov 20, 2012, at 14:44 , Tony Hain alh-i...@tndh.net wrote:
If you assume that Youtube/Facebook/Netflix are 50% of the overall traffic,
why wouldn't a dual stacked end point have half of its traffic as IPv6 after
June???
If you assume Kinda says it all right there.
But more
Good stuff here:
http://www.n2prise.org/fiber002.htm and http://www.n2prise.org/fiber003.htm
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Kell [mailto:jeff-k...@utc.edu]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 3:37 PM
To: nanog
Subject: Fiber terminations -- UPC vs APC
Looking for some
70 matches
Mail list logo
