I'm in the midst of what would be a comedy of errors if it weren't so
annoying. I bought a new Grandstream HT701 VoIP terminal adapter from
a guy on eBay who is apparently an official Grandstream reseller. It
doesn't work. The guy I bought it from (whose support ends at "nobody
else has that pro
http://datainterfaces.com/CWDM-DWDM-Solutions.aspx
Try these folks.
Faisal
On Feb 7, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Years ago I was able to purchase 2-Channel CWDM Plug-In 1-Wavelength
> Optical Add/Drop Multiplexors from Finisar with SC/APC connectors on
> them, even though they no
Years ago I was able to purchase 2-Channel CWDM Plug-In 1-Wavelength
Optical Add/Drop Multiplexors from Finisar with SC/APC connectors on
them, even though they normally only make the SC/PC version shown
here:
FWSF-OADM-1-xx-SC
http://www.finisar.com/products/passives/MUX-DEMUX/CWDM_OADM-1_Plug-i
No one had hit the ISIS bug before the IETF enforced maintenance freeze because
no one in their right mind would be running three week old code back then. I
don't think things have changed that much. ;)
-dorian
On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:19 PM, Siegel, David wrote:
> I remember being glued to my wor
Hi Peter,
http://www.aristanetworks.com/media/system/pdf/Datasheets/7050S_Datasheet.pdf
Arista 7050S-64 48 x 10GE + 4 x 40 GE, price around 25k$ in gpl.
Large buffers, supports MLAG, DCB, wire-speed L2/L3 (OSPF,BGP), but doesn't
have any kind of TRILL implementation.
Have it in production, but for
I remember being glued to my workstation for 10 straight hours due to an OSPF
bug that took down the whole of net99's network.
I was pretty proud of our size at the time...about 30Mbps at peak. Times are
different and so are expectations. :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Brett Wats
- Original Message -
> From: "Darin Perusich"
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> > As a field report, BTW: SuSE 12.1 has no packages at all, even in Packman,
> > and CentOS5 has only rt3 (of unknown release), even with epel and remi.
>
> I'm the request-tracker pack
[ Oops. Disregard. Damn, but I wish Zimbra understood List-Reply. I
only hung the bug ticket 4 years (and two major releases) ago... --j ]
- Original Message -
> From: "Jay Ashworth"
> To: "NANOG"
> Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 3:41:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] Ticket Image at
ght now.
(tlmc-20130207-r1.tar.gz)
The file 'TLMC.OVERVIEW' should, hopefully, get you an better idea of
how TLMC works.
The complete DNS server for both the CSP and the ISP is included as well
as the plug-in for the Traffic Server (which is required to let
end user/customer to c
- Original Message -
> From: "Joshua Lansford"
> On 02/07/2013 02:43 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> > Question: do you guys make a point, at all, of evangelizing to
> > distro
> > maintainers and packagers that they package 4.x, or, more to the
> > point
> > pull 3.x*out* of repos?
>
> I chec
The Juniper PR in question is actually 836197.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Jonathan Towne wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 07:57:06AM -0500, Alex Rubenstein scribbled:
> > # The question should be more along the lines of, "why aren'
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Jason Baugher wrote:
On the CO-side electronics, however... I think it's safe to say that you
can do GPON under $100/port. AE is probably going to run close to
$300/port. That's a pretty big cost difference, and if it were me I'd be
looking pretty hard at a PON deployment f
On Feb 7, 2013 12:24 PM, "Mikael Abrahamsson" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Scott Helms wrote:
>
>> That has not been demonstrated in the market. There are lots of people
who say this, generally they're involved in building fiber plants, but in
the US and Canada I've not seen a single report of
In a greenfield build, cost difference for plant between PON and active
will be negligible for field-based splitters, non-existent for CO-based
splitters.
If the company already has some fiber in the ground, then depending on
where it is might drastically reduce build costs to use field-based
spli
- Original Message -
> From: "Masataka Ohta"
> Scott Helms wrote:
> > Now, in general for greenfield builds I'd agree except for
> > PON, which is in many cases cheaper than an Ethernet build.
>
> As PON require considerably longer drop cable from a splitters
> to 4 or 8 subscribers, it
Scott Helms wrote:
> Now, in general for greenfield builds I'd agree except for
> PON, which is in many cases cheaper than an Ethernet build.
As PON require considerably longer drop cable from a splitters
to 4 or 8 subscribers, it can not be cheaper than Ethernet,
unless subscriber density is ver
reachable from eastern canada
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
> ...seems to be having trouble as reported by Systems Watch:
> https://twitter.com/systemswatch/status/299572918936039424
>
> Indeed, it's inaccessible to me from Minneapolis, Tampa, SJC, and
> Seattle...both 8.8.
...seems to be having trouble as reported by Systems Watch:
https://twitter.com/systemswatch/status/299572918936039424
Indeed, it's inaccessible to me from Minneapolis, Tampa, SJC, and
Seattle...both 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4.
I know it's anycast, so I'm not sure which DCs are affected...
Blair
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Scott Helms wrote:
That has not been demonstrated in the market. There are lots of people
who say this, generally they're involved in building fiber plants, but
in the US and Canada I've not seen a single report of an actual network
where this was true. Do you have any do
Well, talking about HP´s A5920/A5900 series. Last time I was looking,
their virtual routing instances haven´t supported IPv4 multicast, nor
IPv6 multicast/unicast, nor any policy based routing.
Michael
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "david raistrick"
sure would be nice if the nanog meetings were a bit better
announcedwhy do I aways find out about the orlando ones during or
after?
I hadn't realized there was another one in Orlando, David; l
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Scott Helms wrote:
>
> The cost difference in a single interface card to carry an OC-3/12 isn't
>> significantly more than a Gig-E card. Now, as I said there is no advantage
>> to doing ATM, but the real cost saving
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Vitkovsky"
> Can't find any statement whether the nifty proclaimed 400G wavelength
> is indeed a single 100GHz channel or just a bundled supper channel
> The only hint is the total capacity of a fiber of 17.6 Tbps with 44
> wavelengths which is roughly t
On 29/01/2013 11:58, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> None of them will do trill. The Extreme X670 and Juniper EX4550 will both
> do VPLS, though. The X670 won't do BGP.
this is incorrect: the ex4550 will do l2vpn/l3vpn but not vpls. The X480
does vpls, but not the X670.
Nick
Hi All.
Our Research Memo for Server ScaleOut Tips using Policy Based Routing
is now available.
PBR-LB - Direct Server Return Load Balancing
using Policy Based Routing (MEMO) http://slidesha.re/VJvdbQ
plz enjoy it if you are interested in this article. ;-)
Best regard,
--
SAKUR
On 03/02/13 05:55, Frank Bulk wrote:
Yes, but IP TV is not profitable on stand-alone basis -- it's just a
necessary part of the triple play. A lot of the discussion has been about
Internet and network design, but not much about the other two "plays".
I've certainly heard FTTH deployers mention
Good times indeed...
Regards,
Jeff
On Feb 7, 2013, at 2:09, "Brett Watson" wrote:
> Hell, we used to not have to bother notifying customers of anything, we just
> fixed the problem. Reminds me a of a story I've probably shared on the past.
>
> 1995, IETF in Dallas. The "big ISP" I worked for
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Scott Helms wrote:
The cost difference in a single interface card to carry an OC-3/12 isn't
significantly more than a Gig-E card. Now, as I said there is no
advantage to doing ATM, but the real cost savings in a single interface
are not significant.
There has always been
Can't find any statement whether the nifty proclaimed 400G wavelength is indeed
a single 100GHz channel or just a bundled supper channel
The only hint is the total capacity of a fiber of 17.6 Tbps with 44 wavelengths
which is roughly the whole 100GHz spaced grid
adam
-Original Message-
29 matches
Mail list logo
