I have been having issues with their iPad App all day
-Original Message-
From: Jayram Déshpandé [mailto:jayde...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 4:38 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Wells Fargo getting DDoSed ?
I observed that since morning Wells Fargo web services are either n
Closest I've seen is 60km. I would be interested to hear if someone knows
of an 80km option.
http://www.fiberstore.com/new-xfp-bidi-10gbps-single-mode-60km-1330nmtx-127
0nmrx-transceiver-module-p-13175.html
--
Brandon Robare
Network Engineer, NoaNet
c: 503.798.1515
noc: 866.662.6380 | n...@noan
In a message written on Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 10:01:34AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> it's putting such things in one's igp that disgusts me. as joe said,
> igp is just for the loopbacks and other interfaces it takes to make your
> ibgp work.
While your method is correct for probably 80-90% of the I
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Even if the exchange does not advertise the exchange LAN, it's
probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at least IBGP) of
everyone connected to it,
>>
>> yikes! this is quite ill-advised and i don't know anyone who does
>> this
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> Even if the exchange does not advertise the exchange LAN, it's
>>> probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at least IBGP) of
>>> everyone connected to it,
>
> yikes! this is quite ill-advised and i don't know anyone who does
> this, but i
Yeah, you wouldn't think that one should fall out.
It is possible that my 195.66.241.146 really should
be something sitting within: 195.66.232.0/22.
I'll have to talk with some of the LINX folks to
understand whether they are intending that 195.66.240.0/22
and 195.66.232.0/22 are treated differen
Can a Microsoft email admin contact me off list in regards to issues
emailing a few of our domains?
Thanks,
Cody
I observed that since morning Wells Fargo web services are either not
reachable or are really slow.
I think they are getting DDoSed again. Any official information yet ?
Regards,
-Jay.
--
"Subvert the paradigm." - C.K. Prahlad
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> Check out: http://www.bcp38.info
Right on. :-)
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
>> Even if the exchange does not advertise the exchange LAN, it's
>> probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at least IBGP) of
>> everyone connected to it,
yikes! this is quite ill-advised and i don't know anyone who does
this, but i think all my competitors should.
> I have experience of se
First of all I agree with Leo that not advertising IX prefixes permanently
causes more problems than it solves.
> Even if the exchange does not advertise the exchange LAN, it's probably
the case that it is in the IGP (or at least IBGP) of everyone connected to
it
Well if I would peer with such
On 2013-04-04, at 15:53, Brian Dickson wrote:
> Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> Even if the exchange does not advertise the
> exchange LAN, it's probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at
> least IBGP) of everyone connected to it,
I have experience of several networks where that is not the case. I
Leo Bicknell wrote:
Even if the exchange does not advertise the
exchange LAN, it's probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at
least IBGP) of everyone connected to it, and by extension all of
their customers with a default route pointed at them.
Actually, that may not be the case, and proba
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>
> But hey, this is a good thing because a DDOS caused issues, right?
> Well, not so much. Even if the exchange does not advertise the
> exchange LAN, it's probably the case that it is in the IGP (or at
> least IBGP) of everyone connected to i
In a message written on Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:57:11PM -0400, Jay Ashworth
wrote:
> Yes. In the fallout from the Cloudflare attack of last week it was
> announced that several IXs were going to stop advertising the
> address space of their peering lan, which properly does not need to
> be adver
Yes. In the fallout from the Cloudflare attack of last week it was
announced that several IXs were going to stop advertising the
address space of their peering lan, which properly does not need to
be advertised anyway.
Yes, that will cause some minor problems for those who work for and
with the
[Plug alert]
For longer term monitoring, Project BISmark provides an easy-to-use
system. It's an open source, customizable OpenWRT-based home router that
runs periodic network measurements (latency, throughput, packetloss,
jitter, etc) to nearby MLab servers.
It uses netperf (single and multiple
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 17:29:40 +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson said:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> > RFC4989 TCP Extended Statistics MIB. M. Mathis, J. Heffner, R.
> > Raghunarayan. May 2007. (Format: TXT=153768 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED
> > STANDARD)
> >
> > Looks like a
The MT speed test is a multi-connection test, think 20 streams or connections
at once.Most web based tests are single stream. Now you get into 802.11N
speedtests where they are optimized for many connections MIMO operations,
hence, a single connection don't show good results, where a MT tes
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
RFC4989 TCP Extended Statistics MIB. M. Mathis, J. Heffner, R.
Raghunarayan. May 2007. (Format: TXT=153768 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED
STANDARD)
Looks like a taker to me. Also, see the work the Web10G group is doing for
Linux: http://www.
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 06:18:34 +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson said:
> I have pitched the idea in the IETF to have TCP stacks themselves report
> IP performance indicators (aggregate) and that a standard for this to be
> standardised. No takers so far.
RFC4989 TCP Extended Statistics MIB. M. Mathis, J. H
It'd be nice to know if NDT was not accurate as well. Anyone tested it?
We've been using it for a few years. On my laptop that runs linux I get
fairly consistent results (around 935Mb/s up and down right now) over a
1Gig routed link (a couple routers and a firewall in between.) On the Windows
oops! i have a host directly on the linx on which i can give you
shell access
> He probably was thinking of a Volvo 245...
Duett PV445
> >> The topic at hand and the specific questions that have been
> >> asked as part of the consultation are important ones;
> >
> > Do it when you feel like, nobody should notice. Anything
> > this important should be routine procedure, make it daily.
>
> You do realize this requires changing val
On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
>> The topic at hand and the specific questions that have been
>> asked as part of the consultation are important ones;
>
> Do it when you feel like, nobody should notice. Anything
> this important should be routine procedure, make it daily.
When is speed ever ensured past someone else's edge/border ?
You may pass through your upstream that fast but once you are out in the open
range you are free game to all the lions, tigers & bears..,
There is always going to be something eating you. Best off letting it be the
Spanish queasiness
On 04/03/2013 02:48 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:07:48 -0700, Mike said:
These speedtests are pure unscientific bs and I'd love to see them
called out on the carpet for it.
As far as I know, it's possible for the end-to-end reported values to be
lower than your im
Subject: Re: RFC 1149 Date: Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:59:47PM -0400 Quoting Jay
Ashworth (j...@baylink.com):
> George Herbert wrote:
>
> >In europe? He probably was thinking of a Volvo 245...
>
> I don't /think/ Andy was over there that far back.
"that far back"? The 245 still rolls, and probab
29 matches
Mail list logo
