Re: CenturyLink IP NOC Contact for BGP Changes

On 11/25/13, 8:26 PM, Jawaid Desktop wrote: > Hello NANOGers, > > We're a regional CLEC and I've had a BGP filter change request in to > CenturyLink for 3 days. I've had no luck trying to get this processed. > > I tried calling in tonight because, you know, my expectation these days > is that eve

Re: CenturyLink IP NOC Contact for BGP Changes

Once upon a time, Jawaid Desktop said: > We're a regional CLEC and I've had a BGP filter change request in to > CenturyLink for 3 days. I've had no luck trying to get this > processed. It might help if you specify which part of CenturyLink (for example, which AS). CL is made up of a bunch of dif

CenturyLink IP NOC Contact for BGP Changes

Hello NANOGers, We're a regional CLEC and I've had a BGP filter change request in to CenturyLink for 3 days. I've had no luck trying to get this processed. I tried calling in tonight because, you know, my expectation these days is that every serious internet backbone company staffs a 24/7/365

Re: telnet into a netgear switch?

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Pedro Cavaca wrote: > > > > On 25 November 2013 23:42, David Birdsong wrote: > >> On Nov 25, 2013 1:51 PM, "Jason Pope" wrote: >> > >> > -- >> > Message: 2 >> > Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:47:09 -0800 >> > From: David Birdsong >> > To:

Re: telnet into a netgear switch?

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:42 PM, David Birdsong wrote: > > On Nov 25, 2013 1:51 PM, "Jason Pope" wrote: > > > > -- > > Message: 2 > > Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:47:09 -0800 > > From: David Birdsong > > To: nanog@nanog.org > > Subject: telnet into a netgear switch? > >

Re: Meraki

On Nov 25, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Ray Soucy wrote: > It looks like Brocade has swapped out Quagga with IP Infusion's non-free > version, ZebOS. They also decided to abandon the FOSS Vyatta Core project. > > It's really unfortunate, as the FOSS project is the only reason I was > interested in paying

Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing

No logged error with mismatched neighbor IP address - neither router had an entry.  Session did not establish nor go active, I could wait forever and neither would happen.  Point is, an error message is not generated on the downstream router so it's probably not the cause for the error message.

Re: telnet into a netgear switch?

It could be any number of things, APC for example need a vendor option set in DHCP or a ³Magic² ping. It could be that the app just talks to it on L2 like Microtik¹s. I suspect the windows app will be your only option. -- Geraint Jones On 26/11/13 12:42 pm, "David Birdsong" wrote: >On Nov

Re: telnet into a netgear switch?

On 25 November 2013 23:42, David Birdsong wrote: > On Nov 25, 2013 1:51 PM, "Jason Pope" wrote: > > > > -- > > Message: 2 > > Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:47:09 -0800 > > From: David Birdsong > > To: nanog@nanog.org > > Subject: telnet into a netgear switch? > > Message

Re: Meraki

> > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:32:10 -0500 > From: Ray Soucy > To: Rob Seastrom > Cc: NANOG > Subject: Re: Meraki > Message-ID: > < > calftrnppbqlhrrdkmnt1nz8wi0k3b6kemt9tbgns-wfrhqs...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > It looks like Brocade has swapped ou

RE: telnet into a netgear switch?

On Nov 25, 2013 1:51 PM, "Jason Pope" wrote: > > -- > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:47:09 -0800 > From: David Birdsong > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: telnet into a netgear switch? > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > He

Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing

When you say "no logged error" with mismatched neighbor IP address, what do you mean? Did the session just not establish at all? How long did you wait for it to attempt to establish? On Juniper, if it sees a BGP connection come from an IP address that doesn't match a local "neighbor" statement,

Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing

The auth error was transient, forget about it. Now you're getting 6/1 - maximum number of prefixes reached. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4486 (or http://backupsalmanaja.blogspot.ie/2009/12/bgp-cease-notification-messages.htmlif you prefer). HTH On 25 November 2013 23:07, Eric A Louie wrote:

Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing

All Cisco/Cisco, I don't have a Juniper here to test with mismatch AS *Apr  9 00:31:47.691: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 10.250.254.253 2/2 (peer in wrong AS) 2 bytes 6A39 mismatch neighbor IP address no logged error MTU mismatch no logged error, session remained up Subnet mask

RE: telnet into a netgear switch?

-- Message: 2 Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:47:09 -0800 From: David Birdsong To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: telnet into a netgear switch? Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey all, last night while at the datacenter I was in a pinch to extend

Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing

Authentication failure might mean (without knowing for sure which on Cisco): - mismatch AS numbers - mismatch neighbor IP addresses - multihop/TTL issues - MTU issues On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:06:33AM -0800, Eric A Louie wrote: > That's a natural first impression but there are no passwords confi

Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing

That's a natural first impression but there are no passwords configured on the BGP session on either router.  I know it looks like an authentication error but it's a "misnomer" (at least from the searches I did on the error message).  From the sequence of messages, we get Established and 2 secon

RE: BGP neighbor/configuration testing

Here are a couple of examples of syslog messages that could be seen depending on the configuration of the MD5 passwords on each side: Troubleshooting Examples If BGP neighbor authentication is incorrectly configured (for example, it is either configured on only one peer or the MD5 shared secret

Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing

Seems like: > Nov 25 06:28:34.837 pacific: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor > xxx.118.92.149 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes > should be a good starting place. I'm assuming you've already discussed auth keys with your provider and if everyone is putting that in correctly, I'd sug

Re: BGP neighbor/configuration testing

The turn-up was unsuccessful.  The provider and I could not get an Established BGP session.  Here's the log results from my router: Nov 25 06:28:34.837 pacific: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor xxx.118.92.149 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes Nov 25 06:29:09.690 pacific: %BGP-5-ADJ

Re: telnet into a netgear switch?

On Nov 25, 2013 6:47 AM, "Christopher Morrow" wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:47 PM, David Birdsong wrote: > > JGS524E > > > kinda thinking that: > "NETGEAR 24 Port Gigabit Unmanged Plus Business-Class Rackmount Switch > - Lifetime Warranty (JGS524E)" > > coupled with: > "Network Management

Re: telnet into a netgear switch?

That netgear link you submitted is primarily for routers, not switches. Sent from my (old) iPhone5 On Nov 24, 2013, at 18:47, David Birdsong wrote: > Hey all, last night while at the datacenter I was in a pinch to extend a > rack's LAN. I compromised and ran out to the local Fry's to buy whatev

Re: telnet into a netgear switch?

On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 9:47 PM, David Birdsong wrote: > JGS524E kinda thinking that: "NETGEAR 24 Port Gigabit Unmanged Plus Business-Class Rackmount Switch - Lifetime Warranty (JGS524E)" coupled with: "Network Management Type Unmanaged" on:

Re: Meraki

It looks like Brocade has swapped out Quagga with IP Infusion's non-free version, ZebOS. They also decided to abandon the FOSS Vyatta Core project. It's really unfortunate, as the FOSS project is the only reason I was interested in paying the licensing. It was attractive to have Vyatta Core as a

telnet into a netgear switch?

Hey all, last night while at the datacenter I was in a pinch to extend a rack's LAN. I compromised and ran out to the local Fry's to buy whatever switch I could find so as to allow some configuration to happen while we wait for the real network gear to show up. I left before confirming I could acc

Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO

Andrew, Question is this native or 6rd? According to my ARIN WHOIS query it looks like 6rd. Definitely great news that you were able to acquire IPv6. John Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 01:22:02 -0500 From: Andrew D Kirch To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO Message-ID: <5290

Re: Policy-based routing is evil? Discuss.

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Michael Smith wrote: > > On Nov 24, 2013, at 10:36 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:27 PM, William Waites >wrote: > > I'm having a discussion with a small network in a part of the world > where bandwidth is scarce and multiple DSL lines